{"title":"与肌肉减少症相比,虚弱是老年血液透析患者死亡率的预测因子。","authors":"Moatasem Ghoneim, Andrew Davenport","doi":"10.1007/s40620-025-02368-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemodialysis (HD) patients are at an increased risk of sarcopenia and related mortality. As the number of elderly patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing HD continues to grow, the prevalence of frailty also rises. This study aims to assess whether frailty or sarcopenia constitutes a greater risk to patient survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center cohort of HD patients was followed for four years. Clinical frailty scores and body composition, assessed using multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis, were utilized to evaluate survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 173 HD patients, mean age 64.7 ± 15.6 years, 102 (58.9%) male, 31 (17.9%) diabetic, 66 (38.1%) were sarcopenic, and 132 (76.3%) were frail. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant differences in survival between patients categorized as non-obese and non-sarcopenic, obese and non-sarcopenic, non-obese and sarcopenic, or obese and sarcopenic. However, frail patients showed significantly higher mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified frailty as an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-3.6, p = 0.004), while sarcopenia was not statistically significant (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.83-1.25, p = 0.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frailty, rather than sarcopenia, was associated with mortality in HD patients. While multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis requires specialized equipment, clinical frailty scores offer a rapid and cost-effective screening tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":16542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frailty compared to sarcopenia as the predictor of mortality for elderly hemodialysis patients.\",\"authors\":\"Moatasem Ghoneim, Andrew Davenport\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40620-025-02368-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemodialysis (HD) patients are at an increased risk of sarcopenia and related mortality. As the number of elderly patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing HD continues to grow, the prevalence of frailty also rises. This study aims to assess whether frailty or sarcopenia constitutes a greater risk to patient survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center cohort of HD patients was followed for four years. Clinical frailty scores and body composition, assessed using multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis, were utilized to evaluate survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 173 HD patients, mean age 64.7 ± 15.6 years, 102 (58.9%) male, 31 (17.9%) diabetic, 66 (38.1%) were sarcopenic, and 132 (76.3%) were frail. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant differences in survival between patients categorized as non-obese and non-sarcopenic, obese and non-sarcopenic, non-obese and sarcopenic, or obese and sarcopenic. However, frail patients showed significantly higher mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified frailty as an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-3.6, p = 0.004), while sarcopenia was not statistically significant (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.83-1.25, p = 0.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frailty, rather than sarcopenia, was associated with mortality in HD patients. While multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis requires specialized equipment, clinical frailty scores offer a rapid and cost-effective screening tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-025-02368-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-025-02368-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:血液透析(HD)患者发生肌肉减少症和相关死亡的风险增加。随着老年慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者发生HD的人数不断增加,虚弱的患病率也在上升。本研究旨在评估虚弱或肌肉减少症是否对患者生存构成更大的风险。方法:对HD患者进行为期4年的单中心随访。临床虚弱评分和身体组成,采用多频生物电阻抗分析评估,用于评估生存结果。结果:173例HD患者平均年龄64.7±15.6岁,男性102例(58.9%),糖尿病31例(17.9%),肌肉减少66例(38.1%),体弱132例(76.3%)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,非肥胖和非肌肉减少症、肥胖和非肌肉减少症、非肥胖和肌肉减少症、肥胖和肌肉减少症患者的生存率无显著差异。然而,体弱患者的死亡率明显更高。多变量logistic回归分析发现,虚弱是死亡率的独立预测因子(风险比[HR] 2.1, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.2-3.6, p = 0.004),而肌肉减少症无统计学意义(风险比1.01,95% CI 0.83-1.25, p = 0.86)。结论:与HD患者的死亡率相关的是虚弱,而不是肌肉减少症。虽然多频生物电阻抗分析需要专门的设备,但临床虚弱评分提供了一种快速且具有成本效益的筛查工具。
Frailty compared to sarcopenia as the predictor of mortality for elderly hemodialysis patients.
Background: Hemodialysis (HD) patients are at an increased risk of sarcopenia and related mortality. As the number of elderly patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing HD continues to grow, the prevalence of frailty also rises. This study aims to assess whether frailty or sarcopenia constitutes a greater risk to patient survival.
Methods: A single-center cohort of HD patients was followed for four years. Clinical frailty scores and body composition, assessed using multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis, were utilized to evaluate survival outcomes.
Results: Among 173 HD patients, mean age 64.7 ± 15.6 years, 102 (58.9%) male, 31 (17.9%) diabetic, 66 (38.1%) were sarcopenic, and 132 (76.3%) were frail. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant differences in survival between patients categorized as non-obese and non-sarcopenic, obese and non-sarcopenic, non-obese and sarcopenic, or obese and sarcopenic. However, frail patients showed significantly higher mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified frailty as an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-3.6, p = 0.004), while sarcopenia was not statistically significant (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.83-1.25, p = 0.86).
Conclusion: Frailty, rather than sarcopenia, was associated with mortality in HD patients. While multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis requires specialized equipment, clinical frailty scores offer a rapid and cost-effective screening tool.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Nephrology is a bimonthly journal that considers publication of peer reviewed original manuscripts dealing with both clinical and laboratory investigations of relevance to the broad fields of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation. It is the Official Journal of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN).