职业足球运动员季前赛单关节等长腿筋力量评分。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Nicholas Joel Ripley, Jack T Fahey, Paul Comfort, John J McMahon, Paul A Jones, Christopher Bramah
{"title":"职业足球运动员季前赛单关节等长腿筋力量评分。","authors":"Nicholas Joel Ripley, Jack T Fahey, Paul Comfort, John J McMahon, Paul A Jones, Christopher Bramah","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Ripley, NJ, Fahey, JT, Comfort, P, McMahon, JJ, Jones, PA, and Bramah, C. Normative single joint isometric hamstring strength scores from professional soccer players during pre-season. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-Monitoring changes in isometric force production from the hamstrings has become increasingly common in team sports. With an increase in force plate availability in soccer, isometric hamstring assessments have become popular, yet normative benchmarks do not currently exist. The purpose of this study was to provide normative force production benchmarks for professional soccer players obtained during isometric hamstring assessments. One hundred forty-two senior professional men's soccer players (age, 24.56 ± 5.09 years; height, 183.63 ± 5.84 cm; mass, 82.12 ± 8.35 kg) performed 2 isometric assessments with 30° and 90° of hip flexion and similar knee joint angles. Mean and standard deviation were determined across 3 trials, differences between soccer positions (goalkeeper, defender, midfielder, and strikers) and differences between limbs were determined through one-way ANOVA. p value was set at <0.05, and effect size was calculated using Cohens d. Benchmarks were developed using T-scores. Trivial-moderate positional differences (d = 0.09-0.95) were observed for absolute peak force, whereas only trivial positional differences (d = 0.00-0.01) were observed for relative peak force (i.e., peak force/body mass). Trivial between limb differences (d = 0.12-0.13) were observed for assessment performed at 90°; however, small differences were observed in the 30° test (d = 0.27-0.29). Benchmark values are provided for relative peak force due to no meaningful difference between positions. Practitioners could use the normative benchmarks provided to determine training needs and establish specific goals. The isometric hamstring assessment positioned at 30° of knee and hip flexion may be more sensitive to determine interlimb differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normative Single Joint Isometric Hamstring Strength Scores From Professional Soccer Players During Preseason.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Joel Ripley, Jack T Fahey, Paul Comfort, John J McMahon, Paul A Jones, Christopher Bramah\",\"doi\":\"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Ripley, NJ, Fahey, JT, Comfort, P, McMahon, JJ, Jones, PA, and Bramah, C. Normative single joint isometric hamstring strength scores from professional soccer players during pre-season. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-Monitoring changes in isometric force production from the hamstrings has become increasingly common in team sports. With an increase in force plate availability in soccer, isometric hamstring assessments have become popular, yet normative benchmarks do not currently exist. The purpose of this study was to provide normative force production benchmarks for professional soccer players obtained during isometric hamstring assessments. One hundred forty-two senior professional men's soccer players (age, 24.56 ± 5.09 years; height, 183.63 ± 5.84 cm; mass, 82.12 ± 8.35 kg) performed 2 isometric assessments with 30° and 90° of hip flexion and similar knee joint angles. Mean and standard deviation were determined across 3 trials, differences between soccer positions (goalkeeper, defender, midfielder, and strikers) and differences between limbs were determined through one-way ANOVA. p value was set at <0.05, and effect size was calculated using Cohens d. Benchmarks were developed using T-scores. Trivial-moderate positional differences (d = 0.09-0.95) were observed for absolute peak force, whereas only trivial positional differences (d = 0.00-0.01) were observed for relative peak force (i.e., peak force/body mass). Trivial between limb differences (d = 0.12-0.13) were observed for assessment performed at 90°; however, small differences were observed in the 30° test (d = 0.27-0.29). Benchmark values are provided for relative peak force due to no meaningful difference between positions. Practitioners could use the normative benchmarks provided to determine training needs and establish specific goals. The isometric hamstring assessment positioned at 30° of knee and hip flexion may be more sensitive to determine interlimb differences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005217\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要/ Abstract摘要:Ripley, NJ, Fahey, JT, Comfort, P, McMahon, JJ, Jones, PA和Bramah, C.职业足球运动员季前赛单关节腘绳肌力量指标。[强度分析][X]: 000- 000,2025 -在团队运动中,监测腿筋产生的等距力的变化已经变得越来越普遍。随着力板在足球运动中的可用性的增加,等距腿筋评估已经变得流行,但目前还没有规范的基准。本研究的目的是为职业足球运动员在腿筋等长评估中获得的规范性力量生产基准提供参考。对142名高级职业男子足球运动员(年龄24.56±5.09岁,身高183.63±5.84 cm,体重82.12±8.35 kg)进行了髋关节30°和90°屈曲和相似膝关节角度的2次等距评估。通过单因素方差分析确定3个试验的均值和标准差,足球位置(守门员、后卫、中场和前锋)之间的差异以及肢体之间的差异。P值设为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Normative Single Joint Isometric Hamstring Strength Scores From Professional Soccer Players During Preseason.

Abstract: Ripley, NJ, Fahey, JT, Comfort, P, McMahon, JJ, Jones, PA, and Bramah, C. Normative single joint isometric hamstring strength scores from professional soccer players during pre-season. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-Monitoring changes in isometric force production from the hamstrings has become increasingly common in team sports. With an increase in force plate availability in soccer, isometric hamstring assessments have become popular, yet normative benchmarks do not currently exist. The purpose of this study was to provide normative force production benchmarks for professional soccer players obtained during isometric hamstring assessments. One hundred forty-two senior professional men's soccer players (age, 24.56 ± 5.09 years; height, 183.63 ± 5.84 cm; mass, 82.12 ± 8.35 kg) performed 2 isometric assessments with 30° and 90° of hip flexion and similar knee joint angles. Mean and standard deviation were determined across 3 trials, differences between soccer positions (goalkeeper, defender, midfielder, and strikers) and differences between limbs were determined through one-way ANOVA. p value was set at <0.05, and effect size was calculated using Cohens d. Benchmarks were developed using T-scores. Trivial-moderate positional differences (d = 0.09-0.95) were observed for absolute peak force, whereas only trivial positional differences (d = 0.00-0.01) were observed for relative peak force (i.e., peak force/body mass). Trivial between limb differences (d = 0.12-0.13) were observed for assessment performed at 90°; however, small differences were observed in the 30° test (d = 0.27-0.29). Benchmark values are provided for relative peak force due to no meaningful difference between positions. Practitioners could use the normative benchmarks provided to determine training needs and establish specific goals. The isometric hamstring assessment positioned at 30° of knee and hip flexion may be more sensitive to determine interlimb differences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信