Tianyou Hu, Yujie Bian, Qiankun Wang, Tao Zhou, Hongxiang Zhou
{"title":"肘管综合征手术中经皮与皮下筋膜瓣固定的短期疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Tianyou Hu, Yujie Bian, Qiankun Wang, Tao Zhou, Hongxiang Zhou","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-06200-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Percutaneous external suturing has been proposed as an alternative approach to fascial flap fixation during anterior subcutaneous transposition for cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS), with the aim of minimizing deep tissue disruption and reducing postoperative complications. This study compared short-term outcomes between percutaneous external fixation and traditional subcutaneous fixation of fascial flaps in CuTS surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, 114 patients who underwent anterior ulnar nerve transposition with fascial flap coverage were enrolled between January 2020 and December 2023. Patients were grouped based on the method of fascial flap fixation: subcutaneous (n = 57) or percutaneous (n = 57). Clinical assessments-including Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation (PRUNE), and Cubital Tunnel Syndrome Functional Score-along with nerve conduction studies (CMAP, SNCV, MNCV), were performed preoperatively and at 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the subcutaneous group, the percutaneous group showed significantly greater improvement in VAS scores (VAS: -2.75 vs. -1.99, p < 0.001), PRUNE scores (PRUNE: -23.78 vs. -17.64, p < 0.001), and functional scores (Score: +3.58 vs. + 2.70, p = 0.0004). Increases in SNCV (16.45 m/s vs. 14.51 m/s, p = 0.035) and MNCV (18.55 m/s vs. 12.13 m/s, p < 0.001) were also more pronounced in the percutaneous group. Although CMAP improved in both groups, postoperative CMAP values were slightly higher in the subcutaneous group (6.02 ± 0.85 mV vs. 5.40 ± 0.51 mV, p = 0.002). No infections or wound complications occurred in either group; two reoperations for recurrent compression were required in the subcutaneous group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Percutaneous external suturing may represent a safe and promising alternative for fascial flap fixation during CuTS surgery, with potential benefits in early postoperative pain relief, nerve conduction, and functional outcomes. However, longer-term studies are needed to assess durability and potential late complications.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was retrospectively registered with the Institutional Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (Approval No. PJ2024-12-17).</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"792"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374454/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-term outcomes of percutaneous versus subcutaneous fascial flap fixation in cubital tunnel syndrome surgery: A retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Tianyou Hu, Yujie Bian, Qiankun Wang, Tao Zhou, Hongxiang Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13018-025-06200-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Percutaneous external suturing has been proposed as an alternative approach to fascial flap fixation during anterior subcutaneous transposition for cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS), with the aim of minimizing deep tissue disruption and reducing postoperative complications. This study compared short-term outcomes between percutaneous external fixation and traditional subcutaneous fixation of fascial flaps in CuTS surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, 114 patients who underwent anterior ulnar nerve transposition with fascial flap coverage were enrolled between January 2020 and December 2023. Patients were grouped based on the method of fascial flap fixation: subcutaneous (n = 57) or percutaneous (n = 57). Clinical assessments-including Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation (PRUNE), and Cubital Tunnel Syndrome Functional Score-along with nerve conduction studies (CMAP, SNCV, MNCV), were performed preoperatively and at 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the subcutaneous group, the percutaneous group showed significantly greater improvement in VAS scores (VAS: -2.75 vs. -1.99, p < 0.001), PRUNE scores (PRUNE: -23.78 vs. -17.64, p < 0.001), and functional scores (Score: +3.58 vs. + 2.70, p = 0.0004). Increases in SNCV (16.45 m/s vs. 14.51 m/s, p = 0.035) and MNCV (18.55 m/s vs. 12.13 m/s, p < 0.001) were also more pronounced in the percutaneous group. Although CMAP improved in both groups, postoperative CMAP values were slightly higher in the subcutaneous group (6.02 ± 0.85 mV vs. 5.40 ± 0.51 mV, p = 0.002). No infections or wound complications occurred in either group; two reoperations for recurrent compression were required in the subcutaneous group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Percutaneous external suturing may represent a safe and promising alternative for fascial flap fixation during CuTS surgery, with potential benefits in early postoperative pain relief, nerve conduction, and functional outcomes. However, longer-term studies are needed to assess durability and potential late complications.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was retrospectively registered with the Institutional Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (Approval No. PJ2024-12-17).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"792\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374454/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-06200-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-06200-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Short-term outcomes of percutaneous versus subcutaneous fascial flap fixation in cubital tunnel syndrome surgery: A retrospective cohort study.
Objective: Percutaneous external suturing has been proposed as an alternative approach to fascial flap fixation during anterior subcutaneous transposition for cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS), with the aim of minimizing deep tissue disruption and reducing postoperative complications. This study compared short-term outcomes between percutaneous external fixation and traditional subcutaneous fixation of fascial flaps in CuTS surgery.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 114 patients who underwent anterior ulnar nerve transposition with fascial flap coverage were enrolled between January 2020 and December 2023. Patients were grouped based on the method of fascial flap fixation: subcutaneous (n = 57) or percutaneous (n = 57). Clinical assessments-including Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation (PRUNE), and Cubital Tunnel Syndrome Functional Score-along with nerve conduction studies (CMAP, SNCV, MNCV), were performed preoperatively and at 6-month follow-up.
Results: Compared to the subcutaneous group, the percutaneous group showed significantly greater improvement in VAS scores (VAS: -2.75 vs. -1.99, p < 0.001), PRUNE scores (PRUNE: -23.78 vs. -17.64, p < 0.001), and functional scores (Score: +3.58 vs. + 2.70, p = 0.0004). Increases in SNCV (16.45 m/s vs. 14.51 m/s, p = 0.035) and MNCV (18.55 m/s vs. 12.13 m/s, p < 0.001) were also more pronounced in the percutaneous group. Although CMAP improved in both groups, postoperative CMAP values were slightly higher in the subcutaneous group (6.02 ± 0.85 mV vs. 5.40 ± 0.51 mV, p = 0.002). No infections or wound complications occurred in either group; two reoperations for recurrent compression were required in the subcutaneous group.
Conclusion: Percutaneous external suturing may represent a safe and promising alternative for fascial flap fixation during CuTS surgery, with potential benefits in early postoperative pain relief, nerve conduction, and functional outcomes. However, longer-term studies are needed to assess durability and potential late complications.
Trial registration: This study was retrospectively registered with the Institutional Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (Approval No. PJ2024-12-17).
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues.
Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications.
JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.