Jia Yi Tan, Yong Hao Yeo, Qi Xuan Ang, Arya Mariam Roy, Nishi Shah, Jon E Arnason, Talal Hilal
{"title":"心血管合并症与美国CAR - t细胞治疗患者住院结果的关系","authors":"Jia Yi Tan, Yong Hao Yeo, Qi Xuan Ang, Arya Mariam Roy, Nishi Shah, Jon E Arnason, Talal Hilal","doi":"10.1159/000548191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With expanding indications for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, more patients with diverse clinical profiles are receiving treatment, some of whom may not have been eligible to enroll on the pivotal clinical trials. The impact of preexisting cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) on the outcomes of CAR-T recipients remains understudied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of preexisting CVD on in-hospital outcomes among patients who received CAR-T therapy using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2018 to 2020. We analyzed patients aged ≥18 and compared outcomes between those with and without preexisting CVD, utilizing sampling weights for national estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After weighting, the cohort included 4,950 patients: 2,312 (46.7%) and 2,638 (53.3%) with and without preexisting CV, respectively. Patients with preexisting CVD experienced significantly higher rates of acute heart failure (2.9% vs. 0.7%; p = 0.01), myocardial infarction (2.2% vs. 0.9%; p < 0.01), cerebrovascular accidents (1.4% vs. 0.7%; p < 0.01), and acute kidney injury (19.2% vs. 13.3%; p < 0.01). Rates of cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and pulmonary embolism were comparable between these 2 groups. Multivariate analysis showed preexisting CVD was not associated with increased odds of early mortality {adjusted odd ratios (aOR) = 1.01 (95% confidence intervals [CIs], 0.69-1.49), p = 0.95}, prolonged index hospitalization (aOR = 0.94 [95% CI, 0.64-1.36], p = 0.73), non-home discharge (aOR 1.04 [95% CI, 0.79-1.38], p = 0.77), and 30-day readmission (aOR 0.99 [95% CI, 0.81-1.20], p = 0.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although there were significant differences in acute complications, our study reinforces that the presence of CVD does not adversely affect early mortality rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Cardiovascular Comorbidities on in-Hospital Outcomes of CAR T-Cell Therapy Recipients in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Jia Yi Tan, Yong Hao Yeo, Qi Xuan Ang, Arya Mariam Roy, Nishi Shah, Jon E Arnason, Talal Hilal\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000548191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With expanding indications for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, more patients with diverse clinical profiles are receiving treatment, some of whom may not have been eligible to enroll on the pivotal clinical trials. The impact of preexisting cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) on the outcomes of CAR-T recipients remains understudied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of preexisting CVD on in-hospital outcomes among patients who received CAR-T therapy using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2018 to 2020. We analyzed patients aged ≥18 and compared outcomes between those with and without preexisting CVD, utilizing sampling weights for national estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After weighting, the cohort included 4,950 patients: 2,312 (46.7%) and 2,638 (53.3%) with and without preexisting CV, respectively. Patients with preexisting CVD experienced significantly higher rates of acute heart failure (2.9% vs. 0.7%; p = 0.01), myocardial infarction (2.2% vs. 0.9%; p < 0.01), cerebrovascular accidents (1.4% vs. 0.7%; p < 0.01), and acute kidney injury (19.2% vs. 13.3%; p < 0.01). Rates of cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and pulmonary embolism were comparable between these 2 groups. Multivariate analysis showed preexisting CVD was not associated with increased odds of early mortality {adjusted odd ratios (aOR) = 1.01 (95% confidence intervals [CIs], 0.69-1.49), p = 0.95}, prolonged index hospitalization (aOR = 0.94 [95% CI, 0.64-1.36], p = 0.73), non-home discharge (aOR 1.04 [95% CI, 0.79-1.38], p = 0.77), and 30-day readmission (aOR 0.99 [95% CI, 0.81-1.20], p = 0.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although there were significant differences in acute complications, our study reinforces that the presence of CVD does not adversely affect early mortality rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548191\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548191","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
随着嵌合抗原受体t细胞(CAR-T)治疗适应症的扩大,越来越多具有不同临床特征的患者正在接受治疗,其中一些患者可能没有资格参加关键临床试验。预先存在的心血管疾病(CVD)对CAR-T受体结果的影响仍未得到充分研究。方法:本研究旨在利用2018-2020年全国再入院数据库(NRD)评估既往心血管疾病对接受CAR-T治疗的患者住院结局的影响。我们分析了年龄≥18岁的患者,并比较了患有和不患有心血管疾病的患者的结果,使用抽样权重进行全国估计。加权后,该队列包括4950例患者:分别有2312例(46.7%)和2638例(53.3%)存在和不存在既往CV。既往存在心血管疾病的患者急性心力衰竭(2.9% vs. 0.7%, P=0.01)、心肌梗死(2.2% vs. 0.9%, P=0.01)的发生率明显更高
Association of Cardiovascular Comorbidities on in-Hospital Outcomes of CAR T-Cell Therapy Recipients in the United States.
Introduction: With expanding indications for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, more patients with diverse clinical profiles are receiving treatment, some of whom may not have been eligible to enroll on the pivotal clinical trials. The impact of preexisting cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) on the outcomes of CAR-T recipients remains understudied.
Methods: Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of preexisting CVD on in-hospital outcomes among patients who received CAR-T therapy using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2018 to 2020. We analyzed patients aged ≥18 and compared outcomes between those with and without preexisting CVD, utilizing sampling weights for national estimates.
Results: After weighting, the cohort included 4,950 patients: 2,312 (46.7%) and 2,638 (53.3%) with and without preexisting CV, respectively. Patients with preexisting CVD experienced significantly higher rates of acute heart failure (2.9% vs. 0.7%; p = 0.01), myocardial infarction (2.2% vs. 0.9%; p < 0.01), cerebrovascular accidents (1.4% vs. 0.7%; p < 0.01), and acute kidney injury (19.2% vs. 13.3%; p < 0.01). Rates of cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and pulmonary embolism were comparable between these 2 groups. Multivariate analysis showed preexisting CVD was not associated with increased odds of early mortality {adjusted odd ratios (aOR) = 1.01 (95% confidence intervals [CIs], 0.69-1.49), p = 0.95}, prolonged index hospitalization (aOR = 0.94 [95% CI, 0.64-1.36], p = 0.73), non-home discharge (aOR 1.04 [95% CI, 0.79-1.38], p = 0.77), and 30-day readmission (aOR 0.99 [95% CI, 0.81-1.20], p = 0.91).
Conclusion: Although there were significant differences in acute complications, our study reinforces that the presence of CVD does not adversely affect early mortality rates.
期刊介绍:
Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.