机器人辅助DIEP皮瓣收获:呼吁对手术风险进行平衡讨论。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Raymund E Horch, Andreas Arkudas
{"title":"机器人辅助DIEP皮瓣收获:呼吁对手术风险进行平衡讨论。","authors":"Raymund E Horch, Andreas Arkudas","doi":"10.1055/a-2690-9728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We commend Choe et al. for their technically detailed report on robotic-assisted deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap harvest. While recognizing the promise of robotic surgery in microsurgical applications, we believe a more critical evaluation of the intraabdominal approach is warranted. The technique's emphasis on reduced fascial incision length must be weighed against underexplored risks, including potential intraabdominal complications, peritoneal entry, adhesions, increased hernia risk from multiple port sites, and the physiologic effects of gas insufflation. Additionally, longer ischemia times and total operative duration should be considered when assessing overall surgical benefit. This letter highlights key concerns and encourages a balanced discussion on the true trade-offs of robotic-assisted DIEP flap harvest within the evolving field of reconstructive microsurgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic-Assisted DIEP Flap Harvest: A Call for Balanced Discussion of Surgical Risk.\",\"authors\":\"Raymund E Horch, Andreas Arkudas\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2690-9728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We commend Choe et al. for their technically detailed report on robotic-assisted deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap harvest. While recognizing the promise of robotic surgery in microsurgical applications, we believe a more critical evaluation of the intraabdominal approach is warranted. The technique's emphasis on reduced fascial incision length must be weighed against underexplored risks, including potential intraabdominal complications, peritoneal entry, adhesions, increased hernia risk from multiple port sites, and the physiologic effects of gas insufflation. Additionally, longer ischemia times and total operative duration should be considered when assessing overall surgical benefit. This letter highlights key concerns and encourages a balanced discussion on the true trade-offs of robotic-assisted DIEP flap harvest within the evolving field of reconstructive microsurgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2690-9728\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2690-9728","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们赞扬Choe等人对机器人辅助的深下胃壁穿支(DIEP)皮瓣切除术的技术详细报道。虽然认识到机器人手术在显微外科应用中的前景,但我们认为对腹腔内入路进行更严格的评估是有必要的。该技术强调减少筋膜切口长度,但必须权衡未充分探索的风险,包括潜在的腹内并发症、腹膜进入、粘连、多个端口的疝风险增加以及气体注入的生理影响。此外,在评估总体手术收益时,应考虑更长的缺血时间和总手术时间。这封信强调了关键问题,并鼓励在不断发展的重建显微外科领域中对机器人辅助DIEP皮瓣收获的真正权衡进行平衡的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robotic-Assisted DIEP Flap Harvest: A Call for Balanced Discussion of Surgical Risk.

We commend Choe et al. for their technically detailed report on robotic-assisted deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap harvest. While recognizing the promise of robotic surgery in microsurgical applications, we believe a more critical evaluation of the intraabdominal approach is warranted. The technique's emphasis on reduced fascial incision length must be weighed against underexplored risks, including potential intraabdominal complications, peritoneal entry, adhesions, increased hernia risk from multiple port sites, and the physiologic effects of gas insufflation. Additionally, longer ischemia times and total operative duration should be considered when assessing overall surgical benefit. This letter highlights key concerns and encourages a balanced discussion on the true trade-offs of robotic-assisted DIEP flap harvest within the evolving field of reconstructive microsurgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信