{"title":"番木瓜叶提取物是否能影响化疗诱导的血小板减少症?系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Anca Mîrșu-Păun","doi":"10.1177/02601060251367802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) impacts a significant number of patients undergoing oncological treatment. <b>Aim:</b> This study explored the usefulness of <i>Carica papaya</i> leaf extract (CPLE) in the context of CIT, including side effect and optimal treatment dosage and duration. <b>Methods:</b> Systematic literature reviews were conducted on (a) studies of patients with solid tumors and CIT who received CPLE, and (b) animal studies focused on CPLE for CIT. Risk of bias was assessed and meta-analyses were conducted. <b>Results:</b> In the meta-analysis of studies on oncological patients with CIT (total <i>N</i> = 410, intervention <i>N</i> = 205), the overall effect size for CPLE administration was 2.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96-3.44, <i>P</i> < 0.001. In the meta-analysis on animal models (total <i>N</i> = 84, intervention <i>N</i> = 42), two effect sizes were computed for two platelet measurements at different time intervals: 5.74, 95% CI: 0.32 = 11.16, <i>P</i> < 0.001 and 7.13, 95% CI: 4.23-10.02, <i>P</i> < 0.001, respectively. CPLE dosage varied between 580 and 3300 mg, with a mean of 1500 mg per day. No studies reported major side effects of CPLE administration. <b>Conclusion:</b> Despite heterogeneity and risk of bias concerns, the research literature available so far of both animal models and human participants suggests that CPLE might be an effective strategy for dealing with CIT. However, more rigorous research is still needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19352,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and health","volume":" ","pages":"2601060251367802"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Could <i>Carica papaya</i> leaf extract impact chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Anca Mîrșu-Păun\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02601060251367802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) impacts a significant number of patients undergoing oncological treatment. <b>Aim:</b> This study explored the usefulness of <i>Carica papaya</i> leaf extract (CPLE) in the context of CIT, including side effect and optimal treatment dosage and duration. <b>Methods:</b> Systematic literature reviews were conducted on (a) studies of patients with solid tumors and CIT who received CPLE, and (b) animal studies focused on CPLE for CIT. Risk of bias was assessed and meta-analyses were conducted. <b>Results:</b> In the meta-analysis of studies on oncological patients with CIT (total <i>N</i> = 410, intervention <i>N</i> = 205), the overall effect size for CPLE administration was 2.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96-3.44, <i>P</i> < 0.001. In the meta-analysis on animal models (total <i>N</i> = 84, intervention <i>N</i> = 42), two effect sizes were computed for two platelet measurements at different time intervals: 5.74, 95% CI: 0.32 = 11.16, <i>P</i> < 0.001 and 7.13, 95% CI: 4.23-10.02, <i>P</i> < 0.001, respectively. CPLE dosage varied between 580 and 3300 mg, with a mean of 1500 mg per day. No studies reported major side effects of CPLE administration. <b>Conclusion:</b> Despite heterogeneity and risk of bias concerns, the research literature available so far of both animal models and human participants suggests that CPLE might be an effective strategy for dealing with CIT. However, more rigorous research is still needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition and health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2601060251367802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060251367802\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060251367802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:化疗引起的血小板减少症(CIT)影响了大量接受肿瘤治疗的患者。目的:探讨番木瓜叶提取物(CPLE)在CIT治疗中的作用,包括副作用、最佳治疗剂量和持续时间。方法:对(a)实体肿瘤和CIT患者接受CPLE治疗的研究,(b) CIT患者接受CPLE治疗的动物研究进行系统文献综述,评估偏倚风险并进行meta分析。结果:在肿瘤性CIT患者研究(总N = 410,干预N = 205)的meta分析中,CPLE给药的总体效应量为2.20,95%可信区间(CI): 0.96 ~ 3.44, P N = 84,干预N = 42),两种不同时间间隔血小板测量的效应量分别为5.74,95% CI: 0.32 = 11.16, P P。尽管存在异质性和偏倚风险的问题,但迄今为止对动物模型和人类参与者的研究文献表明,CPLE可能是应对CIT的有效策略,但仍需要更严格的研究。
Could Carica papaya leaf extract impact chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) impacts a significant number of patients undergoing oncological treatment. Aim: This study explored the usefulness of Carica papaya leaf extract (CPLE) in the context of CIT, including side effect and optimal treatment dosage and duration. Methods: Systematic literature reviews were conducted on (a) studies of patients with solid tumors and CIT who received CPLE, and (b) animal studies focused on CPLE for CIT. Risk of bias was assessed and meta-analyses were conducted. Results: In the meta-analysis of studies on oncological patients with CIT (total N = 410, intervention N = 205), the overall effect size for CPLE administration was 2.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96-3.44, P < 0.001. In the meta-analysis on animal models (total N = 84, intervention N = 42), two effect sizes were computed for two platelet measurements at different time intervals: 5.74, 95% CI: 0.32 = 11.16, P < 0.001 and 7.13, 95% CI: 4.23-10.02, P < 0.001, respectively. CPLE dosage varied between 580 and 3300 mg, with a mean of 1500 mg per day. No studies reported major side effects of CPLE administration. Conclusion: Despite heterogeneity and risk of bias concerns, the research literature available so far of both animal models and human participants suggests that CPLE might be an effective strategy for dealing with CIT. However, more rigorous research is still needed.