{"title":"有或没有槟榔果的无烟烟草使用者口腔潜在恶性疾病患病率:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Gowri Sivaramakrishnan, Kannan Sridharan","doi":"10.1111/jop.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smokeless tobacco (SLT) use is a major global risk factor for oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs). However, the differential impact of SLT product composition, particularly tobacco-only versus combined tobacco-areca nut products, on OPMD prevalence remains inadequately characterized.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the pooled prevalence of OPMDs between users of tobacco-only SLT and users of SLT containing both tobacco and areca nut.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases (PUBMED, Cochrane, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science) were searched until December 15, 2024. Included studies reported OPMD prevalence among current SLT users with a clear product description. Areca nut-only products were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality (Newcastle-Ottawa scale). Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using random-effects models in R software due to anticipated heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis (leave-one-out) was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three studies (62 680 SLT users: 5058 tobacco-only; 57 622 tobacco-areca nut) were included. Overall OPMD prevalence was significantly higher among SLT with areca nut users (16.3%, 95% CI) compared to tobacco-only SLT users (10.4%, 95% CI). Tobacco-areca nut use showed markedly high prevalence of oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) (33%) and dysplasia (16%), especially in endemic regions like India (88.8% OPMD prevalence in this subgroup). Tobacco-only SLT use was predominantly associated with leukoplakia (18%) and lichen planus/lichenoid reactions (15%). A critical limitation was the high proportion of non-specific OPMD diagnoses (27% overall, 38% in tobacco-areca nut users), hindering precise estimates of specific conditions. Sensitivity analyses confirmed result robustness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrates a substantial global burden of OPMDs among SLT users, with distinct risk profiles driven by product composition. Tobacco-areca nut SLT poses the highest risk (especially for OSMF and dysplasia), while tobacco-only SLT remains a significant independent risk factor (primarily for leukoplakia and lichenoid reaction). The high prevalence, particularly with combined products in regions like South Asia, underscores the urgent need for targeted public health interventions. Future research must prioritize precise product classification and standardized OPMD diagnosis to improve risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16588,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders in Smokeless Tobacco Users With or Without Areca Nut: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Gowri Sivaramakrishnan, Kannan Sridharan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jop.70045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smokeless tobacco (SLT) use is a major global risk factor for oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs). However, the differential impact of SLT product composition, particularly tobacco-only versus combined tobacco-areca nut products, on OPMD prevalence remains inadequately characterized.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the pooled prevalence of OPMDs between users of tobacco-only SLT and users of SLT containing both tobacco and areca nut.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases (PUBMED, Cochrane, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science) were searched until December 15, 2024. Included studies reported OPMD prevalence among current SLT users with a clear product description. Areca nut-only products were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality (Newcastle-Ottawa scale). Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using random-effects models in R software due to anticipated heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis (leave-one-out) was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three studies (62 680 SLT users: 5058 tobacco-only; 57 622 tobacco-areca nut) were included. Overall OPMD prevalence was significantly higher among SLT with areca nut users (16.3%, 95% CI) compared to tobacco-only SLT users (10.4%, 95% CI). Tobacco-areca nut use showed markedly high prevalence of oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) (33%) and dysplasia (16%), especially in endemic regions like India (88.8% OPMD prevalence in this subgroup). Tobacco-only SLT use was predominantly associated with leukoplakia (18%) and lichen planus/lichenoid reactions (15%). A critical limitation was the high proportion of non-specific OPMD diagnoses (27% overall, 38% in tobacco-areca nut users), hindering precise estimates of specific conditions. Sensitivity analyses confirmed result robustness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrates a substantial global burden of OPMDs among SLT users, with distinct risk profiles driven by product composition. Tobacco-areca nut SLT poses the highest risk (especially for OSMF and dysplasia), while tobacco-only SLT remains a significant independent risk factor (primarily for leukoplakia and lichenoid reaction). The high prevalence, particularly with combined products in regions like South Asia, underscores the urgent need for targeted public health interventions. Future research must prioritize precise product classification and standardized OPMD diagnosis to improve risk assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.70045\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.70045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:无烟烟草(SLT)的使用是全球口腔潜在恶性疾病(OPMDs)的主要危险因素。然而,SLT产品成分的差异影响,特别是仅烟草与联合烟草槟榔果产品,对OPMD患病率的影响仍然没有充分表征。目的:比较纯烟草SLT使用者和含烟叶和槟榔的SLT使用者之间opmd的总患病率。方法:本研究遵循PRISMA指南进行。电子数据库(PUBMED, Cochrane, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science)检索到2024年12月15日。纳入的研究报告了当前SLT使用者中OPMD的患病率,并有明确的产品描述。仅含槟榔果的产品被排除在外。两名评论者独立筛选研究,提取数据并评估质量(纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表)。由于预期的异质性,在R软件中使用随机效应模型计算合并患病率估计值。进行敏感性分析(留一)。结果:纳入了33项研究(62680名SLT使用者,5058名纯烟草使用者,57622名槟榔果烟草使用者)。与仅吸烟的SLT使用者(10.4%,95% CI)相比,服用槟榔果的SLT使用者的总体OPMD患病率显著更高(16.3%,95% CI)。烟草槟榔果的使用显示出口腔黏膜下纤维化(OSMF)(33%)和发育不良(16%)的显著高患病率,特别是在印度等流行地区(该亚组中OPMD患病率为88.8%)。仅使用烟草SLT主要与白斑(18%)和扁平苔藓/类苔藓反应(15%)相关。一个关键的限制是非特异性OPMD诊断的比例很高(总体27%,烟草槟榔果使用者38%),阻碍了对特定疾病的精确估计。敏感性分析证实了结果的稳健性。结论:该荟萃分析表明,SLT使用者中opmd的全球负担很大,产品成分驱动的风险概况不同。槟榔果的SLT风险最高(尤其是对OSMF和发育不良),而仅烟草的SLT仍然是一个重要的独立风险因素(主要是白斑和类地衣反应)。这种高流行率,特别是在南亚等地区使用联合产品的情况下,突出表明迫切需要采取有针对性的公共卫生干预措施。未来的研究必须优先考虑精确的产品分类和标准化的OPMD诊断,以提高风险评估。
Prevalence of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders in Smokeless Tobacco Users With or Without Areca Nut: A Meta-Analysis.
Background: Smokeless tobacco (SLT) use is a major global risk factor for oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs). However, the differential impact of SLT product composition, particularly tobacco-only versus combined tobacco-areca nut products, on OPMD prevalence remains inadequately characterized.
Objective: To compare the pooled prevalence of OPMDs between users of tobacco-only SLT and users of SLT containing both tobacco and areca nut.
Methods: This study was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases (PUBMED, Cochrane, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science) were searched until December 15, 2024. Included studies reported OPMD prevalence among current SLT users with a clear product description. Areca nut-only products were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality (Newcastle-Ottawa scale). Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using random-effects models in R software due to anticipated heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis (leave-one-out) was performed.
Results: Thirty-three studies (62 680 SLT users: 5058 tobacco-only; 57 622 tobacco-areca nut) were included. Overall OPMD prevalence was significantly higher among SLT with areca nut users (16.3%, 95% CI) compared to tobacco-only SLT users (10.4%, 95% CI). Tobacco-areca nut use showed markedly high prevalence of oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) (33%) and dysplasia (16%), especially in endemic regions like India (88.8% OPMD prevalence in this subgroup). Tobacco-only SLT use was predominantly associated with leukoplakia (18%) and lichen planus/lichenoid reactions (15%). A critical limitation was the high proportion of non-specific OPMD diagnoses (27% overall, 38% in tobacco-areca nut users), hindering precise estimates of specific conditions. Sensitivity analyses confirmed result robustness.
Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates a substantial global burden of OPMDs among SLT users, with distinct risk profiles driven by product composition. Tobacco-areca nut SLT poses the highest risk (especially for OSMF and dysplasia), while tobacco-only SLT remains a significant independent risk factor (primarily for leukoplakia and lichenoid reaction). The high prevalence, particularly with combined products in regions like South Asia, underscores the urgent need for targeted public health interventions. Future research must prioritize precise product classification and standardized OPMD diagnosis to improve risk assessment.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine is to publish manuscripts of high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work in oral pathology and oral medicine. Papers advancing the science or practice of these disciplines will be welcomed, especially those which bring new knowledge and observations from the application of techniques within the spheres of light and electron microscopy, tissue and organ culture, immunology, histochemistry and immunocytochemistry, microbiology, genetics and biochemistry.