光生物调节对单次治疗后牙髓后疼痛的影响:一项随机双盲临床试验。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Glaucia Gonçales Abud Machado, Giovanna Fontgalland Ferreira, Erika da Silva Mello, Ellen Sayuri Ando-Suguimoto, Vinicius Leão Roncolato, Marcia Regina Cabral Oliveira, Janainy Altrão Tognini, Adriana Fernandes Paisano, Cleber Pinto Camacho, Sandra Kalil Bussadori, Lara Jansiski Motta, Cinthya Cosme Gutierrez Duran, Raquel Agnelli Mesquita-Ferrari, Kristianne Porta Santos Fernandes, Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini Horliana
{"title":"光生物调节对单次治疗后牙髓后疼痛的影响:一项随机双盲临床试验。","authors":"Glaucia Gonçales Abud Machado, Giovanna Fontgalland Ferreira, Erika da Silva Mello, Ellen Sayuri Ando-Suguimoto, Vinicius Leão Roncolato, Marcia Regina Cabral Oliveira, Janainy Altrão Tognini, Adriana Fernandes Paisano, Cleber Pinto Camacho, Sandra Kalil Bussadori, Lara Jansiski Motta, Cinthya Cosme Gutierrez Duran, Raquel Agnelli Mesquita-Ferrari, Kristianne Porta Santos Fernandes, Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini Horliana","doi":"10.3390/jpm15080347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The evidence for photobiomodulation in reducing postoperative pain after endodontic instrumentation is classified as low or very low certainty, indicating a need for further research. Longitudinal pain assessments over 24 h are crucial, and studies should explore these pain periods. <b>Background/Objectives</b>: This double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the effect of PBM on pain following single-visit endodontic treatment of maxillary molars at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h. Primary outcomes included pain at 24 h; secondary outcomes included pain at 4, 8, and 12 h, pain during palpation/percussion, OHIP-14 analysis, and frequencies of pain. <b>Methods</b>: Approved by the Research Ethics Committee (5.598.290) and registered in Clinical Trials (NCT06253767), the study recruited adults (21-70 years) requiring endodontic treatment in maxillary molars. Fifty-eight molars were randomly assigned to two groups: the PBM Group (<i>n</i> = 29), receiving conventional endodontic treatment with PBM (100 mW, 333 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>, 9 J distributed at 3 points near root apices), and the control group (<i>n</i> = 29), receiving conventional treatment with PBM simulation. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale. <b>Results</b>: Statistical analyses used chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests, with explained variance (η<sup>2</sup>). Ten participants were excluded, leaving 48 patients for analysis. No significant differences were observed in postoperative pain at 24, 4, 8, or 12 h, or in palpation/percussion or OHIP-14 scores. Pain frequencies ranged from 12.5% to 25%. <b>Conclusions</b>: PBM does not influence post-treatment pain in maxillary molars under these conditions. These results emphasize the importance of relying on well-designed clinical trials to guide treatment decisions, and future research should focus on personalized dosimetry adapted to the anatomical characteristics of the treated dental region to enhance the accuracy and efficacy of therapeutic protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12387253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Photobiomodulation on Post-Endodontic Pain Following Single-Visit Treatment: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Glaucia Gonçales Abud Machado, Giovanna Fontgalland Ferreira, Erika da Silva Mello, Ellen Sayuri Ando-Suguimoto, Vinicius Leão Roncolato, Marcia Regina Cabral Oliveira, Janainy Altrão Tognini, Adriana Fernandes Paisano, Cleber Pinto Camacho, Sandra Kalil Bussadori, Lara Jansiski Motta, Cinthya Cosme Gutierrez Duran, Raquel Agnelli Mesquita-Ferrari, Kristianne Porta Santos Fernandes, Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini Horliana\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jpm15080347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The evidence for photobiomodulation in reducing postoperative pain after endodontic instrumentation is classified as low or very low certainty, indicating a need for further research. Longitudinal pain assessments over 24 h are crucial, and studies should explore these pain periods. <b>Background/Objectives</b>: This double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the effect of PBM on pain following single-visit endodontic treatment of maxillary molars at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h. Primary outcomes included pain at 24 h; secondary outcomes included pain at 4, 8, and 12 h, pain during palpation/percussion, OHIP-14 analysis, and frequencies of pain. <b>Methods</b>: Approved by the Research Ethics Committee (5.598.290) and registered in Clinical Trials (NCT06253767), the study recruited adults (21-70 years) requiring endodontic treatment in maxillary molars. Fifty-eight molars were randomly assigned to two groups: the PBM Group (<i>n</i> = 29), receiving conventional endodontic treatment with PBM (100 mW, 333 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>, 9 J distributed at 3 points near root apices), and the control group (<i>n</i> = 29), receiving conventional treatment with PBM simulation. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale. <b>Results</b>: Statistical analyses used chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests, with explained variance (η<sup>2</sup>). Ten participants were excluded, leaving 48 patients for analysis. No significant differences were observed in postoperative pain at 24, 4, 8, or 12 h, or in palpation/percussion or OHIP-14 scores. Pain frequencies ranged from 12.5% to 25%. <b>Conclusions</b>: PBM does not influence post-treatment pain in maxillary molars under these conditions. These results emphasize the importance of relying on well-designed clinical trials to guide treatment decisions, and future research should focus on personalized dosimetry adapted to the anatomical characteristics of the treated dental region to enhance the accuracy and efficacy of therapeutic protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Personalized Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12387253/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Personalized Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15080347\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15080347","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

光生物调节减少根管内固定术后疼痛的证据被归类为低或非常低的确定性,表明需要进一步的研究。24小时的纵向疼痛评估是至关重要的,研究应该探索这些疼痛期。背景/目的:这项双盲、随机对照临床试验评估了PBM对上颌磨牙单次根管治疗后4、8、12和24小时疼痛的影响。主要结局包括24小时疼痛;次要结局包括4、8和12小时疼痛、触诊/叩诊时疼痛、OHIP-14分析和疼痛频率。方法:经研究伦理委员会(5.598.290)批准,注册临床试验(NCT06253767),招募需要上颌磨牙根管治疗的成人(21-70岁)。将58颗磨牙随机分为两组:PBM组(n = 29),采用PBM常规根管治疗(100 mW, 333 mW/cm2, 9 J分布在根尖附近3个点),对照组(n = 29),采用PBM模拟常规治疗。采用视觉模拟量表评估疼痛。结果:统计分析采用卡方检验和Mann-Whitney检验,方差解释(η为2)。10名参与者被排除,留下48名患者进行分析。术后24、4、8、12小时疼痛、触诊/叩诊或OHIP-14评分均无显著差异。疼痛频率从12.5%到25%不等。结论:PBM对治疗后上颌磨牙疼痛无明显影响。这些结果强调了依靠精心设计的临床试验来指导治疗决策的重要性,未来的研究应侧重于适应治疗牙齿区域解剖特征的个性化剂量测定,以提高治疗方案的准确性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of Photobiomodulation on Post-Endodontic Pain Following Single-Visit Treatment: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Effect of Photobiomodulation on Post-Endodontic Pain Following Single-Visit Treatment: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Effect of Photobiomodulation on Post-Endodontic Pain Following Single-Visit Treatment: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Effect of Photobiomodulation on Post-Endodontic Pain Following Single-Visit Treatment: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

The evidence for photobiomodulation in reducing postoperative pain after endodontic instrumentation is classified as low or very low certainty, indicating a need for further research. Longitudinal pain assessments over 24 h are crucial, and studies should explore these pain periods. Background/Objectives: This double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the effect of PBM on pain following single-visit endodontic treatment of maxillary molars at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h. Primary outcomes included pain at 24 h; secondary outcomes included pain at 4, 8, and 12 h, pain during palpation/percussion, OHIP-14 analysis, and frequencies of pain. Methods: Approved by the Research Ethics Committee (5.598.290) and registered in Clinical Trials (NCT06253767), the study recruited adults (21-70 years) requiring endodontic treatment in maxillary molars. Fifty-eight molars were randomly assigned to two groups: the PBM Group (n = 29), receiving conventional endodontic treatment with PBM (100 mW, 333 mW/cm2, 9 J distributed at 3 points near root apices), and the control group (n = 29), receiving conventional treatment with PBM simulation. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale. Results: Statistical analyses used chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests, with explained variance (η2). Ten participants were excluded, leaving 48 patients for analysis. No significant differences were observed in postoperative pain at 24, 4, 8, or 12 h, or in palpation/percussion or OHIP-14 scores. Pain frequencies ranged from 12.5% to 25%. Conclusions: PBM does not influence post-treatment pain in maxillary molars under these conditions. These results emphasize the importance of relying on well-designed clinical trials to guide treatment decisions, and future research should focus on personalized dosimetry adapted to the anatomical characteristics of the treated dental region to enhance the accuracy and efficacy of therapeutic protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信