2017年至2023年阿片类药物处方的趋势和相关因素。

IF 5.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Wenyu Song,Kenneth J Mukamal,Joji Suzuki,Jorge A Rodriguez,Michael Sainlaire,Scott G Weiner,Patricia C Dykes,David W Bates
{"title":"2017年至2023年阿片类药物处方的趋势和相关因素。","authors":"Wenyu Song,Kenneth J Mukamal,Joji Suzuki,Jorge A Rodriguez,Michael Sainlaire,Scott G Weiner,Patricia C Dykes,David W Bates","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Widespread misuse of prescription opioids has resulted in large numbers of opioid-related overdose deaths. It is critical to have a better understanding of the temporal patterns of opioid prescribing practices and associated clinical scenarios. We examined opioid prescription trends over 7 years in a large medical system using electronic health record data. Between 2017 and 2023, we identified 1,019,706 patients from 13 hospitals within a large health system in the northeastern United States, who had at least 1 opioid prescription. In total, there were 3,877,281 associated encounters with 18,225 prescribers. We examined the overall monthly opioid prescription rates and observed an average decrease during the 84 months of study period and discovered 4 distinct stages. A decrease was seen between January 2017 and January 2020 (monthly rate change: -0.70%, 95% CI: -0.89% to -0.41%), followed by a sharp decrease and a fast rebound between February 2020, April 2020, and July 2020 (monthly rate change: -10.60%, 95% CI: -14.73% to -2.52%; 13.06%, 95% CI: 3.42%-18.47%), then back to a gradual decrease from August 2020 to December 2023 (monthly rate change: -0.46%, 95% CI: -0.67% to -0.29%). When prescriptions were further classified by prescribing setting, patient demographics, and patient visit encounter types, we observed variations among these subgroups. We also identified significant associations between patient characteristics and provider specialty with high morphine milligram equivalent dose prescriptions. These results highlight the complexity of opioid prescription practice trends indicating that all these issues need to be considered in developing prescription guidance.","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends and factors associated with opioid prescribing from 2017 to 2023.\",\"authors\":\"Wenyu Song,Kenneth J Mukamal,Joji Suzuki,Jorge A Rodriguez,Michael Sainlaire,Scott G Weiner,Patricia C Dykes,David W Bates\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Widespread misuse of prescription opioids has resulted in large numbers of opioid-related overdose deaths. It is critical to have a better understanding of the temporal patterns of opioid prescribing practices and associated clinical scenarios. We examined opioid prescription trends over 7 years in a large medical system using electronic health record data. Between 2017 and 2023, we identified 1,019,706 patients from 13 hospitals within a large health system in the northeastern United States, who had at least 1 opioid prescription. In total, there were 3,877,281 associated encounters with 18,225 prescribers. We examined the overall monthly opioid prescription rates and observed an average decrease during the 84 months of study period and discovered 4 distinct stages. A decrease was seen between January 2017 and January 2020 (monthly rate change: -0.70%, 95% CI: -0.89% to -0.41%), followed by a sharp decrease and a fast rebound between February 2020, April 2020, and July 2020 (monthly rate change: -10.60%, 95% CI: -14.73% to -2.52%; 13.06%, 95% CI: 3.42%-18.47%), then back to a gradual decrease from August 2020 to December 2023 (monthly rate change: -0.46%, 95% CI: -0.67% to -0.29%). When prescriptions were further classified by prescribing setting, patient demographics, and patient visit encounter types, we observed variations among these subgroups. We also identified significant associations between patient characteristics and provider specialty with high morphine milligram equivalent dose prescriptions. These results highlight the complexity of opioid prescription practice trends indicating that all these issues need to be considered in developing prescription guidance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PAIN®\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PAIN®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003806\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003806","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

处方类阿片的广泛滥用已导致大量与类阿片有关的过量死亡。更好地了解阿片类药物处方实践的时间模式和相关的临床情况是至关重要的。我们使用电子健康记录数据在一个大型医疗系统中检查了7年来阿片类药物的处方趋势。在2017年至2023年期间,我们从美国东北部一个大型卫生系统的13家医院中确定了1,019,706名患者,他们至少有1种阿片类药物处方。总共有3,877,281次与18,225名处方者相关的接触。我们检查了总体每月阿片类药物处方率,并观察到在84个月的研究期间平均下降,并发现了4个不同的阶段。在2017年1月至2020年1月期间出现下降(每月利率变化:-0.70%,95% CI: -0.89%至-0.41%),随后在2020年2月,2020年4月和2020年7月期间急剧下降并快速反弹(每月利率变化:-10.60%,95% CI: -14.73%至-2.52%;13.06%,95% CI: 3.42%至18.47%),然后从2020年8月到2023年12月逐渐下降(每月利率变化:-0.46%,95% CI: -0.67%至-0.29%)。当处方进一步按处方设置、患者人口统计学和患者就诊类型分类时,我们观察到这些亚组之间的差异。我们还确定了患者特征与高吗啡毫克当量剂量处方的提供者专业之间的显著关联。这些结果突出了阿片类药物处方实践趋势的复杂性,表明在制定处方指南时需要考虑所有这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends and factors associated with opioid prescribing from 2017 to 2023.
Widespread misuse of prescription opioids has resulted in large numbers of opioid-related overdose deaths. It is critical to have a better understanding of the temporal patterns of opioid prescribing practices and associated clinical scenarios. We examined opioid prescription trends over 7 years in a large medical system using electronic health record data. Between 2017 and 2023, we identified 1,019,706 patients from 13 hospitals within a large health system in the northeastern United States, who had at least 1 opioid prescription. In total, there were 3,877,281 associated encounters with 18,225 prescribers. We examined the overall monthly opioid prescription rates and observed an average decrease during the 84 months of study period and discovered 4 distinct stages. A decrease was seen between January 2017 and January 2020 (monthly rate change: -0.70%, 95% CI: -0.89% to -0.41%), followed by a sharp decrease and a fast rebound between February 2020, April 2020, and July 2020 (monthly rate change: -10.60%, 95% CI: -14.73% to -2.52%; 13.06%, 95% CI: 3.42%-18.47%), then back to a gradual decrease from August 2020 to December 2023 (monthly rate change: -0.46%, 95% CI: -0.67% to -0.29%). When prescriptions were further classified by prescribing setting, patient demographics, and patient visit encounter types, we observed variations among these subgroups. We also identified significant associations between patient characteristics and provider specialty with high morphine milligram equivalent dose prescriptions. These results highlight the complexity of opioid prescription practice trends indicating that all these issues need to be considered in developing prescription guidance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PAIN®
PAIN® 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: PAIN® is the official publication of the International Association for the Study of Pain and publishes original research on the nature,mechanisms and treatment of pain.PAIN® provides a forum for the dissemination of research in the basic and clinical sciences of multidisciplinary interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信