了解双重治疗和急诊科在偏头痛护理中的应用机会。

IF 3.2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-20 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200519
Janine Moore, Alexis Kurek, Kimberly Vo, Kennedy Boone-Sautter, Grace Jipping, Aiesha Ahmed
{"title":"了解双重治疗和急诊科在偏头痛护理中的应用机会。","authors":"Janine Moore, Alexis Kurek, Kimberly Vo, Kennedy Boone-Sautter, Grace Jipping, Aiesha Ahmed","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Value-based payment (VBP) models require organizations to understand conditions that are contributing to spending and utilization above negotiated targets. Headache was a top 10 reason for an emergency department (ED) visit in 2022. The high utilization continued with more than 2,000 ED visits for migraine in 2023. Nearly all these visits resulted in same-day discharge home, suggesting these may be avoidable. A Payvider council was used to affect medical policy change, and dual therapy for migraine treatment (concurrent use of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide medications and onabotulinumtoxinA) was approved for coverage in May 2023. This study provides insight into the effect on cost and ED utilization of the medical policy change enabling dual therapy treatment of migraine by comparing cost for pharmacy and ED utilization across monotherapy or dual therapy patient groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with a prescription for 1 (monotherapy) or both (dual therapy) medications of interest with an ED encounter for migraine were reviewed. Based on the medications prescribed, patients were classified as receiving monotherapy or dual therapy for the treatment of migraine. The rates of emergency department utilization, ED utilization costs, and pharmacy costs were compared between the groups. This analysis was extrapolated to the larger migraine population within the organization to understand the cost effect of changing migraine management to the organization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred fifty-seven health plan members used the ED posttreatment between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023. A significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.02) in ED utilization was observed between monotherapy (31.9%, n = 93%) and dual therapy (16.7% n = 11%) patients during the study period. No difference was noted between groups in rate of ED use for patients using the ED. Cost savings associated with ED avoidance, approximately $782 per patient between monotherapy and dual therapy, were insufficient to balance the increased pharmacy cost, which was calculated as approximately $7,115.88 annually per patient based on average wholesale price.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Dual therapy for migraine had a positive effect on ED visit utilization in our sample while also having cost implications. Health care systems and neurology providers may benefit from this assessment when establishing migraine care, developing data structures, and planning for VBP models.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 5","pages":"e200519"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Opportunities in Dual Therapy and Emergency Department Utilization in Migraine Care.\",\"authors\":\"Janine Moore, Alexis Kurek, Kimberly Vo, Kennedy Boone-Sautter, Grace Jipping, Aiesha Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Value-based payment (VBP) models require organizations to understand conditions that are contributing to spending and utilization above negotiated targets. Headache was a top 10 reason for an emergency department (ED) visit in 2022. The high utilization continued with more than 2,000 ED visits for migraine in 2023. Nearly all these visits resulted in same-day discharge home, suggesting these may be avoidable. A Payvider council was used to affect medical policy change, and dual therapy for migraine treatment (concurrent use of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide medications and onabotulinumtoxinA) was approved for coverage in May 2023. This study provides insight into the effect on cost and ED utilization of the medical policy change enabling dual therapy treatment of migraine by comparing cost for pharmacy and ED utilization across monotherapy or dual therapy patient groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with a prescription for 1 (monotherapy) or both (dual therapy) medications of interest with an ED encounter for migraine were reviewed. Based on the medications prescribed, patients were classified as receiving monotherapy or dual therapy for the treatment of migraine. The rates of emergency department utilization, ED utilization costs, and pharmacy costs were compared between the groups. This analysis was extrapolated to the larger migraine population within the organization to understand the cost effect of changing migraine management to the organization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred fifty-seven health plan members used the ED posttreatment between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023. A significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.02) in ED utilization was observed between monotherapy (31.9%, n = 93%) and dual therapy (16.7% n = 11%) patients during the study period. No difference was noted between groups in rate of ED use for patients using the ED. Cost savings associated with ED avoidance, approximately $782 per patient between monotherapy and dual therapy, were insufficient to balance the increased pharmacy cost, which was calculated as approximately $7,115.88 annually per patient based on average wholesale price.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Dual therapy for migraine had a positive effect on ED visit utilization in our sample while also having cost implications. Health care systems and neurology providers may benefit from this assessment when establishing migraine care, developing data structures, and planning for VBP models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"e200519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370233/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:基于价值的支付(VBP)模型要求组织了解促成上述谈判目标的支出和利用的条件。头痛是2022年急诊室就诊的十大原因之一。2023年,偏头痛患者的诊断率继续保持在2000多例。几乎所有这些就诊结果都是同一天出院,这表明这些是可以避免的。Payvider委员会被用来影响医疗政策的变化,偏头痛治疗的双重疗法(同时使用抗降钙素基因相关肽药物和肉毒杆菌毒素)于2023年5月被批准覆盖。本研究通过比较单药治疗和双药治疗患者组的药费和ED利用成本,深入了解医疗政策变化对成本和ED利用的影响。方法:回顾性分析偏头痛患者使用一种(单一治疗)或两种(双重治疗)药物治疗的ED遭遇。根据处方药物,患者被分为接受单一疗法或双重疗法治疗偏头痛。比较两组患者的急诊科使用率、急诊科使用率和药房费用。该分析被外推到组织内更大的偏头痛人群,以了解改变偏头痛管理对组织的成本效应。结果:357名健康计划成员在2023年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间使用了ED后处理。在研究期间,单药治疗(31.9%,n = 93%)和双药治疗(16.7%,n = 11%)患者的ED使用率有显著差异(p = 0.02)。在使用ED的患者中,两组之间的ED使用率没有差异。避免ED的成本节约,单药治疗和双药治疗之间每位患者约782美元,不足以平衡增加的药房成本,根据平均批发价计算,每位患者每年约7115.88美元。讨论:在我们的样本中,偏头痛的双重治疗对急诊科就诊利用率有积极影响,同时也有成本影响。卫生保健系统和神经学提供者在建立偏头痛护理、开发数据结构和规划VBP模型时可能受益于该评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the Opportunities in Dual Therapy and Emergency Department Utilization in Migraine Care.

Background and objectives: Value-based payment (VBP) models require organizations to understand conditions that are contributing to spending and utilization above negotiated targets. Headache was a top 10 reason for an emergency department (ED) visit in 2022. The high utilization continued with more than 2,000 ED visits for migraine in 2023. Nearly all these visits resulted in same-day discharge home, suggesting these may be avoidable. A Payvider council was used to affect medical policy change, and dual therapy for migraine treatment (concurrent use of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide medications and onabotulinumtoxinA) was approved for coverage in May 2023. This study provides insight into the effect on cost and ED utilization of the medical policy change enabling dual therapy treatment of migraine by comparing cost for pharmacy and ED utilization across monotherapy or dual therapy patient groups.

Methods: Patients with a prescription for 1 (monotherapy) or both (dual therapy) medications of interest with an ED encounter for migraine were reviewed. Based on the medications prescribed, patients were classified as receiving monotherapy or dual therapy for the treatment of migraine. The rates of emergency department utilization, ED utilization costs, and pharmacy costs were compared between the groups. This analysis was extrapolated to the larger migraine population within the organization to understand the cost effect of changing migraine management to the organization.

Results: Three hundred fifty-seven health plan members used the ED posttreatment between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023. A significant difference (p = 0.02) in ED utilization was observed between monotherapy (31.9%, n = 93%) and dual therapy (16.7% n = 11%) patients during the study period. No difference was noted between groups in rate of ED use for patients using the ED. Cost savings associated with ED avoidance, approximately $782 per patient between monotherapy and dual therapy, were insufficient to balance the increased pharmacy cost, which was calculated as approximately $7,115.88 annually per patient based on average wholesale price.

Discussion: Dual therapy for migraine had a positive effect on ED visit utilization in our sample while also having cost implications. Health care systems and neurology providers may benefit from this assessment when establishing migraine care, developing data structures, and planning for VBP models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信