父母对儿童主动游戏运动能力影响的纵向分析。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
R Hänisch, J Carl, K D Hesketh, L M Barnett
{"title":"父母对儿童主动游戏运动能力影响的纵向分析。","authors":"R Hänisch, J Carl, K D Hesketh, L M Barnett","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2550052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although active play contributes to children's physical activity (PA) levels, the parental influences on the development of motor competence for active play are unknown. Therefore, this study analysed whether parental influences predicted their child's motor competence for active play. Data from the InFANT cohort study, collected at ages 5 and 9.5 years, included 199 parent-child pairs. Parents self-reported on their parenting efficacy (<i>α</i> = 0.76), facilitation (<i>α</i> = 0.74) and attitude (<i>α</i> = 0.58) towards children's PA at age 5. At 9.5 years, parents proxy-reported their child's motor competence for active play. Separate and multivariate regression models tested the three parenting constructs as predictors of motor competence for active play, adjusted for covariates (child sex, socioeconomic position, child's 5-year motor competence). Parental efficacy (<i>β</i> = 0.25), facilitation (<i>β</i> = 0.29) and attitude (<i>β</i> = 0.25) each served as significant predictors of motor competence for active play in the separate models. In the multivariate model, parental facilitation (<i>β</i> = 0.20, <i>p</i> < 0.01) dominated the predictive power for children's motor competence for active play; attitude (<i>β</i> = 0.17, <i>p</i> = 0.03) still had a significant effect but not efficacy (<i>β</i> = 0.13, <i>p</i> = 0.15). The findings highlight the importance of targeting parents in promoting children's development of motor competence, with a focus on effective facilitation of physically active lifestyles in unstructured activity contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parental influence on children's motor competence for active play: A longitudinal analysis.\",\"authors\":\"R Hänisch, J Carl, K D Hesketh, L M Barnett\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02640414.2025.2550052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although active play contributes to children's physical activity (PA) levels, the parental influences on the development of motor competence for active play are unknown. Therefore, this study analysed whether parental influences predicted their child's motor competence for active play. Data from the InFANT cohort study, collected at ages 5 and 9.5 years, included 199 parent-child pairs. Parents self-reported on their parenting efficacy (<i>α</i> = 0.76), facilitation (<i>α</i> = 0.74) and attitude (<i>α</i> = 0.58) towards children's PA at age 5. At 9.5 years, parents proxy-reported their child's motor competence for active play. Separate and multivariate regression models tested the three parenting constructs as predictors of motor competence for active play, adjusted for covariates (child sex, socioeconomic position, child's 5-year motor competence). Parental efficacy (<i>β</i> = 0.25), facilitation (<i>β</i> = 0.29) and attitude (<i>β</i> = 0.25) each served as significant predictors of motor competence for active play in the separate models. In the multivariate model, parental facilitation (<i>β</i> = 0.20, <i>p</i> < 0.01) dominated the predictive power for children's motor competence for active play; attitude (<i>β</i> = 0.17, <i>p</i> = 0.03) still had a significant effect but not efficacy (<i>β</i> = 0.13, <i>p</i> = 0.15). The findings highlight the importance of targeting parents in promoting children's development of motor competence, with a focus on effective facilitation of physically active lifestyles in unstructured activity contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2550052\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2550052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然积极游戏有助于儿童的身体活动水平,但父母对积极游戏运动能力发展的影响尚不清楚。因此,本研究分析了父母的影响是否能预测孩子主动游戏的运动能力。婴儿队列研究的数据收集于5岁和9.5岁,包括199对亲子。父母在5岁时对孩子的育儿效能(α = 0.76)、促进(α = 0.74)和态度(α = 0.58)进行了自我报告。在孩子9.5岁时,父母代理报告孩子积极玩耍的运动能力。独立和多元回归模型检验了三种养育方式作为主动游戏运动能力的预测因子,并对协变量(儿童性别、社会经济地位、儿童5岁运动能力)进行了调整。父母效能(β = 0.25)、促进(β = 0.29)和态度(β = 0.25)均可作为主动游戏运动能力的显著预测因子。在多变量模型中,亲本诱导(β = 0.20, p β = 0.17, p = 0.03)仍有显著影响,但无疗效(β = 0.13, p = 0.15)。研究结果强调了以父母为目标促进儿童运动能力发展的重要性,重点是在非结构化活动环境中有效地促进身体活动的生活方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parental influence on children's motor competence for active play: A longitudinal analysis.

Although active play contributes to children's physical activity (PA) levels, the parental influences on the development of motor competence for active play are unknown. Therefore, this study analysed whether parental influences predicted their child's motor competence for active play. Data from the InFANT cohort study, collected at ages 5 and 9.5 years, included 199 parent-child pairs. Parents self-reported on their parenting efficacy (α = 0.76), facilitation (α = 0.74) and attitude (α = 0.58) towards children's PA at age 5. At 9.5 years, parents proxy-reported their child's motor competence for active play. Separate and multivariate regression models tested the three parenting constructs as predictors of motor competence for active play, adjusted for covariates (child sex, socioeconomic position, child's 5-year motor competence). Parental efficacy (β = 0.25), facilitation (β = 0.29) and attitude (β = 0.25) each served as significant predictors of motor competence for active play in the separate models. In the multivariate model, parental facilitation (β = 0.20, p < 0.01) dominated the predictive power for children's motor competence for active play; attitude (β = 0.17, p = 0.03) still had a significant effect but not efficacy (β = 0.13, p = 0.15). The findings highlight the importance of targeting parents in promoting children's development of motor competence, with a focus on effective facilitation of physically active lifestyles in unstructured activity contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信