左主干PCI术后计算机断层血管造影还是标准护理?

IF 22.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Fabrizio D'Ascenzo, Enrico Cerrato, Ovidio De Filippo, Luca Gaido, Alfonso Franzè, Mario Iannaccone, Wojciech Wańha, Andrea Santarelli, Vincenzo Guiducci, Umberto Barbero, Carlos Fernandez Pereira, Marco Gatti, Matteo Tebaldi, Massimo Giammaria, Giacomo Boccuzzi, Wojciech Wojakowski, Gianluca di Pietro, Roberto Placido, Sebastiano Gili, Alessandro Depaoli, Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai, Francesco Tomassini, Francesco Bruno, Daniela Zugna, Riccardo Faletti, Simone Biscaglia, Serena Caglioni, Ferdinando Varbella, Gaetano Maria de Ferrari, Gianluca Campo
{"title":"左主干PCI术后计算机断层血管造影还是标准护理?","authors":"Fabrizio D'Ascenzo, Enrico Cerrato, Ovidio De Filippo, Luca Gaido, Alfonso Franzè, Mario Iannaccone, Wojciech Wańha, Andrea Santarelli, Vincenzo Guiducci, Umberto Barbero, Carlos Fernandez Pereira, Marco Gatti, Matteo Tebaldi, Massimo Giammaria, Giacomo Boccuzzi, Wojciech Wojakowski, Gianluca di Pietro, Roberto Placido, Sebastiano Gili, Alessandro Depaoli, Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai, Francesco Tomassini, Francesco Bruno, Daniela Zugna, Riccardo Faletti, Simone Biscaglia, Serena Caglioni, Ferdinando Varbella, Gaetano Maria de Ferrari, Gianluca Campo","doi":"10.1016/j.jacc.2025.07.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical benefit of routine coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main (LM) disease is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The authors evaluated whether CCTA-guided follow-up improves clinical outcomes vs symptoms- or ischemia-driven care after LM PCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PULSE was a prospective, multicenter, open-label randomized trial. A total of 606 patients treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents were enrolled (October 2019 to September 2024) and randomized 1:1 to CCTA at 6 months (experimental) or standard care (control). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina, or definite or probable stent thrombosis at 18 months. Secondary endpoints included target-lesion revascularization (TLR) and each primary endpoint component.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CCTA was completed in 272/303 experimental patients (89.8%) after a median of 200 days (IQR: 181-270 days). The primary endpoint occurred in 36/303 experimental patients vs 38/303 control patients (11.9% vs 12.5%; HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.76-1.23; P = 0.80). Compared with the control arm, the CCTA arm showed a reduced risk of spontaneous MI (0.9% vs 4.9%; HR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.07-0.91; P = 0.004) and an increased risk of imaging-triggered TLR (4.9% vs 0.3%; HR: 7.7; 95% CI: 1.70-33.7; P = 0.001), whereas clinically driven TLR rates were similar (5.3% vs 7.2%; HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.38-1.41; P = 0.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Routine CCTA after LM PCI did not reduce the composite primary endpoint, but was associated with fewer spontaneous MIs and more imaging-triggered revascularizations. Future trials to clarify its value in complex anatomic subsets appear to be warranted. (Angiographic Control vs Ischemia-Driven Management of Patients Treated With PCI on Left Main With Drug-Eluting Stents [PULSE; NCT04144881]).</p>","PeriodicalId":17187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computed Tomography Angiography or Standard Care After Left Main PCI?\",\"authors\":\"Fabrizio D'Ascenzo, Enrico Cerrato, Ovidio De Filippo, Luca Gaido, Alfonso Franzè, Mario Iannaccone, Wojciech Wańha, Andrea Santarelli, Vincenzo Guiducci, Umberto Barbero, Carlos Fernandez Pereira, Marco Gatti, Matteo Tebaldi, Massimo Giammaria, Giacomo Boccuzzi, Wojciech Wojakowski, Gianluca di Pietro, Roberto Placido, Sebastiano Gili, Alessandro Depaoli, Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai, Francesco Tomassini, Francesco Bruno, Daniela Zugna, Riccardo Faletti, Simone Biscaglia, Serena Caglioni, Ferdinando Varbella, Gaetano Maria de Ferrari, Gianluca Campo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacc.2025.07.060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical benefit of routine coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main (LM) disease is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The authors evaluated whether CCTA-guided follow-up improves clinical outcomes vs symptoms- or ischemia-driven care after LM PCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PULSE was a prospective, multicenter, open-label randomized trial. A total of 606 patients treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents were enrolled (October 2019 to September 2024) and randomized 1:1 to CCTA at 6 months (experimental) or standard care (control). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina, or definite or probable stent thrombosis at 18 months. Secondary endpoints included target-lesion revascularization (TLR) and each primary endpoint component.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CCTA was completed in 272/303 experimental patients (89.8%) after a median of 200 days (IQR: 181-270 days). The primary endpoint occurred in 36/303 experimental patients vs 38/303 control patients (11.9% vs 12.5%; HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.76-1.23; P = 0.80). Compared with the control arm, the CCTA arm showed a reduced risk of spontaneous MI (0.9% vs 4.9%; HR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.07-0.91; P = 0.004) and an increased risk of imaging-triggered TLR (4.9% vs 0.3%; HR: 7.7; 95% CI: 1.70-33.7; P = 0.001), whereas clinically driven TLR rates were similar (5.3% vs 7.2%; HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.38-1.41; P = 0.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Routine CCTA after LM PCI did not reduce the composite primary endpoint, but was associated with fewer spontaneous MIs and more imaging-triggered revascularizations. Future trials to clarify its value in complex anatomic subsets appear to be warranted. (Angiographic Control vs Ischemia-Driven Management of Patients Treated With PCI on Left Main With Drug-Eluting Stents [PULSE; NCT04144881]).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":22.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.07.060\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.07.060","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后常规冠状动脉ct血管造影(CCTA)治疗无保护左主干(LM)疾病的临床益处尚不确定。目的:作者评估ccta引导的随访是否改善了LM PCI术后的临床结果,而不是症状或缺血驱动的护理。方法:PULSE是一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签的随机试验。共纳入606例接受第二代药物洗脱支架治疗的患者(2019年10月至2024年9月),并在6个月(实验)或标准治疗(对照组)时按1:1随机分配至CCTA。研究的主要终点是18个月时全因死亡、自发性心肌梗死(MI)、不稳定型心绞痛或明确或可能的支架血栓形成。次要终点包括靶病变血运重建术(TLR)和各主要终点组成部分。结果:303例实验患者中有272例(89.8%)在200天(IQR: 181 ~ 270天)后完成CCTA。主要终点发生在36/303的实验患者和38/303的对照患者(11.9% vs 12.5%; HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.76-1.23; P = 0.80)。与对照组相比,CCTA组自发性心肌梗死的风险降低(0.9% vs 4.9%; HR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.07-0.91; P = 0.004),成像引发TLR的风险增加(4.9% vs 0.3%; HR: 7.7; 95% CI: 1.70-33.7; P = 0.001),而临床驱动的TLR率相似(5.3% vs 7.2%; HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.38-1.41; P = 0.32)。结论:LM PCI术后常规CCTA并没有降低复合主要终点,但与自发性心肌梗死减少和影像学触发的血运重建增加有关。未来的试验,以澄清其在复杂的解剖亚群的价值似乎是必要的。血管造影控制与缺血驱动的左主干PCI患者药物洗脱支架治疗[PULSE]; NCT04144881]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computed Tomography Angiography or Standard Care After Left Main PCI?

Background: The clinical benefit of routine coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main (LM) disease is uncertain.

Objectives: The authors evaluated whether CCTA-guided follow-up improves clinical outcomes vs symptoms- or ischemia-driven care after LM PCI.

Methods: PULSE was a prospective, multicenter, open-label randomized trial. A total of 606 patients treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents were enrolled (October 2019 to September 2024) and randomized 1:1 to CCTA at 6 months (experimental) or standard care (control). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina, or definite or probable stent thrombosis at 18 months. Secondary endpoints included target-lesion revascularization (TLR) and each primary endpoint component.

Results: CCTA was completed in 272/303 experimental patients (89.8%) after a median of 200 days (IQR: 181-270 days). The primary endpoint occurred in 36/303 experimental patients vs 38/303 control patients (11.9% vs 12.5%; HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.76-1.23; P = 0.80). Compared with the control arm, the CCTA arm showed a reduced risk of spontaneous MI (0.9% vs 4.9%; HR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.07-0.91; P = 0.004) and an increased risk of imaging-triggered TLR (4.9% vs 0.3%; HR: 7.7; 95% CI: 1.70-33.7; P = 0.001), whereas clinically driven TLR rates were similar (5.3% vs 7.2%; HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.38-1.41; P = 0.32).

Conclusions: Routine CCTA after LM PCI did not reduce the composite primary endpoint, but was associated with fewer spontaneous MIs and more imaging-triggered revascularizations. Future trials to clarify its value in complex anatomic subsets appear to be warranted. (Angiographic Control vs Ischemia-Driven Management of Patients Treated With PCI on Left Main With Drug-Eluting Stents [PULSE; NCT04144881]).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
42.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
5097
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) publishes peer-reviewed articles highlighting all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance, state-of-the-art papers and viewpoints. Content Profile: -Original Investigations -JACC State-of-the-Art Reviews -JACC Review Topics of the Week -Guidelines & Clinical Documents -JACC Guideline Comparisons -JACC Scientific Expert Panels -Cardiovascular Medicine & Society -Editorial Comments (accompanying every Original Investigation) -Research Letters -Fellows-in-Training/Early Career Professional Pages -Editor’s Pages from the Editor-in-Chief or other invited thought leaders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信