在单孔全腹腔镜子宫切除术中,直肌鞘阻滞比腰方肌阻滞提供更好的镇痛效果:一项前瞻性随机试验。

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Dongju Kim, Seunguk Bang, Jihyun Chung, Hyun-Jung Shin, Eunwon Lee
{"title":"在单孔全腹腔镜子宫切除术中,直肌鞘阻滞比腰方肌阻滞提供更好的镇痛效果:一项前瞻性随机试验。","authors":"Dongju Kim, Seunguk Bang, Jihyun Chung, Hyun-Jung Shin, Eunwon Lee","doi":"10.4097/kja.25174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the growing adoption of minimally invasive surgery, single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) is gaining popularity. However, unlike multi-port TLH, evidence on optimal pain management strategies for single-port TLH remains limited. Given the key role of regional anesthesia in multimodal analgesia, identifying the more effective block technique is clinically relevant. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of the quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and rectus sheath block (RSB) in patients undergoing single-port TLH. We hypothesized that QLB would result in lower 24-hour cumulative opioid consumption than RSB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized trial, 62 patients undergoing single-port TLH were assigned to receive either RSB or QLB. The primary outcome was 24-hour cumulative opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included time to first patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) bolus, pain scores, and the need for rescue analgesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 52 patients were analyzed (RSB: 27; QLB: 25). Median 24-hour opioid consumption was significantly lower in the RSB group (277.9 versus 459.1 μg; P = 0.007). Although the median time to first PCA bolus was similar between groups, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a marginal but statistically significant difference favoring RSB (P = 0.047). Notably, no patients in the RSB group required rescue analgesia, compared to 20% in the QLB group (P = 0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RSB provided superior postoperative analgesia compared to QLB in single-port TLH, reducing both opioid consumption and the need for rescue analgesia. These findings support RSB as the preferred block within a multimodal analgesia strategy for this procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rectus sheath block provides superior analgesia over quadratus lumborum block in single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Dongju Kim, Seunguk Bang, Jihyun Chung, Hyun-Jung Shin, Eunwon Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.4097/kja.25174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the growing adoption of minimally invasive surgery, single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) is gaining popularity. However, unlike multi-port TLH, evidence on optimal pain management strategies for single-port TLH remains limited. Given the key role of regional anesthesia in multimodal analgesia, identifying the more effective block technique is clinically relevant. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of the quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and rectus sheath block (RSB) in patients undergoing single-port TLH. We hypothesized that QLB would result in lower 24-hour cumulative opioid consumption than RSB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized trial, 62 patients undergoing single-port TLH were assigned to receive either RSB or QLB. The primary outcome was 24-hour cumulative opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included time to first patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) bolus, pain scores, and the need for rescue analgesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 52 patients were analyzed (RSB: 27; QLB: 25). Median 24-hour opioid consumption was significantly lower in the RSB group (277.9 versus 459.1 μg; P = 0.007). Although the median time to first PCA bolus was similar between groups, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a marginal but statistically significant difference favoring RSB (P = 0.047). Notably, no patients in the RSB group required rescue analgesia, compared to 20% in the QLB group (P = 0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RSB provided superior postoperative analgesia compared to QLB in single-port TLH, reducing both opioid consumption and the need for rescue analgesia. These findings support RSB as the preferred block within a multimodal analgesia strategy for this procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.25174\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.25174","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着微创手术的日益普及,单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术(TLH)越来越受欢迎。然而,与多端口TLH不同,单端口TLH的最佳疼痛管理策略的证据仍然有限。鉴于区域麻醉在多模态镇痛中的关键作用,确定更有效的阻滞技术具有临床意义。本研究旨在比较腰方肌阻滞(QLB)和直肌鞘阻滞(RSB)在单孔TLH患者中的镇痛效果。我们假设QLB会导致比RSB更低的24小时累积阿片类药物消耗。方法:在这项前瞻性随机试验中,62例接受单孔TLH的患者被分配接受RSB或QLB。主要终点是24小时累计阿片类药物消耗。次要结局包括第一次患者自控镇痛(PCA)丸的时间、疼痛评分和抢救镇痛的需要。结果:分析了52例患者的数据(RSB: 27; QLB: 25)。RSB组24小时阿片类药物消费中位数显著降低(277.9比459.1 μg; P = 0.007)。虽然两组之间到第一次PCA注射的中位时间相似,但Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示RSB有边际但有统计学意义的差异(P = 0.047)。值得注意的是,与QLB组20%的患者相比,RSB组没有患者需要急救镇痛(P = 0.020)。结论:与QLB相比,RSB在单端口TLH中提供了更好的术后镇痛,减少了阿片类药物的消耗和对抢救镇痛的需求。这些发现支持RSB作为该手术多模式镇痛策略中的首选阻滞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rectus sheath block provides superior analgesia over quadratus lumborum block in single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized trial.

Background: With the growing adoption of minimally invasive surgery, single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) is gaining popularity. However, unlike multi-port TLH, evidence on optimal pain management strategies for single-port TLH remains limited. Given the key role of regional anesthesia in multimodal analgesia, identifying the more effective block technique is clinically relevant. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of the quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and rectus sheath block (RSB) in patients undergoing single-port TLH. We hypothesized that QLB would result in lower 24-hour cumulative opioid consumption than RSB.

Methods: In this prospective, randomized trial, 62 patients undergoing single-port TLH were assigned to receive either RSB or QLB. The primary outcome was 24-hour cumulative opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included time to first patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) bolus, pain scores, and the need for rescue analgesia.

Results: Data from 52 patients were analyzed (RSB: 27; QLB: 25). Median 24-hour opioid consumption was significantly lower in the RSB group (277.9 versus 459.1 μg; P = 0.007). Although the median time to first PCA bolus was similar between groups, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a marginal but statistically significant difference favoring RSB (P = 0.047). Notably, no patients in the RSB group required rescue analgesia, compared to 20% in the QLB group (P = 0.020).

Conclusions: RSB provided superior postoperative analgesia compared to QLB in single-port TLH, reducing both opioid consumption and the need for rescue analgesia. These findings support RSB as the preferred block within a multimodal analgesia strategy for this procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信