父母对儿科外科设施集中化的偏好:来自离散选择实验的见解。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Kengo Hattori, Kentaro Hayashi, Shinsuke Ikeda
{"title":"父母对儿科外科设施集中化的偏好:来自离散选择实验的见解。","authors":"Kengo Hattori, Kentaro Hayashi, Shinsuke Ikeda","doi":"10.1007/s00383-025-06165-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to quantify the trade-off between benefits of pediatric surgical facility centralization and reduced accessibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A discrete choice experiment was conducted among parents of neonatal patients at Takatsuki Hospital (January 2021 to March 2024). Hypothetical facilities with varying levels of seven attributes-surgeon numbers and emergency coverage (EC), annual surgical volume, travel time, availability of pediatric specialists, advanced surgical capability, postoperative complication rates, and primary physician system-were presented. Preferences for each attribute and marginal rates of substitution with respect to travel time were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 317 sets from 646 responses. Preferences were significantly influenced by surgeon numbers and EC, annual surgical volume, and travel time. Compared to \"one surgeon/no EC,\" \"three surgeons/daytime EC\" and \"seven surgeons/24 h EC\" were valued equivalent to 99 and 249 min travel time increases. \"Medium (≥ 1, < 6 cases/year)\" and \"high (≥ 6 cases/year)\" were preferred over \"low (< 1 case/year)\" surgical volumes, equivalent to 123 and 219 min increases. Availability of other specialists (64 min), advanced surgery (33 min), and lower complications (24 min) were also valued. Team-based care was less preferred (- 26 min).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parents support centralization of pediatric surgical facilities, placing greater emphasis on structural improvements than direct clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19832,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Surgery International","volume":"41 1","pages":"266"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parental preferences for pediatric surgical facility centralization: insights from a discrete choice experiment.\",\"authors\":\"Kengo Hattori, Kentaro Hayashi, Shinsuke Ikeda\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00383-025-06165-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to quantify the trade-off between benefits of pediatric surgical facility centralization and reduced accessibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A discrete choice experiment was conducted among parents of neonatal patients at Takatsuki Hospital (January 2021 to March 2024). Hypothetical facilities with varying levels of seven attributes-surgeon numbers and emergency coverage (EC), annual surgical volume, travel time, availability of pediatric specialists, advanced surgical capability, postoperative complication rates, and primary physician system-were presented. Preferences for each attribute and marginal rates of substitution with respect to travel time were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 317 sets from 646 responses. Preferences were significantly influenced by surgeon numbers and EC, annual surgical volume, and travel time. Compared to \\\"one surgeon/no EC,\\\" \\\"three surgeons/daytime EC\\\" and \\\"seven surgeons/24 h EC\\\" were valued equivalent to 99 and 249 min travel time increases. \\\"Medium (≥ 1, < 6 cases/year)\\\" and \\\"high (≥ 6 cases/year)\\\" were preferred over \\\"low (< 1 case/year)\\\" surgical volumes, equivalent to 123 and 219 min increases. Availability of other specialists (64 min), advanced surgery (33 min), and lower complications (24 min) were also valued. Team-based care was less preferred (- 26 min).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parents support centralization of pediatric surgical facilities, placing greater emphasis on structural improvements than direct clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Surgery International\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Surgery International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-025-06165-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-025-06165-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在量化儿科外科设施集中化与降低可及性之间的权衡。方法:采用离散选择实验对高摫医院(2021年1月~ 2024年3月)新生儿患者的家长进行调查。假设医院有7个不同的属性:外科医生数量和急诊覆盖率(EC)、每年手术量、旅行时间、儿科专家的可用性、先进的手术能力、术后并发症发生率和主治医生系统。对每个属性的偏好和相对于旅行时间的边际替代率进行了估计。结果:我们分析了646份回复中的317组。外科医生数量、EC、每年手术量和旅行时间显著影响患者的选择。与“1名外科医生/无手术”相比,“3名外科医生/日间手术”和“7名外科医生/24小时手术”的价值相当于增加了99分钟和249分钟的旅行时间。“中等(≥1分),结论:家长支持儿科手术设施的集中化,更强调结构的改善,而不是直接的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parental preferences for pediatric surgical facility centralization: insights from a discrete choice experiment.

Purpose: This study aimed to quantify the trade-off between benefits of pediatric surgical facility centralization and reduced accessibility.

Methods: A discrete choice experiment was conducted among parents of neonatal patients at Takatsuki Hospital (January 2021 to March 2024). Hypothetical facilities with varying levels of seven attributes-surgeon numbers and emergency coverage (EC), annual surgical volume, travel time, availability of pediatric specialists, advanced surgical capability, postoperative complication rates, and primary physician system-were presented. Preferences for each attribute and marginal rates of substitution with respect to travel time were estimated.

Results: We analyzed 317 sets from 646 responses. Preferences were significantly influenced by surgeon numbers and EC, annual surgical volume, and travel time. Compared to "one surgeon/no EC," "three surgeons/daytime EC" and "seven surgeons/24 h EC" were valued equivalent to 99 and 249 min travel time increases. "Medium (≥ 1, < 6 cases/year)" and "high (≥ 6 cases/year)" were preferred over "low (< 1 case/year)" surgical volumes, equivalent to 123 and 219 min increases. Availability of other specialists (64 min), advanced surgery (33 min), and lower complications (24 min) were also valued. Team-based care was less preferred (- 26 min).

Conclusion: Parents support centralization of pediatric surgical facilities, placing greater emphasis on structural improvements than direct clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Surgery International is a journal devoted to the publication of new and important information from the entire spectrum of pediatric surgery. The major purpose of the journal is to promote postgraduate training and further education in the surgery of infants and children. The contents will include articles in clinical and experimental surgery, as well as related fields. One section of each issue is devoted to a special topic, with invited contributions from recognized authorities. Other sections will include: -Review articles- Original articles- Technical innovations- Letters to the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信