闭锁综合征的护理能力评估和目标探索:临床医生指南。

IF 3.2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-28 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200527
Daniel Karlin, Joanna Smolenski, Daniel Edward Callies, Joseph A Raho
{"title":"闭锁综合征的护理能力评估和目标探索:临床医生指南。","authors":"Daniel Karlin, Joanna Smolenski, Daniel Edward Callies, Joseph A Raho","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with locked-in syndrome (LIS) pose unique ethical challenges for decision making, given the complexities of communication. However, some of these patients may retain the ability to participate in decisions regarding their care, including whether to continue life-sustaining treatment or pursue comfort care only. Following a deidentified case, this article has 2 central aims. First, it examines the ethical foundations of decision making and the complexities of capacity assessments for this patient population. Second, it offers a practical guide for neurologists to use when making such evaluations. This guide facilitates a way of communicating with patients with LIS so that clinicians may more systematically assess the patient's capacity to make their own consequential medical decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 5","pages":"e200527"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Capacity and Exploring Goals of Care in Locked-In Syndrome: A Clinician's Guide.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Karlin, Joanna Smolenski, Daniel Edward Callies, Joseph A Raho\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients with locked-in syndrome (LIS) pose unique ethical challenges for decision making, given the complexities of communication. However, some of these patients may retain the ability to participate in decisions regarding their care, including whether to continue life-sustaining treatment or pursue comfort care only. Following a deidentified case, this article has 2 central aims. First, it examines the ethical foundations of decision making and the complexities of capacity assessments for this patient population. Second, it offers a practical guide for neurologists to use when making such evaluations. This guide facilitates a way of communicating with patients with LIS so that clinicians may more systematically assess the patient's capacity to make their own consequential medical decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"e200527\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396601/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200527\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于沟通的复杂性,闭锁综合征(LIS)患者对决策提出了独特的伦理挑战。然而,其中一些患者可能保留参与有关其护理的决定的能力,包括是否继续维持生命治疗或只追求舒适护理。在一个未确定的案例之后,本文有两个主要目的。首先,它检查决策的伦理基础和能力评估的复杂性,为这一患者群体。其次,它为神经科医生在进行此类评估时提供了实用指南。本指南有助于与LIS患者进行沟通,以便临床医生可以更系统地评估患者做出相应医疗决策的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Capacity and Exploring Goals of Care in Locked-In Syndrome: A Clinician's Guide.

Patients with locked-in syndrome (LIS) pose unique ethical challenges for decision making, given the complexities of communication. However, some of these patients may retain the ability to participate in decisions regarding their care, including whether to continue life-sustaining treatment or pursue comfort care only. Following a deidentified case, this article has 2 central aims. First, it examines the ethical foundations of decision making and the complexities of capacity assessments for this patient population. Second, it offers a practical guide for neurologists to use when making such evaluations. This guide facilitates a way of communicating with patients with LIS so that clinicians may more systematically assess the patient's capacity to make their own consequential medical decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信