Stavros Matsoukas, Sean Inzerillo, Arianne Boylan, Patrick C Reid, Konstantinos Margetis, Divaldo Camara
{"title":"创伤性脑损伤患者使用损伤前抗血小板与抗凝血药物的结局:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Stavros Matsoukas, Sean Inzerillo, Arianne Boylan, Patrick C Reid, Konstantinos Margetis, Divaldo Camara","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03780-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients on pre-TBI antithrombotic medications poses a clinical challenge in everyday practice. However, the safety profiles of antiplatelets (APs) have not been systematically studied and compared to anticoagulants (ACs) in this patient population. In this PRISMA-compliant systematic review the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were systematically queried to identify comparative studies in patients with TBI and pre-injury AP and AC medications. Meta-analysis with random effect models were conducted for all outcomes. Forest plots were utilized to visually represent each study's effect and pooled estimates. Intracranial hemorrhage rates were statistically significantly higher for patients on single AP vs. AC (AP 19.7%; AC 9.3%; OR 1.35; CI 1.02-1.78; I<sup>2</sup> 49%, P = 0.03). Cumulative mortality rates (AP 6%; AC 2.5%; OR 0.72; CI; 0.39-1.32 I<sup>2</sup> 55%, P = 0.3), worsening ICH rates (AP 0.3%; AC 0.4%; OR 0.85; CI 0.16-4.55; I<sup>2</sup> 0%, P = 0.8) and need for neurosurgical intervention (AP 2.6%; AC 0.9%; OR 1.27; CI 0.48-3.39; I<sup>2</sup> 68%, P = 0.6) were comparable. For elderly patients (> 65 years old), ICH rates were comparable between groups (AP 46.8%; AC 28.3%; OR 1.03; CI 0.57-1.85; I<sup>2</sup> 66%, P = 0.9) and mortality was statistically significantly lower in the AP group (AP 19.4%; AC 29.5%; OR 0.46; CI 0.31-0.69; I<sup>2</sup> 0%, P < 0.001). Single pre-TBI AP carries more risk for ICH compared to AC. Mortality risk, worsening ICH risk and need for neurosurgical intervention are comparable. For elderly patients, ICH rates were comparable, but APs were associated with lower mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"622"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes following traumatic brain injury in patients with Pre-Injury antiplatelets versus anticoagulants: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Stavros Matsoukas, Sean Inzerillo, Arianne Boylan, Patrick C Reid, Konstantinos Margetis, Divaldo Camara\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10143-025-03780-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients on pre-TBI antithrombotic medications poses a clinical challenge in everyday practice. However, the safety profiles of antiplatelets (APs) have not been systematically studied and compared to anticoagulants (ACs) in this patient population. In this PRISMA-compliant systematic review the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were systematically queried to identify comparative studies in patients with TBI and pre-injury AP and AC medications. Meta-analysis with random effect models were conducted for all outcomes. Forest plots were utilized to visually represent each study's effect and pooled estimates. Intracranial hemorrhage rates were statistically significantly higher for patients on single AP vs. AC (AP 19.7%; AC 9.3%; OR 1.35; CI 1.02-1.78; I<sup>2</sup> 49%, P = 0.03). Cumulative mortality rates (AP 6%; AC 2.5%; OR 0.72; CI; 0.39-1.32 I<sup>2</sup> 55%, P = 0.3), worsening ICH rates (AP 0.3%; AC 0.4%; OR 0.85; CI 0.16-4.55; I<sup>2</sup> 0%, P = 0.8) and need for neurosurgical intervention (AP 2.6%; AC 0.9%; OR 1.27; CI 0.48-3.39; I<sup>2</sup> 68%, P = 0.6) were comparable. For elderly patients (> 65 years old), ICH rates were comparable between groups (AP 46.8%; AC 28.3%; OR 1.03; CI 0.57-1.85; I<sup>2</sup> 66%, P = 0.9) and mortality was statistically significantly lower in the AP group (AP 19.4%; AC 29.5%; OR 0.46; CI 0.31-0.69; I<sup>2</sup> 0%, P < 0.001). Single pre-TBI AP carries more risk for ICH compared to AC. Mortality risk, worsening ICH risk and need for neurosurgical intervention are comparable. For elderly patients, ICH rates were comparable, but APs were associated with lower mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"622\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03780-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03780-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者在TBI前抗血栓药物治疗的管理在日常实践中提出了临床挑战。然而,在这一患者群体中,抗血小板(APs)的安全性还没有系统的研究,也没有与抗凝血剂(ACs)进行比较。在这篇符合prisma的系统综述中,系统地查询了EMBASE和MEDLINE数据库,以确定TBI患者与损伤前AP和AC药物的比较研究。所有结果采用随机效应模型进行meta分析。利用森林样地直观地表示每个研究的效果和汇总估计。单纯AP组颅内出血率高于AC组(AP 19.7%; AC 9.3%; OR 1.35; CI 1.02-1.78; I2 49%, P = 0.03)。累积死亡率(AP 6%; AC 2.5%; OR 0.72; CI 0.39-1.32 I2 55%, P = 0.3)、恶化的ICH发生率(AP 0.3%; AC 0.4%; OR 0.85; CI 0.16-4.55; I2 0%, P = 0.8)和需要神经外科干预(AP 2.6%; AC 0.9%; OR 1.27; CI 0.48-3.39; I2 68%, P = 0.6)具有可比性。对于老年患者(bb0 ~ 65岁),两组间ICH发生率具有可比性(AP 46.8%; AC 28.3%; OR 1.03; CI 0.57 ~ 1.85; I2 66%, P = 0.9), AP组死亡率显著低于AP组(AP 19.4%; AC 29.5%; OR 0.46; CI 0.31 ~ 0.69
Outcomes following traumatic brain injury in patients with Pre-Injury antiplatelets versus anticoagulants: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis.
Management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients on pre-TBI antithrombotic medications poses a clinical challenge in everyday practice. However, the safety profiles of antiplatelets (APs) have not been systematically studied and compared to anticoagulants (ACs) in this patient population. In this PRISMA-compliant systematic review the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were systematically queried to identify comparative studies in patients with TBI and pre-injury AP and AC medications. Meta-analysis with random effect models were conducted for all outcomes. Forest plots were utilized to visually represent each study's effect and pooled estimates. Intracranial hemorrhage rates were statistically significantly higher for patients on single AP vs. AC (AP 19.7%; AC 9.3%; OR 1.35; CI 1.02-1.78; I2 49%, P = 0.03). Cumulative mortality rates (AP 6%; AC 2.5%; OR 0.72; CI; 0.39-1.32 I2 55%, P = 0.3), worsening ICH rates (AP 0.3%; AC 0.4%; OR 0.85; CI 0.16-4.55; I2 0%, P = 0.8) and need for neurosurgical intervention (AP 2.6%; AC 0.9%; OR 1.27; CI 0.48-3.39; I2 68%, P = 0.6) were comparable. For elderly patients (> 65 years old), ICH rates were comparable between groups (AP 46.8%; AC 28.3%; OR 1.03; CI 0.57-1.85; I2 66%, P = 0.9) and mortality was statistically significantly lower in the AP group (AP 19.4%; AC 29.5%; OR 0.46; CI 0.31-0.69; I2 0%, P < 0.001). Single pre-TBI AP carries more risk for ICH compared to AC. Mortality risk, worsening ICH risk and need for neurosurgical intervention are comparable. For elderly patients, ICH rates were comparable, but APs were associated with lower mortality.
期刊介绍:
The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.