宫颈功能不全妇女行预防性环扎术的早产率和危险因素:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI:10.1080/01443615.2025.2549996
Jing Wang, Hui-Juan Rong, Xiao-Mei Wang, Guo-Yuan Shi, Wen-Hui Song
{"title":"宫颈功能不全妇女行预防性环扎术的早产率和危险因素:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Jing Wang, Hui-Juan Rong, Xiao-Mei Wang, Guo-Yuan Shi, Wen-Hui Song","doi":"10.1080/01443615.2025.2549996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal mortality and long-term health complications. Cervical cerclage (CC) represents a critical intervention for extending pregnancy duration and enhancing neonatal survival in patients diagnosed with cervical insufficiency. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for preterm birth through a meta-analysis comparing outcomes between preterm and full-term deliveries following non-emergency CC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science (WOS), and Scopus were searched to identify studies fulfilling predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria on 31 March 2025. The primary outcome measure was the preterm birth rate, which was calculated as the proportion of preterm birth cases in the total sample size. The impact of various risk factors on preterm birth was further analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 45 studies were included, and the meta-analysis revealed that the aggregate preterm birth rate at 37 weeks was approximately 48.09% following CC. Compared with twin pregnancies, singleton pregnancies were associated with a lower risk of preterm birth (odds ratio [OR]: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.55-0.91; <i>p</i> = 0.008). Among surgery-related factors, CC indicated by physical examination poses a greater risk. Short cervical length prior to CC and elevated inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), were significantly associated with preterm birth (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.66-0.95; <i>p</i> = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified critical risk factors for preterm birth following CC, including physical examination indications, a cervical length ≤ 1.5 cm, cervical dilatation, and CRP abnormalities. These findings are instrumental in identifying high-risk individuals and guiding effective medical resource allocation. However, due to study limitations, large-scale studies with multiple PTB cut-off timepoints and comprehensive analyses of risk factors are necessary to refine preventive and therapeutic approaches for preterm birth.</p>","PeriodicalId":16627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"45 1","pages":"2549996"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preterm birth rates and risk factors among women with cervical incompetence undergoing prophylactic cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jing Wang, Hui-Juan Rong, Xiao-Mei Wang, Guo-Yuan Shi, Wen-Hui Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01443615.2025.2549996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal mortality and long-term health complications. Cervical cerclage (CC) represents a critical intervention for extending pregnancy duration and enhancing neonatal survival in patients diagnosed with cervical insufficiency. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for preterm birth through a meta-analysis comparing outcomes between preterm and full-term deliveries following non-emergency CC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science (WOS), and Scopus were searched to identify studies fulfilling predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria on 31 March 2025. The primary outcome measure was the preterm birth rate, which was calculated as the proportion of preterm birth cases in the total sample size. The impact of various risk factors on preterm birth was further analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 45 studies were included, and the meta-analysis revealed that the aggregate preterm birth rate at 37 weeks was approximately 48.09% following CC. Compared with twin pregnancies, singleton pregnancies were associated with a lower risk of preterm birth (odds ratio [OR]: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.55-0.91; <i>p</i> = 0.008). Among surgery-related factors, CC indicated by physical examination poses a greater risk. Short cervical length prior to CC and elevated inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), were significantly associated with preterm birth (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.66-0.95; <i>p</i> = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified critical risk factors for preterm birth following CC, including physical examination indications, a cervical length ≤ 1.5 cm, cervical dilatation, and CRP abnormalities. These findings are instrumental in identifying high-risk individuals and guiding effective medical resource allocation. However, due to study limitations, large-scale studies with multiple PTB cut-off timepoints and comprehensive analyses of risk factors are necessary to refine preventive and therapeutic approaches for preterm birth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"2549996\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2025.2549996\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2025.2549996","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早产是新生儿死亡和长期健康并发症的主要原因。宫颈环切术(CC)是延长妊娠期和提高宫颈功能不全患者新生儿存活率的关键干预措施。本研究的目的是通过荟萃分析,比较非急诊cc后早产和足月分娩的结果,以确定早产的危险因素。方法:检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science (WOS)和Scopus,以确定2025年3月31日符合预定纳入和排除标准的研究。主要结局指标是早产率,以早产病例占总样本量的比例计算。进一步分析各种危险因素对早产的影响。结果:共纳入45项研究,荟萃分析显示,CC后37周的总早产率约为48.09%,与双胎妊娠相比,单胎妊娠的早产风险较低(优势比[OR]: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.55-0.91; p = 0.008)。在手术相关因素中,体格检查显示的CC风险较大。CC前宫颈长度短和炎症标志物(如c反应蛋白(CRP))升高与早产显著相关(OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.66-0.95; p = 0.011)。结论:本研究确定了CC后早产的关键危险因素,包括体格检查指征、宫颈长度≤1.5 cm、宫颈扩张和CRP异常。这些发现有助于识别高危人群,指导有效的医疗资源配置。然而,由于研究的局限性,有必要进行具有多个PTB截止时间点的大规模研究,并对危险因素进行全面分析,以完善早产的预防和治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preterm birth rates and risk factors among women with cervical incompetence undergoing prophylactic cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal mortality and long-term health complications. Cervical cerclage (CC) represents a critical intervention for extending pregnancy duration and enhancing neonatal survival in patients diagnosed with cervical insufficiency. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for preterm birth through a meta-analysis comparing outcomes between preterm and full-term deliveries following non-emergency CC.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science (WOS), and Scopus were searched to identify studies fulfilling predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria on 31 March 2025. The primary outcome measure was the preterm birth rate, which was calculated as the proportion of preterm birth cases in the total sample size. The impact of various risk factors on preterm birth was further analysed.

Results: A total of 45 studies were included, and the meta-analysis revealed that the aggregate preterm birth rate at 37 weeks was approximately 48.09% following CC. Compared with twin pregnancies, singleton pregnancies were associated with a lower risk of preterm birth (odds ratio [OR]: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.55-0.91; p = 0.008). Among surgery-related factors, CC indicated by physical examination poses a greater risk. Short cervical length prior to CC and elevated inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), were significantly associated with preterm birth (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.66-0.95; p = 0.011).

Conclusions: This study identified critical risk factors for preterm birth following CC, including physical examination indications, a cervical length ≤ 1.5 cm, cervical dilatation, and CRP abnormalities. These findings are instrumental in identifying high-risk individuals and guiding effective medical resource allocation. However, due to study limitations, large-scale studies with multiple PTB cut-off timepoints and comprehensive analyses of risk factors are necessary to refine preventive and therapeutic approaches for preterm birth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
398
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology represents an established forum for the entire field of obstetrics and gynaecology, publishing a broad range of original, peer-reviewed papers, from scientific and clinical research to reviews relevant to practice. It also includes occasional supplements on clinical symposia. The journal is read widely by trainees in our specialty and we acknowledge a major role in education in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Past and present editors have recognized the difficulties that junior doctors encounter in achieving their first publications and spend time advising authors during their initial attempts at submission. The journal continues to attract a world-wide readership thanks to the emphasis on practical applicability and its excellent record of drawing on an international base of authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信