Paul M Haller, Giorgio E M Melloni, David D Berg, Frederick K Kamanu, Yi-Pin Lai, Elliott M Antman, Deepak L Bhatt, Marc P Bonaca, Christopher P Cannon, Robert P Giugliano, Michelle L O'Donoghue, Benjamin M Scirica, Stephen D Wiviott, Daniel Chasman, Brendan M Everett, Eugene Braunwald, David A Morrow, Paul M Ridker, Patrick T Ellinor, Marc S Sabatine, Christian T Ruff, Nicholas A Marston
{"title":"多基因风险评分预测心血管风险范围内的心力衰竭事件。","authors":"Paul M Haller, Giorgio E M Melloni, David D Berg, Frederick K Kamanu, Yi-Pin Lai, Elliott M Antman, Deepak L Bhatt, Marc P Bonaca, Christopher P Cannon, Robert P Giugliano, Michelle L O'Donoghue, Benjamin M Scirica, Stephen D Wiviott, Daniel Chasman, Brendan M Everett, Eugene Braunwald, David A Morrow, Paul M Ridker, Patrick T Ellinor, Marc S Sabatine, Christian T Ruff, Nicholas A Marston","doi":"10.1016/j.jacc.2025.06.050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical utility of a heart failure (HF) polygenic risk score (PRS) is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of an HF PRS to predict new-onset HF in individuals across the spectrum of cardiovascular risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An HF PRS (>1 million single nucleotide variations) was used to stratify individuals from 7 clinical studies to low (quintile [Q] 1), intermediate (Q2-Q4), or high (Q5) genetic risk. In 6 trials of patients at elevated cardiovascular risk, HRs adjusted for clinical factors were derived for the risk of hospitalization for HF using Cox-PH models, and discrimination and calibration was explored. Analyses were conducted in a separate data set of individuals at low cardiovascular risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 74,897 patients without HF, of which 51,627 were at elevated cardiovascular risk (median age 65 years; 71% men; median follow-up 2.5 years). After adjusting for clinical factors, individuals with intermediate and high HF PRS carried a 2- and 5-fold increased rate of new-onset HF, respectively (intermediate risk: HR<sub>adj</sub>: 2.01 [95% CI: 1.62-2.49]; P < 0.001; high-risk: HRadj: 5.00 [95% CI: 3.99-6.27]; P < 0.001). Addition of the HF PRS to a clinical model improved the AUC (0.787 [95% CI: 0.775-0.798] to 0.822 [95% CI: 0.811-0.832]). Results were consistent in 23,270 individuals at low cardiovascular risk over 20-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An HF PRS is a strong and independent predictor for new-onset HF in individuals across the spectrum of cardiovascular risk. The polygenic contribution to HF is complementary to established clinical risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":17187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"860-873"},"PeriodicalIF":22.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Polygenic Risk Score to Predict Incident Heart Failure Across the Spectrum of Cardiovascular Risk.\",\"authors\":\"Paul M Haller, Giorgio E M Melloni, David D Berg, Frederick K Kamanu, Yi-Pin Lai, Elliott M Antman, Deepak L Bhatt, Marc P Bonaca, Christopher P Cannon, Robert P Giugliano, Michelle L O'Donoghue, Benjamin M Scirica, Stephen D Wiviott, Daniel Chasman, Brendan M Everett, Eugene Braunwald, David A Morrow, Paul M Ridker, Patrick T Ellinor, Marc S Sabatine, Christian T Ruff, Nicholas A Marston\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacc.2025.06.050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical utility of a heart failure (HF) polygenic risk score (PRS) is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of an HF PRS to predict new-onset HF in individuals across the spectrum of cardiovascular risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An HF PRS (>1 million single nucleotide variations) was used to stratify individuals from 7 clinical studies to low (quintile [Q] 1), intermediate (Q2-Q4), or high (Q5) genetic risk. In 6 trials of patients at elevated cardiovascular risk, HRs adjusted for clinical factors were derived for the risk of hospitalization for HF using Cox-PH models, and discrimination and calibration was explored. Analyses were conducted in a separate data set of individuals at low cardiovascular risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 74,897 patients without HF, of which 51,627 were at elevated cardiovascular risk (median age 65 years; 71% men; median follow-up 2.5 years). After adjusting for clinical factors, individuals with intermediate and high HF PRS carried a 2- and 5-fold increased rate of new-onset HF, respectively (intermediate risk: HR<sub>adj</sub>: 2.01 [95% CI: 1.62-2.49]; P < 0.001; high-risk: HRadj: 5.00 [95% CI: 3.99-6.27]; P < 0.001). Addition of the HF PRS to a clinical model improved the AUC (0.787 [95% CI: 0.775-0.798] to 0.822 [95% CI: 0.811-0.832]). Results were consistent in 23,270 individuals at low cardiovascular risk over 20-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An HF PRS is a strong and independent predictor for new-onset HF in individuals across the spectrum of cardiovascular risk. The polygenic contribution to HF is complementary to established clinical risk assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"860-873\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":22.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.06.050\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.06.050","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Polygenic Risk Score to Predict Incident Heart Failure Across the Spectrum of Cardiovascular Risk.
Background: The clinical utility of a heart failure (HF) polygenic risk score (PRS) is uncertain.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of an HF PRS to predict new-onset HF in individuals across the spectrum of cardiovascular risk.
Methods: An HF PRS (>1 million single nucleotide variations) was used to stratify individuals from 7 clinical studies to low (quintile [Q] 1), intermediate (Q2-Q4), or high (Q5) genetic risk. In 6 trials of patients at elevated cardiovascular risk, HRs adjusted for clinical factors were derived for the risk of hospitalization for HF using Cox-PH models, and discrimination and calibration was explored. Analyses were conducted in a separate data set of individuals at low cardiovascular risk.
Results: We studied 74,897 patients without HF, of which 51,627 were at elevated cardiovascular risk (median age 65 years; 71% men; median follow-up 2.5 years). After adjusting for clinical factors, individuals with intermediate and high HF PRS carried a 2- and 5-fold increased rate of new-onset HF, respectively (intermediate risk: HRadj: 2.01 [95% CI: 1.62-2.49]; P < 0.001; high-risk: HRadj: 5.00 [95% CI: 3.99-6.27]; P < 0.001). Addition of the HF PRS to a clinical model improved the AUC (0.787 [95% CI: 0.775-0.798] to 0.822 [95% CI: 0.811-0.832]). Results were consistent in 23,270 individuals at low cardiovascular risk over 20-year follow-up.
Conclusions: An HF PRS is a strong and independent predictor for new-onset HF in individuals across the spectrum of cardiovascular risk. The polygenic contribution to HF is complementary to established clinical risk assessment.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) publishes peer-reviewed articles highlighting all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance, state-of-the-art papers and viewpoints.
Content Profile:
-Original Investigations
-JACC State-of-the-Art Reviews
-JACC Review Topics of the Week
-Guidelines & Clinical Documents
-JACC Guideline Comparisons
-JACC Scientific Expert Panels
-Cardiovascular Medicine & Society
-Editorial Comments (accompanying every Original Investigation)
-Research Letters
-Fellows-in-Training/Early Career Professional Pages
-Editor’s Pages from the Editor-in-Chief or other invited thought leaders