{"title":"从筛查到治疗:国家新生儿重症监护室环境下ROP的个性化方法。","authors":"Stylianos Christodoulou, Fedonas Herodotou, Annalisa Quattrocchi, Theodoros Potamitis, Vivi Choleva","doi":"10.3390/jpm15080388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim</b>: We aimed to investigate the incidence, treatment patterns, and associated risk factors of type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in the only tertiary-level Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) in Cyprus. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study included all infants screened for ROP between January and December 2023. Data were collected from standardized NICU discharge summaries and included gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW), multiple birth, systemic infection, blood transfusion, oxygen therapy, surgical interventions, and ROP outcomes. Infants were categorized into non-ROP, non-type 1 ROP, and type 1 ROP groups. Statistical analysis was performed to identify differences in risk factor distribution. <b>Results</b>: Among 183 infants, 33 (18.0%) developed ROP, with 11 (6.0%) requiring treatment for type 1 ROP. All infants with type 1 ROP were born at ≤28 weeks GA and weighed <1501 g. Type 1 ROP was significantly associated with lower GA, lower BW, systemic infection, surgery, and prolonged oxygen support (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Six infants were treated with laser and three with intravitreal bevacizumab. No recurrence was observed in the anti-VEGF group during 18 months of follow-up. Two infants with aggressive ROP died before treatment. <b>Conclusions</b>: Type 1 ROP in Cyprus occurred exclusively in extremely preterm infants, associated with the cumulative effect of multiple risk factors. Laser remained the primary treatment, while anti-VEGF was used selectively with favorable outcomes. This study emphasizes the importance of tailoring ROP screening and treatment strategies based on individual neonatal risk profiles, supporting a personalized approach to neonatal ophthalmic care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12387620/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Screening to Therapy: A Personalized Approach to ROP in a National NICU Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Stylianos Christodoulou, Fedonas Herodotou, Annalisa Quattrocchi, Theodoros Potamitis, Vivi Choleva\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jpm15080388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim</b>: We aimed to investigate the incidence, treatment patterns, and associated risk factors of type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in the only tertiary-level Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) in Cyprus. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study included all infants screened for ROP between January and December 2023. Data were collected from standardized NICU discharge summaries and included gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW), multiple birth, systemic infection, blood transfusion, oxygen therapy, surgical interventions, and ROP outcomes. Infants were categorized into non-ROP, non-type 1 ROP, and type 1 ROP groups. Statistical analysis was performed to identify differences in risk factor distribution. <b>Results</b>: Among 183 infants, 33 (18.0%) developed ROP, with 11 (6.0%) requiring treatment for type 1 ROP. All infants with type 1 ROP were born at ≤28 weeks GA and weighed <1501 g. Type 1 ROP was significantly associated with lower GA, lower BW, systemic infection, surgery, and prolonged oxygen support (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Six infants were treated with laser and three with intravitreal bevacizumab. No recurrence was observed in the anti-VEGF group during 18 months of follow-up. Two infants with aggressive ROP died before treatment. <b>Conclusions</b>: Type 1 ROP in Cyprus occurred exclusively in extremely preterm infants, associated with the cumulative effect of multiple risk factors. Laser remained the primary treatment, while anti-VEGF was used selectively with favorable outcomes. This study emphasizes the importance of tailoring ROP screening and treatment strategies based on individual neonatal risk profiles, supporting a personalized approach to neonatal ophthalmic care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Personalized Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12387620/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Personalized Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15080388\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15080388","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
From Screening to Therapy: A Personalized Approach to ROP in a National NICU Setting.
Aim: We aimed to investigate the incidence, treatment patterns, and associated risk factors of type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in the only tertiary-level Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) in Cyprus. Methods: This retrospective study included all infants screened for ROP between January and December 2023. Data were collected from standardized NICU discharge summaries and included gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW), multiple birth, systemic infection, blood transfusion, oxygen therapy, surgical interventions, and ROP outcomes. Infants were categorized into non-ROP, non-type 1 ROP, and type 1 ROP groups. Statistical analysis was performed to identify differences in risk factor distribution. Results: Among 183 infants, 33 (18.0%) developed ROP, with 11 (6.0%) requiring treatment for type 1 ROP. All infants with type 1 ROP were born at ≤28 weeks GA and weighed <1501 g. Type 1 ROP was significantly associated with lower GA, lower BW, systemic infection, surgery, and prolonged oxygen support (p < 0.05). Six infants were treated with laser and three with intravitreal bevacizumab. No recurrence was observed in the anti-VEGF group during 18 months of follow-up. Two infants with aggressive ROP died before treatment. Conclusions: Type 1 ROP in Cyprus occurred exclusively in extremely preterm infants, associated with the cumulative effect of multiple risk factors. Laser remained the primary treatment, while anti-VEGF was used selectively with favorable outcomes. This study emphasizes the importance of tailoring ROP screening and treatment strategies based on individual neonatal risk profiles, supporting a personalized approach to neonatal ophthalmic care.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.