在温暖天气的公路比赛中,体温可穿戴设备与胃肠测温仪的比较。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Cecilia E Kaufman, Michael R Szymanski, Gabrielle J Brewer, Rebecca L Stearns, Douglas J Casa, Robert A Huggins
{"title":"在温暖天气的公路比赛中,体温可穿戴设备与胃肠测温仪的比较。","authors":"Cecilia E Kaufman, Michael R Szymanski, Gabrielle J Brewer, Rebecca L Stearns, Douglas J Casa, Robert A Huggins","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Kaufman, CE, Szymanski, MR, Brewer, GJ, Stearns, RL, Casa, DJ, and Huggins, RA. Comparison of a body temperature wearable device with gastrointestinal thermometry during a warm-weather road race. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-To compare estimated measures of a wearable body temperature device with gastrointestinal temperature during and at the finish of a road race. Fourteen recreational runners ([n = 9 men, n = 5 women] [mean ± SD] age: 48 ± 14 years, V̇O2peak: 47.66 ± 8.21 ml·kg-1·min-1) were recruited. The wearable body temperature device and gastrointestinal temperature were measured and compared throughout the duration of the race and at race finish (p < 0.05). During race: Poor agreement and a high, positive relationship (Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient [CCC] = 0.70, 95% Limits of Agreement [LOA] ± 0.94° C, r = 0.78) were noted between the wearable body temperature device and gastrointestinal temperature. No interaction was exhibited between time and device (p = 0.087). At race finish: Poor agreement and a low, positive relationship (CCC = 0.30, 95% LOA±1.20° C, r = 0.43) were noted between the wearable body temperature device and gastrointestinal temperature. During continuous exercise in a warm weather race, the wearable body temperature device was within the acceptable limits (±0.27° C) compared with gastrointestinal temperature. The wearable body temperature device reported the widest LOA in the race finish analyses. Typical error of estimate suggests that the mean bias values may be attributed to error. Further validation is crucial in higher internal body temperatures (>39.5° C) in varying populations, environments, and intensities both pre- and postexercise Currently, this device is not acceptable for medical use or clinical diagnosis of exertional heat stroke. Medical personnel (e.g., athletic trainers, team physicians) and additional personnel (e.g., coaches, military officers, safety managers) can benefit from valid, continuous, real-time internal body temperature monitoring in the heat.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of a Body Temperature Wearable Device With Gastrointestinal Thermometry During a Warm-Weather Road Race.\",\"authors\":\"Cecilia E Kaufman, Michael R Szymanski, Gabrielle J Brewer, Rebecca L Stearns, Douglas J Casa, Robert A Huggins\",\"doi\":\"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Kaufman, CE, Szymanski, MR, Brewer, GJ, Stearns, RL, Casa, DJ, and Huggins, RA. Comparison of a body temperature wearable device with gastrointestinal thermometry during a warm-weather road race. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-To compare estimated measures of a wearable body temperature device with gastrointestinal temperature during and at the finish of a road race. Fourteen recreational runners ([n = 9 men, n = 5 women] [mean ± SD] age: 48 ± 14 years, V̇O2peak: 47.66 ± 8.21 ml·kg-1·min-1) were recruited. The wearable body temperature device and gastrointestinal temperature were measured and compared throughout the duration of the race and at race finish (p < 0.05). During race: Poor agreement and a high, positive relationship (Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient [CCC] = 0.70, 95% Limits of Agreement [LOA] ± 0.94° C, r = 0.78) were noted between the wearable body temperature device and gastrointestinal temperature. No interaction was exhibited between time and device (p = 0.087). At race finish: Poor agreement and a low, positive relationship (CCC = 0.30, 95% LOA±1.20° C, r = 0.43) were noted between the wearable body temperature device and gastrointestinal temperature. During continuous exercise in a warm weather race, the wearable body temperature device was within the acceptable limits (±0.27° C) compared with gastrointestinal temperature. The wearable body temperature device reported the widest LOA in the race finish analyses. Typical error of estimate suggests that the mean bias values may be attributed to error. Further validation is crucial in higher internal body temperatures (>39.5° C) in varying populations, environments, and intensities both pre- and postexercise Currently, this device is not acceptable for medical use or clinical diagnosis of exertional heat stroke. Medical personnel (e.g., athletic trainers, team physicians) and additional personnel (e.g., coaches, military officers, safety managers) can benefit from valid, continuous, real-time internal body temperature monitoring in the heat.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005213\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005213","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:Kaufman, CE, Szymanski, MR, Brewer, GJ, Stearns, RL, Casa, DJ和Huggins, RA。在温暖天气的公路比赛中,体温可穿戴设备与胃肠测温仪的比较。[J] .中国医学工程学报,2016,34(2):444 - 444 - 444 - 444。招募14名休闲跑步者(男9名,女5名)[mean±SD],年龄:48±14岁,峰值:47.66±8.21 ml·kg-1·min-1)。在整个比赛过程中和比赛结束时测量可穿戴体温仪和胃肠温度(p < 0.05)。在比赛中:可穿戴体温计与胃肠道温度的一致性较差,但存在较高的正相关关系(Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient [CCC] = 0.70, 95%一致性限[LOA]±0.94°C, r = 0.78)。时间与设备无交互作用(p = 0.087)。在比赛结束时:可穿戴体温装置与胃肠道温度之间的一致性较差,呈低正相关(CCC = 0.30, 95% LOA±1.20°C, r = 0.43)。在温暖天气的比赛中持续运动时,可穿戴体温装置与胃肠温度相比在可接受范围内(±0.27°C)。可穿戴体温设备在比赛终点分析中报告了最宽的LOA。典型误差估计表明,平均偏差值可能归因于误差。在不同人群、环境和运动前后强度的较高体内温度(>39.5°C)下,进一步验证是至关重要的。目前,该设备不适合用于医疗或临床诊断运动性中暑。医务人员(例如,运动教练、队医)和其他人员(例如,教练、军官、安全管理人员)可以从高温下有效、连续、实时的内部体温监测中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of a Body Temperature Wearable Device With Gastrointestinal Thermometry During a Warm-Weather Road Race.

Abstract: Kaufman, CE, Szymanski, MR, Brewer, GJ, Stearns, RL, Casa, DJ, and Huggins, RA. Comparison of a body temperature wearable device with gastrointestinal thermometry during a warm-weather road race. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-To compare estimated measures of a wearable body temperature device with gastrointestinal temperature during and at the finish of a road race. Fourteen recreational runners ([n = 9 men, n = 5 women] [mean ± SD] age: 48 ± 14 years, V̇O2peak: 47.66 ± 8.21 ml·kg-1·min-1) were recruited. The wearable body temperature device and gastrointestinal temperature were measured and compared throughout the duration of the race and at race finish (p < 0.05). During race: Poor agreement and a high, positive relationship (Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient [CCC] = 0.70, 95% Limits of Agreement [LOA] ± 0.94° C, r = 0.78) were noted between the wearable body temperature device and gastrointestinal temperature. No interaction was exhibited between time and device (p = 0.087). At race finish: Poor agreement and a low, positive relationship (CCC = 0.30, 95% LOA±1.20° C, r = 0.43) were noted between the wearable body temperature device and gastrointestinal temperature. During continuous exercise in a warm weather race, the wearable body temperature device was within the acceptable limits (±0.27° C) compared with gastrointestinal temperature. The wearable body temperature device reported the widest LOA in the race finish analyses. Typical error of estimate suggests that the mean bias values may be attributed to error. Further validation is crucial in higher internal body temperatures (>39.5° C) in varying populations, environments, and intensities both pre- and postexercise Currently, this device is not acceptable for medical use or clinical diagnosis of exertional heat stroke. Medical personnel (e.g., athletic trainers, team physicians) and additional personnel (e.g., coaches, military officers, safety managers) can benefit from valid, continuous, real-time internal body temperature monitoring in the heat.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信