乙状窦后锁眼入路通向桥小脑角:一种改良的手术技术和脑脊液瘘管的评价。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Daniel Staribacher, Dzmitry Kuzmin, Iván N Camal Ruggieri, Gavin Britz, Guenther C Feigl
{"title":"乙状窦后锁眼入路通向桥小脑角:一种改良的手术技术和脑脊液瘘管的评价。","authors":"Daniel Staribacher, Dzmitry Kuzmin, Iván N Camal Ruggieri, Gavin Britz, Guenther C Feigl","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03756-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a common postoperative complication after suboccipital craniotomies and can develop into a potentially life-threatening situation. Advances in dural replacement materials have revolutionized the treatment of CSF leaks and provide innovative alternatives to traditional repair methods. Synthetic and biological dural replacement materials, as well as fibrin sealants and tissue engineering approaches, offer improved durabilit, biocompatibility, and regenerative properties. However, to avoid complications associated with biomaterials and to minimize the use of dural substitutes whenever possible, careful surgical technique is essential for dural closure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the utility of a modified surgical technique for the retrosigmoid keyhole approach in reducing postoperative CSF leaks. A total of 168 consecutive patients were included in this retrospective study. All of them underwent surgery between 2015 and 2024 at our clinic for lesions in the cerebellopontine angle. A retrosigmoid keyhole approach was used in all cases. Two patients (1.2%) of the 168 developed a postoperative CSF leak: 1 (0.6%) incisional and 1 (0.6%) non-incisional. None of them developed CSF leak-related meningitis. The small retrosigmoid approach combined with the sandwich dural closure technique proved effective in reducing postoperative CSF leakage. While biomaterials contribute to improved dural sealing, careful surgical handling of posterior fossa structures remains essential for optimal outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"617"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The retrosigmoid keyhole approach to the cerebellopontine angle: a modified surgical technique and the evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid fistulas.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Staribacher, Dzmitry Kuzmin, Iván N Camal Ruggieri, Gavin Britz, Guenther C Feigl\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10143-025-03756-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a common postoperative complication after suboccipital craniotomies and can develop into a potentially life-threatening situation. Advances in dural replacement materials have revolutionized the treatment of CSF leaks and provide innovative alternatives to traditional repair methods. Synthetic and biological dural replacement materials, as well as fibrin sealants and tissue engineering approaches, offer improved durabilit, biocompatibility, and regenerative properties. However, to avoid complications associated with biomaterials and to minimize the use of dural substitutes whenever possible, careful surgical technique is essential for dural closure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the utility of a modified surgical technique for the retrosigmoid keyhole approach in reducing postoperative CSF leaks. A total of 168 consecutive patients were included in this retrospective study. All of them underwent surgery between 2015 and 2024 at our clinic for lesions in the cerebellopontine angle. A retrosigmoid keyhole approach was used in all cases. Two patients (1.2%) of the 168 developed a postoperative CSF leak: 1 (0.6%) incisional and 1 (0.6%) non-incisional. None of them developed CSF leak-related meningitis. The small retrosigmoid approach combined with the sandwich dural closure technique proved effective in reducing postoperative CSF leakage. While biomaterials contribute to improved dural sealing, careful surgical handling of posterior fossa structures remains essential for optimal outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"617\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03756-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03756-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脑脊液(CSF)渗漏是枕下开颅术后常见的并发症,并可能发展成潜在的危及生命的情况。硬脑膜替代材料的进步彻底改变了脑脊液泄漏的治疗方法,并为传统的修复方法提供了创新的替代方案。合成和生物硬脑膜替代材料,以及纤维蛋白密封剂和组织工程方法,提供了更好的耐用性、生物相容性和再生性能。然而,为了避免与生物材料相关的并发症,并尽可能减少硬脑膜替代物的使用,在硬脑膜闭合术中,谨慎的手术技术是必不可少的。因此,本研究的目的是分析乙状窦后锁孔入路改良手术技术在减少术后脑脊液泄漏中的应用。本回顾性研究共纳入168例连续患者。所有患者均于2015年至2024年间因桥小脑角病变在我院接受手术治疗。所有病例均采用乙状结肠后锁孔入路。168例患者中有2例(1.2%)发生术后脑脊液泄漏:1例(0.6%)切口,1例(0.6%)非切口。他们都没有患上脑脊液漏相关的脑膜炎。乙状窦后小入路联合夹心硬脑膜闭合技术可有效减少术后脑脊液漏。虽然生物材料有助于改善硬脑膜密封,但小心的手术处理后窝结构仍然是获得最佳结果的必要条件。临床试验编号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The retrosigmoid keyhole approach to the cerebellopontine angle: a modified surgical technique and the evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid fistulas.

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a common postoperative complication after suboccipital craniotomies and can develop into a potentially life-threatening situation. Advances in dural replacement materials have revolutionized the treatment of CSF leaks and provide innovative alternatives to traditional repair methods. Synthetic and biological dural replacement materials, as well as fibrin sealants and tissue engineering approaches, offer improved durabilit, biocompatibility, and regenerative properties. However, to avoid complications associated with biomaterials and to minimize the use of dural substitutes whenever possible, careful surgical technique is essential for dural closure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the utility of a modified surgical technique for the retrosigmoid keyhole approach in reducing postoperative CSF leaks. A total of 168 consecutive patients were included in this retrospective study. All of them underwent surgery between 2015 and 2024 at our clinic for lesions in the cerebellopontine angle. A retrosigmoid keyhole approach was used in all cases. Two patients (1.2%) of the 168 developed a postoperative CSF leak: 1 (0.6%) incisional and 1 (0.6%) non-incisional. None of them developed CSF leak-related meningitis. The small retrosigmoid approach combined with the sandwich dural closure technique proved effective in reducing postoperative CSF leakage. While biomaterials contribute to improved dural sealing, careful surgical handling of posterior fossa structures remains essential for optimal outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信