{"title":"腰椎间盘突出症患者的手术决策经验:一项定性研究。","authors":"Mingyang Qian, Wei Jiang, Qingsong Zou, Wenlin Cheng, Mengyi Xu, Li Hua, Jiangming Yu","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S539717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to explore the experiences and pivotal influencing factors of patients with Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) during the surgical decision-making phase to provide a basis for optimizing the shared decision-making between medical professionals and patients and for the implementation of personalized nursing care.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This phenomenological study employed face-to-face semi-structured interviews, conducted between January and February 2025. Purposive sampling method was used to select 20 patients with lumbar disc herniation from the orthopedic ward of a tertiary hospital. The interview data were analyzed by Colaizzi's seven-step phenomenological analysis method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings of this study revealed that the surgical decision-making experiences of patients with LDH can be delineated into four themes: (1) Motivations underlying the surgical Decision; (2) Decision-making dilemmas arising from insufficient patient information; (3) The multi-dimensional factors influencing decision-making, and (4) Patients express unmet peri-operative needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reveals that surgical decision-making in patients with lumbar disc herniation is a complex process involving the interaction of biological, psychological, and social factors. It is essential to establish a patient-centered decision-support system, integrating structured information tools, psychological interventions, and hierarchical educational strategies. Future research endeavors should concentrate on the potential value of digital health technologies in enhancing the decision-making experience and seek to augment the effectiveness of decision-making aids through cultural adaptation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"2609-2621"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380087/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical Decision-Making Experience of Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Mingyang Qian, Wei Jiang, Qingsong Zou, Wenlin Cheng, Mengyi Xu, Li Hua, Jiangming Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PPA.S539717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to explore the experiences and pivotal influencing factors of patients with Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) during the surgical decision-making phase to provide a basis for optimizing the shared decision-making between medical professionals and patients and for the implementation of personalized nursing care.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This phenomenological study employed face-to-face semi-structured interviews, conducted between January and February 2025. Purposive sampling method was used to select 20 patients with lumbar disc herniation from the orthopedic ward of a tertiary hospital. The interview data were analyzed by Colaizzi's seven-step phenomenological analysis method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings of this study revealed that the surgical decision-making experiences of patients with LDH can be delineated into four themes: (1) Motivations underlying the surgical Decision; (2) Decision-making dilemmas arising from insufficient patient information; (3) The multi-dimensional factors influencing decision-making, and (4) Patients express unmet peri-operative needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reveals that surgical decision-making in patients with lumbar disc herniation is a complex process involving the interaction of biological, psychological, and social factors. It is essential to establish a patient-centered decision-support system, integrating structured information tools, psychological interventions, and hierarchical educational strategies. Future research endeavors should concentrate on the potential value of digital health technologies in enhancing the decision-making experience and seek to augment the effectiveness of decision-making aids through cultural adaptation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"2609-2621\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380087/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S539717\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S539717","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Surgical Decision-Making Experience of Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Qualitative Study.
Purpose: This study aimed to explore the experiences and pivotal influencing factors of patients with Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) during the surgical decision-making phase to provide a basis for optimizing the shared decision-making between medical professionals and patients and for the implementation of personalized nursing care.
Patients and methods: This phenomenological study employed face-to-face semi-structured interviews, conducted between January and February 2025. Purposive sampling method was used to select 20 patients with lumbar disc herniation from the orthopedic ward of a tertiary hospital. The interview data were analyzed by Colaizzi's seven-step phenomenological analysis method.
Results: The findings of this study revealed that the surgical decision-making experiences of patients with LDH can be delineated into four themes: (1) Motivations underlying the surgical Decision; (2) Decision-making dilemmas arising from insufficient patient information; (3) The multi-dimensional factors influencing decision-making, and (4) Patients express unmet peri-operative needs.
Conclusion: This study reveals that surgical decision-making in patients with lumbar disc herniation is a complex process involving the interaction of biological, psychological, and social factors. It is essential to establish a patient-centered decision-support system, integrating structured information tools, psychological interventions, and hierarchical educational strategies. Future research endeavors should concentrate on the potential value of digital health technologies in enhancing the decision-making experience and seek to augment the effectiveness of decision-making aids through cultural adaptation.
期刊介绍:
Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal.
As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.