MRS中加速水残留去除:探索深度学习与基于拟合的方法。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Federico Turco, Johannes Slotboom, Milena Capiglioni
{"title":"MRS中加速水残留去除:探索深度学习与基于拟合的方法。","authors":"Federico Turco, Johannes Slotboom, Milena Capiglioni","doi":"10.1002/mrm.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Removing water residual signals from MRS spectra is crucial for accurate metabolite quantification. However, currently available algorithms are computationally intensive and time-consuming, limiting their clinical applicability. This work aims to propose and validate two novel pipelines for fast water residual removal in MRS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two methods for water residual removal are proposed and evaluated: DeepWatR and WaterFit. DeepWatR uses a U-Net-like architecture with an attention mechanism for skip connections. WaterFit uses Torch auto-differentiation to estimate parameters for a 7-pool Lorentzian model. The accuracy and time-efficiency of these methods were assessed using simulated and in vivo 1H brain datasets and compared with the gold standard, Hankel Lanczos singular value decomposition method (HLSVD)Pro.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the simulated dataset, the average percentage quantification error was <math> <semantics> <mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo> <mrow><mn>8.54</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>17.49</mn></mrow> <mo>)</mo></mrow> </mrow> <annotation>$$ \\left(8.54\\pm 17.49\\right) $$</annotation></semantics> </math> % for DeepWatR and <math> <semantics> <mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo> <mrow><mn>7.86</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>16.69</mn></mrow> <mo>)</mo></mrow> </mrow> <annotation>$$ \\left(7.86\\pm 16.69\\right) $$</annotation></semantics> </math> % for WaterFit, both comparable to <math> <semantics> <mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo> <mrow><mn>7.68</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>15.6</mn></mrow> <mo>)</mo></mrow> </mrow> <annotation>$$ \\left(7.68\\pm 15.6\\right) $$</annotation></semantics> </math> % for HLSVDPro in the main metabolites (Cr, Cho, and NAA). DeepWatR was 51 times faster and WaterFit was 22.7 times faster than HLSVDPro for a dataset of 10 000 voxels when using a low-end graphics processing unit. For 100 voxels, the speed-up is 6.5 and 7.5 times faster for DeepWatR and WaterFit, respectively. WaterFit showed higher metabolite fitting accuracy after water removal compared to DeepWatR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WaterFit showed a superior balance of accuracy and processing speed in removing water residual from MRS data compared to DeepWatR. The proposed WaterFit implementation significantly reduces preprocessing time while maintaining metabolite fitting accuracy comparable to gold standard methods. This advancement addresses the need for efficient processing methods that can facilitate analysis and enhance the clinical utility of MRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accelerated water residual removal in MRS: Exploring deep learning versus fitting-based approaches.\",\"authors\":\"Federico Turco, Johannes Slotboom, Milena Capiglioni\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mrm.70031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Removing water residual signals from MRS spectra is crucial for accurate metabolite quantification. However, currently available algorithms are computationally intensive and time-consuming, limiting their clinical applicability. This work aims to propose and validate two novel pipelines for fast water residual removal in MRS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two methods for water residual removal are proposed and evaluated: DeepWatR and WaterFit. DeepWatR uses a U-Net-like architecture with an attention mechanism for skip connections. WaterFit uses Torch auto-differentiation to estimate parameters for a 7-pool Lorentzian model. The accuracy and time-efficiency of these methods were assessed using simulated and in vivo 1H brain datasets and compared with the gold standard, Hankel Lanczos singular value decomposition method (HLSVD)Pro.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the simulated dataset, the average percentage quantification error was <math> <semantics> <mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo> <mrow><mn>8.54</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>17.49</mn></mrow> <mo>)</mo></mrow> </mrow> <annotation>$$ \\\\left(8.54\\\\pm 17.49\\\\right) $$</annotation></semantics> </math> % for DeepWatR and <math> <semantics> <mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo> <mrow><mn>7.86</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>16.69</mn></mrow> <mo>)</mo></mrow> </mrow> <annotation>$$ \\\\left(7.86\\\\pm 16.69\\\\right) $$</annotation></semantics> </math> % for WaterFit, both comparable to <math> <semantics> <mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo> <mrow><mn>7.68</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>15.6</mn></mrow> <mo>)</mo></mrow> </mrow> <annotation>$$ \\\\left(7.68\\\\pm 15.6\\\\right) $$</annotation></semantics> </math> % for HLSVDPro in the main metabolites (Cr, Cho, and NAA). DeepWatR was 51 times faster and WaterFit was 22.7 times faster than HLSVDPro for a dataset of 10 000 voxels when using a low-end graphics processing unit. For 100 voxels, the speed-up is 6.5 and 7.5 times faster for DeepWatR and WaterFit, respectively. WaterFit showed higher metabolite fitting accuracy after water removal compared to DeepWatR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WaterFit showed a superior balance of accuracy and processing speed in removing water residual from MRS data compared to DeepWatR. The proposed WaterFit implementation significantly reduces preprocessing time while maintaining metabolite fitting accuracy comparable to gold standard methods. This advancement addresses the need for efficient processing methods that can facilitate analysis and enhance the clinical utility of MRS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70031\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:从MRS光谱中去除水残留信号是准确定量代谢物的关键。然而,目前可用的算法计算量大,耗时长,限制了它们的临床适用性。本工作旨在提出并验证两种新型管道在mrs中快速去除水残留。方法:提出并评估了两种去除水残留的方法:DeepWatR和WaterFit。DeepWatR使用类似u - net的架构,并带有跳转连接的注意机制。WaterFit使用Torch自动分化来估计7池洛伦兹模型的参数。使用模拟和体内1H脑数据集评估这些方法的准确性和时间效率,并与金标准Hankel Lanczos奇异值分解方法(HLSVD)Pro进行比较。结果:在模拟数据集中,平均百分比量化误差为(8.54±17.49) $$ \left(8.54\pm 17.49\right) $$ % for DeepWatR and ( 7.86 ± 16.69 ) $$ \left(7.86\pm 16.69\right) $$ % for WaterFit, both comparable to ( 7.68 ± 15.6 ) $$ \left(7.68\pm 15.6\right) $$ % for HLSVDPro in the main metabolites (Cr, Cho, and NAA). DeepWatR was 51 times faster and WaterFit was 22.7 times faster than HLSVDPro for a dataset of 10 000 voxels when using a low-end graphics processing unit. For 100 voxels, the speed-up is 6.5 and 7.5 times faster for DeepWatR and WaterFit, respectively. WaterFit showed higher metabolite fitting accuracy after water removal compared to DeepWatR.Conclusion: WaterFit showed a superior balance of accuracy and processing speed in removing water residual from MRS data compared to DeepWatR. The proposed WaterFit implementation significantly reduces preprocessing time while maintaining metabolite fitting accuracy comparable to gold standard methods. This advancement addresses the need for efficient processing methods that can facilitate analysis and enhance the clinical utility of MRS.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accelerated water residual removal in MRS: Exploring deep learning versus fitting-based approaches.

Purpose: Removing water residual signals from MRS spectra is crucial for accurate metabolite quantification. However, currently available algorithms are computationally intensive and time-consuming, limiting their clinical applicability. This work aims to propose and validate two novel pipelines for fast water residual removal in MRS.

Methods: Two methods for water residual removal are proposed and evaluated: DeepWatR and WaterFit. DeepWatR uses a U-Net-like architecture with an attention mechanism for skip connections. WaterFit uses Torch auto-differentiation to estimate parameters for a 7-pool Lorentzian model. The accuracy and time-efficiency of these methods were assessed using simulated and in vivo 1H brain datasets and compared with the gold standard, Hankel Lanczos singular value decomposition method (HLSVD)Pro.

Results: In the simulated dataset, the average percentage quantification error was ( 8.54 ± 17.49 ) $$ \left(8.54\pm 17.49\right) $$ % for DeepWatR and ( 7.86 ± 16.69 ) $$ \left(7.86\pm 16.69\right) $$ % for WaterFit, both comparable to ( 7.68 ± 15.6 ) $$ \left(7.68\pm 15.6\right) $$ % for HLSVDPro in the main metabolites (Cr, Cho, and NAA). DeepWatR was 51 times faster and WaterFit was 22.7 times faster than HLSVDPro for a dataset of 10 000 voxels when using a low-end graphics processing unit. For 100 voxels, the speed-up is 6.5 and 7.5 times faster for DeepWatR and WaterFit, respectively. WaterFit showed higher metabolite fitting accuracy after water removal compared to DeepWatR.

Conclusion: WaterFit showed a superior balance of accuracy and processing speed in removing water residual from MRS data compared to DeepWatR. The proposed WaterFit implementation significantly reduces preprocessing time while maintaining metabolite fitting accuracy comparable to gold standard methods. This advancement addresses the need for efficient processing methods that can facilitate analysis and enhance the clinical utility of MRS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
24.20%
发文量
376
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信