追踪放射学研究中的全球不平等:研究成果的多层次分析。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Siddig Ibrahim Abdelwahab, Manal Mohamed Elhassan Taha, Abdullah Farasani, Jobran M Moshi, Abrar Fahad Alshahrani, Ahmad Assiri, Saeed Alshahrani, Muhammad H Sultan, Khaled A Sahli, Hussam M Shubaily, Omer Ahmed Elrhima, Waseem Hassan
{"title":"追踪放射学研究中的全球不平等:研究成果的多层次分析。","authors":"Siddig Ibrahim Abdelwahab, Manal Mohamed Elhassan Taha, Abdullah Farasani, Jobran M Moshi, Abrar Fahad Alshahrani, Ahmad Assiri, Saeed Alshahrani, Muhammad H Sultan, Khaled A Sahli, Hussam M Shubaily, Omer Ahmed Elrhima, Waseem Hassan","doi":"10.1007/s00247-025-06388-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Authorship disparities in medical research are evident, particularly between high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LICs/LMICs). These disparities have been analyzed in recent publications in Pediatric Radiology journal, noting that between 2019 and 2022, no manuscripts from LICs and only 13 manuscripts from LMICs were published. To our knowledge, an extensive review of publication trends in Pediatric Radiology journal and in radiology word containing journals, with regard to LICs/LMICs disparities, is currently lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to assess historical trends and regional disparities in radiology research output and impact.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A three-pronged approach was used: (1) analysis of all original articles and reviews in Pediatric Radiology (1973-2024), distinguishing LMIC contributions with or without collaboration; (2) broader review of all Scopus-indexed journals with \"radiology*\" in the title (2001-2024), focusing on LMIC authorship; (3) comprehensive assessment of all Scopus-classified \"Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging\" publications (2021-2024), including output and citation data from 187 countries and various global regions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Pediatric Radiology, only 3.4% of the 8,907 articles involved LMIC collaborations, and 0.9% were authored by LMIC researchers. The number of annual independent LMIC contributions never exceeded 5 until recently. In journals containing \"radiology\" in the title, LMIC researchers contributed 2.3% of all articles through collaboration and 1.25% independently, with 2024 data revealing continued reliance on partnerships (476 collaborative vs. 276 independent LMIC articles). The USA contributed 53,474 publications (26.67%) and received 362,681 citations (33.75%), whereas China produced 44,851 publications (22.37%) with 237,884 citations (22.14%). Africa produced 4,375 publications and received 22,161 citations, Latin America contributed 4,150 publications with 30,061 citations, and South America generated 3,590 publications with 26,084 citations. The Middle East had the highest citation-per-publication ratio (6.1), followed by the Asia Pacific (5.7), the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (5.3), South Asia (5.2), and Africa (5.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data illustrate that LMICs remain underrepresented in radiology research. Targeted policy reforms, funding mechanisms, and capacity-building strategies are needed to enhance equity and support LMIC-driven radiology scholarship.</p>","PeriodicalId":19755,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracing global inequities in radiology research: a multi-level analysis of research output.\",\"authors\":\"Siddig Ibrahim Abdelwahab, Manal Mohamed Elhassan Taha, Abdullah Farasani, Jobran M Moshi, Abrar Fahad Alshahrani, Ahmad Assiri, Saeed Alshahrani, Muhammad H Sultan, Khaled A Sahli, Hussam M Shubaily, Omer Ahmed Elrhima, Waseem Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00247-025-06388-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Authorship disparities in medical research are evident, particularly between high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LICs/LMICs). These disparities have been analyzed in recent publications in Pediatric Radiology journal, noting that between 2019 and 2022, no manuscripts from LICs and only 13 manuscripts from LMICs were published. To our knowledge, an extensive review of publication trends in Pediatric Radiology journal and in radiology word containing journals, with regard to LICs/LMICs disparities, is currently lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to assess historical trends and regional disparities in radiology research output and impact.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A three-pronged approach was used: (1) analysis of all original articles and reviews in Pediatric Radiology (1973-2024), distinguishing LMIC contributions with or without collaboration; (2) broader review of all Scopus-indexed journals with \\\"radiology*\\\" in the title (2001-2024), focusing on LMIC authorship; (3) comprehensive assessment of all Scopus-classified \\\"Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging\\\" publications (2021-2024), including output and citation data from 187 countries and various global regions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Pediatric Radiology, only 3.4% of the 8,907 articles involved LMIC collaborations, and 0.9% were authored by LMIC researchers. The number of annual independent LMIC contributions never exceeded 5 until recently. In journals containing \\\"radiology\\\" in the title, LMIC researchers contributed 2.3% of all articles through collaboration and 1.25% independently, with 2024 data revealing continued reliance on partnerships (476 collaborative vs. 276 independent LMIC articles). The USA contributed 53,474 publications (26.67%) and received 362,681 citations (33.75%), whereas China produced 44,851 publications (22.37%) with 237,884 citations (22.14%). Africa produced 4,375 publications and received 22,161 citations, Latin America contributed 4,150 publications with 30,061 citations, and South America generated 3,590 publications with 26,084 citations. The Middle East had the highest citation-per-publication ratio (6.1), followed by the Asia Pacific (5.7), the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (5.3), South Asia (5.2), and Africa (5.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data illustrate that LMICs remain underrepresented in radiology research. Targeted policy reforms, funding mechanisms, and capacity-building strategies are needed to enhance equity and support LMIC-driven radiology scholarship.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-025-06388-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-025-06388-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医学研究的作者差异是明显的,特别是在高收入国家(HICs)和低收入和中等收入国家(lic /LMICs)之间。《儿科放射学》杂志最近发表的论文对这些差异进行了分析,指出2019年至2022年期间,没有来自低收入国家的论文发表,只有13篇来自低收入国家的论文发表。据我们所知,目前还缺乏关于低收入国家/低收入国家差异的儿科放射学期刊和放射学期刊出版趋势的广泛审查。目的:目的是评估放射学研究产出和影响的历史趋势和地区差异。材料和方法:采用了三管齐下的方法:(1)分析儿童放射学(1973-2024)的所有原始文章和综述,区分LMIC是否有合作的贡献;(2)对2001-2024年scopus检索的所有标题中包含“radiology*”的期刊进行更广泛的综述,重点关注LMIC作者;(3)综合评估所有scopus分类的“放射学、核医学和影像学”出版物(2021-2024),包括来自187个国家和全球各个地区的产出和引文数据。结果:在儿科放射学中,8907篇文章中只有3.4%涉及LMIC合作,0.9%由LMIC研究人员撰写。直到最近,低收入和中等收入国家每年独立捐款的数目从未超过5个。在标题中包含“放射学”的期刊中,LMIC研究人员通过合作贡献了2.3%的文章,独立贡献了1.25%,2024年的数据显示继续依赖合作伙伴关系(476篇合作文章对276篇独立的LMIC文章)。美国发表了53,474篇论文(26.67%),被引用362,681次(33.75%),而中国发表了44,851篇论文(22.37%),被引用237,884次(22.14%)。非洲出版了4 375份出版物,被引用22 161次;拉丁美洲出版了4 150份出版物,被引用300 061次;南美洲出版了3 590份出版物,被引用26 084次。中东地区的出版物引用率最高(6.1),其次是亚太地区(5.7)、伊斯兰合作组织(5.3)、南亚(5.2)和非洲(5.1)。结论:数据表明,中低收入国家在放射学研究中的代表性仍然不足。有针对性的政策改革、筹资机制和能力建设战略需要加强公平性并支持中低收入国家驱动的放射学奖学金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tracing global inequities in radiology research: a multi-level analysis of research output.

Background: Authorship disparities in medical research are evident, particularly between high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LICs/LMICs). These disparities have been analyzed in recent publications in Pediatric Radiology journal, noting that between 2019 and 2022, no manuscripts from LICs and only 13 manuscripts from LMICs were published. To our knowledge, an extensive review of publication trends in Pediatric Radiology journal and in radiology word containing journals, with regard to LICs/LMICs disparities, is currently lacking.

Objective: The objective was to assess historical trends and regional disparities in radiology research output and impact.

Materials and methods: A three-pronged approach was used: (1) analysis of all original articles and reviews in Pediatric Radiology (1973-2024), distinguishing LMIC contributions with or without collaboration; (2) broader review of all Scopus-indexed journals with "radiology*" in the title (2001-2024), focusing on LMIC authorship; (3) comprehensive assessment of all Scopus-classified "Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging" publications (2021-2024), including output and citation data from 187 countries and various global regions.

Results: In Pediatric Radiology, only 3.4% of the 8,907 articles involved LMIC collaborations, and 0.9% were authored by LMIC researchers. The number of annual independent LMIC contributions never exceeded 5 until recently. In journals containing "radiology" in the title, LMIC researchers contributed 2.3% of all articles through collaboration and 1.25% independently, with 2024 data revealing continued reliance on partnerships (476 collaborative vs. 276 independent LMIC articles). The USA contributed 53,474 publications (26.67%) and received 362,681 citations (33.75%), whereas China produced 44,851 publications (22.37%) with 237,884 citations (22.14%). Africa produced 4,375 publications and received 22,161 citations, Latin America contributed 4,150 publications with 30,061 citations, and South America generated 3,590 publications with 26,084 citations. The Middle East had the highest citation-per-publication ratio (6.1), followed by the Asia Pacific (5.7), the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (5.3), South Asia (5.2), and Africa (5.1).

Conclusion: The data illustrate that LMICs remain underrepresented in radiology research. Targeted policy reforms, funding mechanisms, and capacity-building strategies are needed to enhance equity and support LMIC-driven radiology scholarship.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Radiology
Pediatric Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Asian and Oceanic Society for Pediatric Radiology Pediatric Radiology informs its readers of new findings and progress in all areas of pediatric imaging and in related fields. This is achieved by a blend of original papers, complemented by reviews that set out the present state of knowledge in a particular area of the specialty or summarize specific topics in which discussion has led to clear conclusions. Advances in technology, methodology, apparatus and auxiliary equipment are presented, and modifications of standard techniques are described. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信