氢氧化钠与苯酚化学基质切除术。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Clark K Brackney, Jennifer A Kipp, Gregory Russell, Cody D Blazek, Nicholas S Powers, Ashleigh W Medda
{"title":"氢氧化钠与苯酚化学基质切除术。","authors":"Clark K Brackney, Jennifer A Kipp, Gregory Russell, Cody D Blazek, Nicholas S Powers, Ashleigh W Medda","doi":"10.7547/23-081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chemical matrixectomy (CM) is a common procedure to correct painful and ingrown toenails. At our institution, CMs are often performed with either sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or phenol as the chemical agent for germinal nail matrix destruction. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the recurrence and reoperation rates for this procedure using different chemical agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of 192 patients during a 2-year period were reviewed. All of the CMs were performed in a standard fashion by three podiatric physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among phenol partial nail avulsions, 46 nail border removals were performed. Among NaOH partial nail avulsions, 258 nail borders were treated. Mean follow-up was 93 days (median, 17 days). Among partial nail avulsions, the mean reoperation rate per border for CM with phenol was 6.5%. In comparison, the reoperation rate for CM with NaOH was 7.8% (P = .89), indicating that there is no statistically significant difference in reoperation rates between these two chemicals. The mean recurrence of painful nail edge rate per border for CM with phenol was 10.9%. In contrast, with NaOH this rate was 8.1% (P = .58), indicating that there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of development of recurrent painful nail borders between the two procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This retrospective medical record review demonstrated little difference between these chemicals in their reoperation and recurrence rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":17241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","volume":"115 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sodium Hydroxide versus Phenol Chemical Matrixectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Clark K Brackney, Jennifer A Kipp, Gregory Russell, Cody D Blazek, Nicholas S Powers, Ashleigh W Medda\",\"doi\":\"10.7547/23-081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chemical matrixectomy (CM) is a common procedure to correct painful and ingrown toenails. At our institution, CMs are often performed with either sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or phenol as the chemical agent for germinal nail matrix destruction. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the recurrence and reoperation rates for this procedure using different chemical agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of 192 patients during a 2-year period were reviewed. All of the CMs were performed in a standard fashion by three podiatric physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among phenol partial nail avulsions, 46 nail border removals were performed. Among NaOH partial nail avulsions, 258 nail borders were treated. Mean follow-up was 93 days (median, 17 days). Among partial nail avulsions, the mean reoperation rate per border for CM with phenol was 6.5%. In comparison, the reoperation rate for CM with NaOH was 7.8% (P = .89), indicating that there is no statistically significant difference in reoperation rates between these two chemicals. The mean recurrence of painful nail edge rate per border for CM with phenol was 10.9%. In contrast, with NaOH this rate was 8.1% (P = .58), indicating that there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of development of recurrent painful nail borders between the two procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This retrospective medical record review demonstrated little difference between these chemicals in their reoperation and recurrence rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"115 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7547/23-081\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7547/23-081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:化学基质切除术(CM)是一种常见的方法来纠正疼痛和向内生长的脚趾甲。在我们的机构,CMs通常使用氢氧化钠(NaOH)或苯酚作为化学剂来破坏生发指甲基质。本研究的主要目的是评估使用不同化学药剂后的复发率和再手术率。方法:回顾性分析192例患者近2年的病历资料。所有CMs均由三名足科医生以标准方式进行。结果:在苯酚部分甲撕脱术中,46例甲缘切除。在氢氧化钠部分甲撕脱中,治疗了258例甲缘。平均随访93天(中位17天)。在部分甲撕脱中,含酚CM的平均再手术率为6.5%。而NaOH治疗CM的再手术率为7.8% (P = 0.89),两种药物治疗CM的再手术率无统计学差异。含酚CM患者甲缘疼痛复发率平均为10.9%。相比之下,氢氧化钠的发生率为8.1% (P = 0.58),这表明两种方法在复发性指甲边缘疼痛的发生率上没有统计学差异。结论:本回顾性医疗记录回顾显示,这些化学药物在再手术和复发率方面差异不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sodium Hydroxide versus Phenol Chemical Matrixectomy.

Background: Chemical matrixectomy (CM) is a common procedure to correct painful and ingrown toenails. At our institution, CMs are often performed with either sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or phenol as the chemical agent for germinal nail matrix destruction. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the recurrence and reoperation rates for this procedure using different chemical agents.

Methods: The medical records of 192 patients during a 2-year period were reviewed. All of the CMs were performed in a standard fashion by three podiatric physicians.

Results: Among phenol partial nail avulsions, 46 nail border removals were performed. Among NaOH partial nail avulsions, 258 nail borders were treated. Mean follow-up was 93 days (median, 17 days). Among partial nail avulsions, the mean reoperation rate per border for CM with phenol was 6.5%. In comparison, the reoperation rate for CM with NaOH was 7.8% (P = .89), indicating that there is no statistically significant difference in reoperation rates between these two chemicals. The mean recurrence of painful nail edge rate per border for CM with phenol was 10.9%. In contrast, with NaOH this rate was 8.1% (P = .58), indicating that there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of development of recurrent painful nail borders between the two procedures.

Conclusions: This retrospective medical record review demonstrated little difference between these chemicals in their reoperation and recurrence rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, the official journal of the Association, is the oldest and most frequently cited peer-reviewed journal in the profession of foot and ankle medicine. Founded in 1907 and appearing 6 times per year, it publishes research studies, case reports, literature reviews, special communications, clinical correspondence, letters to the editor, book reviews, and various other types of submissions. The Journal is included in major indexing and abstracting services for biomedical literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信