60天外周神经刺激治疗慢性膝关节疼痛:回顾性分析。

IF 2.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Reviews Pub Date : 2025-08-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.52965/001c.143096
Jamal Hasoon, Alexander Rothkrug, Grant H Chen, R Jason Yong, Christopher L Robinson
{"title":"60天外周神经刺激治疗慢性膝关节疼痛:回顾性分析。","authors":"Jamal Hasoon, Alexander Rothkrug, Grant H Chen, R Jason Yong, Christopher L Robinson","doi":"10.52965/001c.143096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic knee pain has seen a significant rise over the past two decades, leading to increased functional limitations, mobility challenges, and decreased quality of life. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is an alternative management approach for chronic knee pain across various conditions. PNS involves implanting an electrode near a targeted nerve to deliver electrical stimulation, which interrupts pain signals, providing pain relief. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a 60-day PNS system in treating chronic knee pain and includes a comparison to a control group receiving conventional medical management (CMM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective database and chart review study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a 60-day PNS system for managing chronic knee pain. Data were sourced from the device manufacturer's database, which included treatment records from two experienced interventional chronic pain physicians. The analysis focused on patients treated with the 60-day PNS therapy for chronic knee pain. The patient population consisted of individuals who received the PNS therapy specifically for knee pain under the care of the two experienced interventional chronic pain physicians, ensuring consistency in treatment application. Additionally, a chart review of 12 patients with similar pain complaints treated with CMM during the same time period was conducted to serve as a comparison group. Responder status was defined as achieving ≥ 50% pain relief.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen patients were identified who underwent PNS-therapy, and 94.4% (17/18) of the patients achieved ≥ 50% pain relief (responders) following the 60-day percutaneous PNS therapy. The weighted average of relief among responders was determined to be 82.3%. In the CMM control group, only 33.3% (4/12) of patients met the responder threshold, with an average relief of 61.3% among responders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study findings suggest that a 60-day percutaneous PNS targeting lower extremity nerves can effectively manage chronic knee pain. Further research is needed to determine the long-term efficacy of this treatment for various pain conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"17 ","pages":"143096"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"60-Day Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Chronic Knee Pain: A Retrospective Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jamal Hasoon, Alexander Rothkrug, Grant H Chen, R Jason Yong, Christopher L Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.52965/001c.143096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic knee pain has seen a significant rise over the past two decades, leading to increased functional limitations, mobility challenges, and decreased quality of life. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is an alternative management approach for chronic knee pain across various conditions. PNS involves implanting an electrode near a targeted nerve to deliver electrical stimulation, which interrupts pain signals, providing pain relief. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a 60-day PNS system in treating chronic knee pain and includes a comparison to a control group receiving conventional medical management (CMM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective database and chart review study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a 60-day PNS system for managing chronic knee pain. Data were sourced from the device manufacturer's database, which included treatment records from two experienced interventional chronic pain physicians. The analysis focused on patients treated with the 60-day PNS therapy for chronic knee pain. The patient population consisted of individuals who received the PNS therapy specifically for knee pain under the care of the two experienced interventional chronic pain physicians, ensuring consistency in treatment application. Additionally, a chart review of 12 patients with similar pain complaints treated with CMM during the same time period was conducted to serve as a comparison group. Responder status was defined as achieving ≥ 50% pain relief.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen patients were identified who underwent PNS-therapy, and 94.4% (17/18) of the patients achieved ≥ 50% pain relief (responders) following the 60-day percutaneous PNS therapy. The weighted average of relief among responders was determined to be 82.3%. In the CMM control group, only 33.3% (4/12) of patients met the responder threshold, with an average relief of 61.3% among responders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study findings suggest that a 60-day percutaneous PNS targeting lower extremity nerves can effectively manage chronic knee pain. Further research is needed to determine the long-term efficacy of this treatment for various pain conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopedic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"143096\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372923/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopedic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.143096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.143096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的二十年中,慢性膝关节疼痛显著增加,导致功能限制增加,活动能力挑战,生活质量下降。外周神经刺激(PNS)是治疗各种慢性膝关节疼痛的另一种治疗方法。PNS包括在目标神经附近植入一个电极来传递电刺激,从而中断疼痛信号,缓解疼痛。本研究评估了60天PNS系统治疗慢性膝关节疼痛的有效性,并与接受常规医疗管理(CMM)的对照组进行了比较。方法:本回顾性数据库和图表回顾研究旨在评估60天PNS系统治疗慢性膝关节疼痛的有效性。数据来源于器械制造商的数据库,其中包括两位经验丰富的介入性慢性疼痛医生的治疗记录。分析的重点是接受60天PNS治疗慢性膝关节疼痛的患者。患者群体由在两位经验丰富的介入性慢性疼痛医生的护理下接受专门针对膝关节疼痛的PNS治疗的个体组成,以确保治疗应用的一致性。此外,对12名在同一时间段内接受CMM治疗的疼痛症状相似的患者进行图表回顾,作为对照组。应答者状态定义为达到≥50%的疼痛缓解。结果:18例患者接受PNS治疗,经60天经皮PNS治疗后,94.4%(17/18)的患者疼痛缓解≥50%(应答者)。应答者的加权平均缓解率为82.3%。在CMM对照组中,只有33.3%(4/12)的患者达到应答阈值,应答者平均缓解率为61.3%。结论:研究结果表明,针对下肢神经的60天经皮PNS可以有效地治疗慢性膝关节疼痛。需要进一步的研究来确定这种治疗对各种疼痛状况的长期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
60-Day Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Chronic Knee Pain: A Retrospective Analysis.

Introduction: Chronic knee pain has seen a significant rise over the past two decades, leading to increased functional limitations, mobility challenges, and decreased quality of life. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is an alternative management approach for chronic knee pain across various conditions. PNS involves implanting an electrode near a targeted nerve to deliver electrical stimulation, which interrupts pain signals, providing pain relief. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a 60-day PNS system in treating chronic knee pain and includes a comparison to a control group receiving conventional medical management (CMM).

Methods: This retrospective database and chart review study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a 60-day PNS system for managing chronic knee pain. Data were sourced from the device manufacturer's database, which included treatment records from two experienced interventional chronic pain physicians. The analysis focused on patients treated with the 60-day PNS therapy for chronic knee pain. The patient population consisted of individuals who received the PNS therapy specifically for knee pain under the care of the two experienced interventional chronic pain physicians, ensuring consistency in treatment application. Additionally, a chart review of 12 patients with similar pain complaints treated with CMM during the same time period was conducted to serve as a comparison group. Responder status was defined as achieving ≥ 50% pain relief.

Results: Eighteen patients were identified who underwent PNS-therapy, and 94.4% (17/18) of the patients achieved ≥ 50% pain relief (responders) following the 60-day percutaneous PNS therapy. The weighted average of relief among responders was determined to be 82.3%. In the CMM control group, only 33.3% (4/12) of patients met the responder threshold, with an average relief of 61.3% among responders.

Conclusions: The study findings suggest that a 60-day percutaneous PNS targeting lower extremity nerves can effectively manage chronic knee pain. Further research is needed to determine the long-term efficacy of this treatment for various pain conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopedic Reviews
Orthopedic Reviews ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信