Brian Nghiem, Zhe Wu, Sriranga Kashyap, Lars Kasper, Kâmil Uludağ
{"title":"一种网络辅助关节图像和运动估计方法,用于鲁棒3D MRI运动校正。","authors":"Brian Nghiem, Zhe Wu, Sriranga Kashyap, Lars Kasper, Kâmil Uludağ","doi":"10.1002/mrm.70052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this work was to develop and evaluate a novel method that leverages neural networks and physical modeling for 3D motion correction at different levels of corruption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The novel method (\"UNet+JE\") combines an existing neural network (\"UNet<sub>mag</sub>\") with a physics-informed algorithm for jointly estimating motion parameters and the motion-compensated image (\"JE\"). UNet<sub>mag</sub> and UNet+JE were trained on two training datasets separately with different distributions of motion corruption severity and compared to JE as a benchmark. All five resulting methods were tested on T<sub>1</sub>w 3D MPRAGE scans of healthy participants with simulated (n = 40) and in vivo (n = 10) motion corruption ranging from mild to severe motion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>UNet+JE provided better motion correction than UNet<sub>mag</sub> ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <msup><mn>10</mn> <mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>2</mn></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ p<{10}^{-2} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> for all metrics for both simulated and in vivo data), under both training datasets. UNet<sub>mag</sub> exhibited residual image artifacts and blurring, as well as greater susceptibility to data distribution shifts than UNet+JE. UNet+JE and JE did not significantly differ in image correction quality ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo>></mo> <mn>0.05</mn></mrow> <annotation>$$ p>0.05 $$</annotation></semantics> </math> for all metrics), even under strong distribution shifts for UNet+JE. However, UNet+JE reduced runtimes by a median reduction factor of between 2.00 to 3.80 as well as 4.05 for the simulation and in vivo studies, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UNet+JE benefitted from the robustness of joint estimation and the fast image improvement provided by the neural network, enabling the method to provide high quality 3D image correction under a wide range of motion corruption within shorter runtimes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A network-assisted joint image and motion estimation approach for robust 3D MRI motion correction across severity levels.\",\"authors\":\"Brian Nghiem, Zhe Wu, Sriranga Kashyap, Lars Kasper, Kâmil Uludağ\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mrm.70052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this work was to develop and evaluate a novel method that leverages neural networks and physical modeling for 3D motion correction at different levels of corruption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The novel method (\\\"UNet+JE\\\") combines an existing neural network (\\\"UNet<sub>mag</sub>\\\") with a physics-informed algorithm for jointly estimating motion parameters and the motion-compensated image (\\\"JE\\\"). UNet<sub>mag</sub> and UNet+JE were trained on two training datasets separately with different distributions of motion corruption severity and compared to JE as a benchmark. All five resulting methods were tested on T<sub>1</sub>w 3D MPRAGE scans of healthy participants with simulated (n = 40) and in vivo (n = 10) motion corruption ranging from mild to severe motion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>UNet+JE provided better motion correction than UNet<sub>mag</sub> ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <msup><mn>10</mn> <mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>2</mn></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ p<{10}^{-2} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> for all metrics for both simulated and in vivo data), under both training datasets. UNet<sub>mag</sub> exhibited residual image artifacts and blurring, as well as greater susceptibility to data distribution shifts than UNet+JE. UNet+JE and JE did not significantly differ in image correction quality ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo>></mo> <mn>0.05</mn></mrow> <annotation>$$ p>0.05 $$</annotation></semantics> </math> for all metrics), even under strong distribution shifts for UNet+JE. However, UNet+JE reduced runtimes by a median reduction factor of between 2.00 to 3.80 as well as 4.05 for the simulation and in vivo studies, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UNet+JE benefitted from the robustness of joint estimation and the fast image improvement provided by the neural network, enabling the method to provide high quality 3D image correction under a wide range of motion corruption within shorter runtimes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70052\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70052","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
A network-assisted joint image and motion estimation approach for robust 3D MRI motion correction across severity levels.
Purpose: The purpose of this work was to develop and evaluate a novel method that leverages neural networks and physical modeling for 3D motion correction at different levels of corruption.
Methods: The novel method ("UNet+JE") combines an existing neural network ("UNetmag") with a physics-informed algorithm for jointly estimating motion parameters and the motion-compensated image ("JE"). UNetmag and UNet+JE were trained on two training datasets separately with different distributions of motion corruption severity and compared to JE as a benchmark. All five resulting methods were tested on T1w 3D MPRAGE scans of healthy participants with simulated (n = 40) and in vivo (n = 10) motion corruption ranging from mild to severe motion.
Results: UNet+JE provided better motion correction than UNetmag ( for all metrics for both simulated and in vivo data), under both training datasets. UNetmag exhibited residual image artifacts and blurring, as well as greater susceptibility to data distribution shifts than UNet+JE. UNet+JE and JE did not significantly differ in image correction quality ( for all metrics), even under strong distribution shifts for UNet+JE. However, UNet+JE reduced runtimes by a median reduction factor of between 2.00 to 3.80 as well as 4.05 for the simulation and in vivo studies, respectively.
Conclusions: UNet+JE benefitted from the robustness of joint estimation and the fast image improvement provided by the neural network, enabling the method to provide high quality 3D image correction under a wide range of motion corruption within shorter runtimes.
期刊介绍:
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.