{"title":"社论:脂肪肝的基因型、遗传风险和预后的时间到了。","authors":"Rosellina M. Mancina, Stefano Romeo","doi":"10.1111/apt.70269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As the global burden of steatotic liver disease (SLD), including metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), continues to grow, hepatology faces a critical need for better tools to predict disease progression. In the last two decades, human genetic studies on SLD identified several variants associated with this disease [<span>1, 2</span>]. The meta-analysis by Kubina et al. [<span>3</span>] provides timely evidence that common variants in key genetic determinants of SLD, namely, <i>PNPLA3</i>, <i>TM6SF2</i> and <i>MBOAT7</i>, may help address this gap. By using data from 40 independent studies for a total of more than 270,000 people, the authors demonstrate that these variants are not just risk factors for SLD onset but meaningful predictors of major adverse liver outcomes (MALO).</p><p>Among all the genetic variants studied, homozygosity for the <i>PNPLA3</i>-rs738409 minor (G) allele emerges as the most powerful and consistent marker of adverse hepatic outcomes. It increases the risk of MALO by 2.3-fold (95% CI 1.66–3.18) [<span>3</span>], hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by 2.18-fold (95% CI 1.46–3.27) [<span>3</span>], cirrhosis/advanced liver disease by 2.47-fold (95% CI 1.81–3.37) [<span>3</span>] and, critically, liver-related mortality by 2.83-fold (95% CI 1.58–5.06) [<span>3</span>]. These are substantial effect sizes, comparable to, and in some cases greater than, those of traditional clinical risk factors such as diabetes, highlighting that <i>PNPLA3</i> is a key driver of MASLD progression and, ultimately, liver-related mortality. Interestingly, a recent study showed that <i>PNPLA3</i> homozygosis was associated with higher liver fibrosis by age 44, with an increased impact with aging [<span>4, 5</span>].</p><p>Importantly, <i>TM6SF2</i>-rs58542926 also proved clinically meaningful, particularly for HCC. People carrying the CT or TT genotype had more than a twofold increased risk of HCC (sHR 2.12; 95% CI 1.66–2.70) [<span>3</span>]. Mechanistically, TM6SF2 stabilises APOB [<span>6</span>] and when its function is impaired, hepatocellular lipids accumulate due to reduced very low-density lipoprotein secretion [<span>6</span>]. This is consistent with prior studies showing an enrichment of <i>APOB</i> loss-of-function variants in a cohort of people with HCC [<span>7</span>].</p><p>Crucially, the utility of genetic information is highest when known early. By the time someone reaches advanced fibrosis, the effects of deleterious variants like those in <i>PNPLA3</i> and <i>TM6SF2</i> have often already played out across decades of unrecognised liver injury. Genotyping at the first signs of SLD, namely, elevated transaminases, SLD on imaging or initial fibrosis, offers a window of opportunity to change liver disease trajectory. Early identification of high-risk people may allow for targeted diet, lifestyle and pharmacological intervention.</p><p><i>MBOAT7</i> TT allele showed more modest associations with MALO (sHR 1.21; 95% CI 1.10–1.33) [<span>3</span>], cirrhosis/advanced liver disease (sHR 1.49; 95% CI 1.14–1.94) [<span>3</span>] and HCC (sHR 1.43; 95% CI 1.04–1.99) [<span>3</span>]. Interestingly, it was linked to lower all-cause mortality in two small studies comprising a total 1505 participants (sHR 0.78; 95% CI 0.62–0.98) [<span>3</span>], a finding that deserves further scrutiny but may reflect complex metabolic trade-offs.</p><p>Despite the evidence, genotyping remains absent from clinical guidelines. Yet, in many tertiary care centres and specialised liver clinics, genotyping for <i>PNPLA3</i> and <i>TM6SF2</i> is already routinely performed to support risk stratification. This meta-analysis moves the field a step closer to precision hepatology. One cannot help but wonder whether the time to implement genotyping is already upon us, or what further evidence would still be needed to compel us.</p><p><b>Rosellina M. Mancina:</b> conceptualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. <b>Stefano Romeo:</b> conceptualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing.</p><p>S.R. has been consulting for AstraZeneca, GSK, Celgene Corporation, Ribo-cure AB and Pfizer in the last 5 years and received the research grant from AstraZeneca. The funders had no role in this editorial. R.M.M. has none to declare.</p><p>This article is linked to Kubina et al. papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70256 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70361.</p>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"62 8","pages":"841-842"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.70269","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial: Time to Genotype—Genetic Risk and Prognosis in Steatotic Liver Disease\",\"authors\":\"Rosellina M. Mancina, Stefano Romeo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apt.70269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As the global burden of steatotic liver disease (SLD), including metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), continues to grow, hepatology faces a critical need for better tools to predict disease progression. In the last two decades, human genetic studies on SLD identified several variants associated with this disease [<span>1, 2</span>]. The meta-analysis by Kubina et al. [<span>3</span>] provides timely evidence that common variants in key genetic determinants of SLD, namely, <i>PNPLA3</i>, <i>TM6SF2</i> and <i>MBOAT7</i>, may help address this gap. By using data from 40 independent studies for a total of more than 270,000 people, the authors demonstrate that these variants are not just risk factors for SLD onset but meaningful predictors of major adverse liver outcomes (MALO).</p><p>Among all the genetic variants studied, homozygosity for the <i>PNPLA3</i>-rs738409 minor (G) allele emerges as the most powerful and consistent marker of adverse hepatic outcomes. It increases the risk of MALO by 2.3-fold (95% CI 1.66–3.18) [<span>3</span>], hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by 2.18-fold (95% CI 1.46–3.27) [<span>3</span>], cirrhosis/advanced liver disease by 2.47-fold (95% CI 1.81–3.37) [<span>3</span>] and, critically, liver-related mortality by 2.83-fold (95% CI 1.58–5.06) [<span>3</span>]. These are substantial effect sizes, comparable to, and in some cases greater than, those of traditional clinical risk factors such as diabetes, highlighting that <i>PNPLA3</i> is a key driver of MASLD progression and, ultimately, liver-related mortality. Interestingly, a recent study showed that <i>PNPLA3</i> homozygosis was associated with higher liver fibrosis by age 44, with an increased impact with aging [<span>4, 5</span>].</p><p>Importantly, <i>TM6SF2</i>-rs58542926 also proved clinically meaningful, particularly for HCC. People carrying the CT or TT genotype had more than a twofold increased risk of HCC (sHR 2.12; 95% CI 1.66–2.70) [<span>3</span>]. Mechanistically, TM6SF2 stabilises APOB [<span>6</span>] and when its function is impaired, hepatocellular lipids accumulate due to reduced very low-density lipoprotein secretion [<span>6</span>]. This is consistent with prior studies showing an enrichment of <i>APOB</i> loss-of-function variants in a cohort of people with HCC [<span>7</span>].</p><p>Crucially, the utility of genetic information is highest when known early. By the time someone reaches advanced fibrosis, the effects of deleterious variants like those in <i>PNPLA3</i> and <i>TM6SF2</i> have often already played out across decades of unrecognised liver injury. Genotyping at the first signs of SLD, namely, elevated transaminases, SLD on imaging or initial fibrosis, offers a window of opportunity to change liver disease trajectory. Early identification of high-risk people may allow for targeted diet, lifestyle and pharmacological intervention.</p><p><i>MBOAT7</i> TT allele showed more modest associations with MALO (sHR 1.21; 95% CI 1.10–1.33) [<span>3</span>], cirrhosis/advanced liver disease (sHR 1.49; 95% CI 1.14–1.94) [<span>3</span>] and HCC (sHR 1.43; 95% CI 1.04–1.99) [<span>3</span>]. Interestingly, it was linked to lower all-cause mortality in two small studies comprising a total 1505 participants (sHR 0.78; 95% CI 0.62–0.98) [<span>3</span>], a finding that deserves further scrutiny but may reflect complex metabolic trade-offs.</p><p>Despite the evidence, genotyping remains absent from clinical guidelines. Yet, in many tertiary care centres and specialised liver clinics, genotyping for <i>PNPLA3</i> and <i>TM6SF2</i> is already routinely performed to support risk stratification. This meta-analysis moves the field a step closer to precision hepatology. One cannot help but wonder whether the time to implement genotyping is already upon us, or what further evidence would still be needed to compel us.</p><p><b>Rosellina M. Mancina:</b> conceptualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. <b>Stefano Romeo:</b> conceptualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing.</p><p>S.R. has been consulting for AstraZeneca, GSK, Celgene Corporation, Ribo-cure AB and Pfizer in the last 5 years and received the research grant from AstraZeneca. The funders had no role in this editorial. R.M.M. has none to declare.</p><p>This article is linked to Kubina et al. papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70256 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70361.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"62 8\",\"pages\":\"841-842\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.70269\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.70269\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.70269","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
随着脂肪变性肝病(SLD)(包括代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病(MASLD)和酒精相关肝病(ALD))的全球负担持续增长,肝病学急需更好的工具来预测疾病进展。在过去的二十年中,对SLD的人类遗传研究发现了与该疾病相关的几种变异[1,2]。Kubina等人的荟萃分析提供了及时的证据,表明SLD关键遗传决定因素的常见变异,即PNPLA3、TM6SF2和MBOAT7,可能有助于解决这一差距。通过使用40项独立研究的数据,总共超过270,000人,作者证明这些变异不仅是SLD发病的危险因素,而且是主要不良肝脏结局(MALO)的有意义的预测因素。在所有研究的遗传变异中,PNPLA3-rs738409小等位基因(G)的纯合性是肝脏不良结局最有力和最一致的标志。它使MALO的风险增加2.3倍(95% CI 1.66-3.18),肝细胞癌(HCC)的风险增加2.18倍(95% CI 1.46-3.27),肝硬化/晚期肝病的风险增加2.47倍(95% CI 1.81-3.37),肝脏相关死亡率增加2.83倍(95% CI 1.58-5.06)。这些都是实质性的效应量,与传统的临床危险因素(如糖尿病)相当,在某些情况下甚至大于这些效应量,强调PNPLA3是MASLD进展和最终肝脏相关死亡率的关键驱动因素。有趣的是,最近的一项研究表明,PNPLA3纯合子与44岁时较高的肝纤维化有关,并且随着年龄的增长而增加[4,5]。重要的是,TM6SF2-rs58542926也被证明具有临床意义,特别是对HCC。携带CT或TT基因型的人患HCC的风险增加了两倍以上(sHR 2.12; 95% CI 1.66-2.70)。从机制上讲,TM6SF2稳定APOB[6],当其功能受损时,由于极低密度脂蛋白分泌[6]减少,肝细胞脂质积累。这与先前的研究一致,表明在HCC患者队列中APOB功能丧失变异体富集。至关重要的是,遗传信息在早期被发现时的效用是最高的。当一个人达到晚期纤维化时,像PNPLA3和TM6SF2这样的有害变异的影响通常已经在几十年的未被识别的肝损伤中发挥作用。在SLD的最初迹象,即转氨酶升高、影像学上的SLD或初始纤维化时进行基因分型,为改变肝脏疾病轨迹提供了机会。对高危人群的早期识别可能有助于有针对性的饮食、生活方式和药物干预。MBOAT7 TT等位基因与MALO (sHR 1.21, 95% CI 1.10-1.33)[3]、肝硬化/晚期肝病(sHR 1.49, 95% CI 1.14-1.94)[3]和HCC (sHR 1.43, 95% CI 1.04-1.99)[3]的关联更为轻微。有趣的是,在两项包括1505名参与者(sHR 0.78; 95% CI 0.62-0.98)的小型研究中,它与较低的全因死亡率有关,这一发现值得进一步审查,但可能反映了复杂的代谢权衡。尽管有证据,基因分型仍然没有出现在临床指南中。然而,在许多三级保健中心和专业肝脏诊所,PNPLA3和TM6SF2的基因分型已经被常规执行,以支持风险分层。这项荟萃分析使该领域向精确肝病学迈进了一步。人们不禁想知道,实施基因分型的时机是否已经到来,或者还需要什么进一步的证据来迫使我们。罗塞丽娜M.曼西纳:构思,写作-原稿,写作-审查和编辑。Stefano Romeo:概念化,写作-原稿,写作-审查和编辑。在过去的5年里,他一直为阿斯利康、葛兰素史克、新基公司、Ribo-cure AB和辉瑞提供咨询服务,并获得了阿斯利康的研究资助。资助者在这篇社论中没有任何作用。R.M.M.没有要申报的。这篇文章链接到Kubina等人的论文。要查看这些文章,请访问https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70256和https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70361。
Editorial: Time to Genotype—Genetic Risk and Prognosis in Steatotic Liver Disease
As the global burden of steatotic liver disease (SLD), including metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), continues to grow, hepatology faces a critical need for better tools to predict disease progression. In the last two decades, human genetic studies on SLD identified several variants associated with this disease [1, 2]. The meta-analysis by Kubina et al. [3] provides timely evidence that common variants in key genetic determinants of SLD, namely, PNPLA3, TM6SF2 and MBOAT7, may help address this gap. By using data from 40 independent studies for a total of more than 270,000 people, the authors demonstrate that these variants are not just risk factors for SLD onset but meaningful predictors of major adverse liver outcomes (MALO).
Among all the genetic variants studied, homozygosity for the PNPLA3-rs738409 minor (G) allele emerges as the most powerful and consistent marker of adverse hepatic outcomes. It increases the risk of MALO by 2.3-fold (95% CI 1.66–3.18) [3], hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by 2.18-fold (95% CI 1.46–3.27) [3], cirrhosis/advanced liver disease by 2.47-fold (95% CI 1.81–3.37) [3] and, critically, liver-related mortality by 2.83-fold (95% CI 1.58–5.06) [3]. These are substantial effect sizes, comparable to, and in some cases greater than, those of traditional clinical risk factors such as diabetes, highlighting that PNPLA3 is a key driver of MASLD progression and, ultimately, liver-related mortality. Interestingly, a recent study showed that PNPLA3 homozygosis was associated with higher liver fibrosis by age 44, with an increased impact with aging [4, 5].
Importantly, TM6SF2-rs58542926 also proved clinically meaningful, particularly for HCC. People carrying the CT or TT genotype had more than a twofold increased risk of HCC (sHR 2.12; 95% CI 1.66–2.70) [3]. Mechanistically, TM6SF2 stabilises APOB [6] and when its function is impaired, hepatocellular lipids accumulate due to reduced very low-density lipoprotein secretion [6]. This is consistent with prior studies showing an enrichment of APOB loss-of-function variants in a cohort of people with HCC [7].
Crucially, the utility of genetic information is highest when known early. By the time someone reaches advanced fibrosis, the effects of deleterious variants like those in PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 have often already played out across decades of unrecognised liver injury. Genotyping at the first signs of SLD, namely, elevated transaminases, SLD on imaging or initial fibrosis, offers a window of opportunity to change liver disease trajectory. Early identification of high-risk people may allow for targeted diet, lifestyle and pharmacological intervention.
MBOAT7 TT allele showed more modest associations with MALO (sHR 1.21; 95% CI 1.10–1.33) [3], cirrhosis/advanced liver disease (sHR 1.49; 95% CI 1.14–1.94) [3] and HCC (sHR 1.43; 95% CI 1.04–1.99) [3]. Interestingly, it was linked to lower all-cause mortality in two small studies comprising a total 1505 participants (sHR 0.78; 95% CI 0.62–0.98) [3], a finding that deserves further scrutiny but may reflect complex metabolic trade-offs.
Despite the evidence, genotyping remains absent from clinical guidelines. Yet, in many tertiary care centres and specialised liver clinics, genotyping for PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 is already routinely performed to support risk stratification. This meta-analysis moves the field a step closer to precision hepatology. One cannot help but wonder whether the time to implement genotyping is already upon us, or what further evidence would still be needed to compel us.
Rosellina M. Mancina: conceptualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. Stefano Romeo: conceptualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing.
S.R. has been consulting for AstraZeneca, GSK, Celgene Corporation, Ribo-cure AB and Pfizer in the last 5 years and received the research grant from AstraZeneca. The funders had no role in this editorial. R.M.M. has none to declare.
This article is linked to Kubina et al. papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70256 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70361.
期刊介绍:
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.