神经眼科转诊模式:哥伦比亚的经验。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sohum Sheth, Lina Ramirez-Sanchez, Juliana Vanessa Rincón-Lopez, Alvaro J Mejia-Vergara
{"title":"神经眼科转诊模式:哥伦比亚的经验。","authors":"Sohum Sheth, Lina Ramirez-Sanchez, Juliana Vanessa Rincón-Lopez, Alvaro J Mejia-Vergara","doi":"10.1097/WNO.0000000000002377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a global shortage of neuro-ophthalmologists, driven by an aging workforce and declining interest among residents. Emerging data indicate that this supply-demand mismatch results in prolonged patient wait times, leading to evaluation by additional physicians, delayed/incorrect diagnosis, and postponed therapy. However, data on referral patterns are primarily from resource-rich countries. This study examines referral patterns for a neuro-ophthalmology clinic in Bogota, Colombia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review analyzed patients referred to the clinic between July 2020 and July 2021. Data included demographics, time from symptom onset to neuro-ophthalmology appointment (NOA), referral-to-NOA time, initial specialty consulted, number of providers seen before NOA, diagnostic tests performed, and diagnoses at referral vs after NOA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 535 patients (62.1% female), the median wait from symptom onset to NOA was 365 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 60-500) and 30 days ([IQR: 10-45]) from referral to NOA. Most patients (80.2%) first saw an ophthalmologist, with a mean of 1.1 providers seen before NOA. Common diagnostic tests before NOA included brain MRIs (28.6%), posterior segment optical coherence tomography (24.3%), and visual fields (22.8%). Three hundred twenty-six (63.9%) of patients were either partially or completely misdiagnosed before NOA. Time from symptom onset to NOA was a predictor for fully correct diagnosis by referring provider (P < 0.01), with a shorter time corresponding to a greater likelihood of partially correct diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Referral delays are frequent, and misdiagnoses before neuro-ophthalmology consultations are common. Enhancing timely access to NOA could significantly improve patient outcomes and reduce unnecessary utilization of health care resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":16485,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuro-Ophthalmology Referral Patterns: Learnings From Colombia.\",\"authors\":\"Sohum Sheth, Lina Ramirez-Sanchez, Juliana Vanessa Rincón-Lopez, Alvaro J Mejia-Vergara\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNO.0000000000002377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a global shortage of neuro-ophthalmologists, driven by an aging workforce and declining interest among residents. Emerging data indicate that this supply-demand mismatch results in prolonged patient wait times, leading to evaluation by additional physicians, delayed/incorrect diagnosis, and postponed therapy. However, data on referral patterns are primarily from resource-rich countries. This study examines referral patterns for a neuro-ophthalmology clinic in Bogota, Colombia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review analyzed patients referred to the clinic between July 2020 and July 2021. Data included demographics, time from symptom onset to neuro-ophthalmology appointment (NOA), referral-to-NOA time, initial specialty consulted, number of providers seen before NOA, diagnostic tests performed, and diagnoses at referral vs after NOA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 535 patients (62.1% female), the median wait from symptom onset to NOA was 365 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 60-500) and 30 days ([IQR: 10-45]) from referral to NOA. Most patients (80.2%) first saw an ophthalmologist, with a mean of 1.1 providers seen before NOA. Common diagnostic tests before NOA included brain MRIs (28.6%), posterior segment optical coherence tomography (24.3%), and visual fields (22.8%). Three hundred twenty-six (63.9%) of patients were either partially or completely misdiagnosed before NOA. Time from symptom onset to NOA was a predictor for fully correct diagnosis by referring provider (P < 0.01), with a shorter time corresponding to a greater likelihood of partially correct diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Referral delays are frequent, and misdiagnoses before neuro-ophthalmology consultations are common. Enhancing timely access to NOA could significantly improve patient outcomes and reduce unnecessary utilization of health care resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000002377\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000002377","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于劳动力老龄化和居民兴趣下降,全球神经眼科医生短缺。新出现的数据表明,这种供需不匹配导致患者等待时间延长,导致额外的医生评估,延迟/不正确的诊断和延迟治疗。然而,关于转诊模式的数据主要来自资源丰富的国家。本研究考察了哥伦比亚波哥大一家神经眼科诊所的转诊模式。方法:回顾性分析2020年7月至2021年7月间就诊的患者。数据包括人口统计、从症状出现到神经眼科预约(NOA)的时间、转诊到NOA的时间、最初的专科咨询、NOA前就诊的医生数量、进行的诊断测试以及转诊时与NOA后的诊断。结果:535例患者中(62.1%为女性),从症状出现到NOA的中位等待时间为365天(四分位数间距[IQR]: 60-500),从转诊到NOA的中位等待时间为30天([IQR: 10-45])。大多数患者(80.2%)首先看的是眼科医生,在NOA之前平均见过1.1名眼科医生。NOA前常见的诊断检查包括脑mri(28.6%)、后段光学相干断层扫描(24.3%)和视野(22.8%)。326例(63.9%)患者在NOA前被部分或完全误诊。从症状出现到NOA的时间是转诊医师完全正确诊断的预测因子(P < 0.01),时间越短,部分正确诊断的可能性越大。结论:转诊延误是常见的,误诊前神经眼科会诊是常见的。加强及时获得NOA可显著改善患者预后并减少不必要的卫生保健资源利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuro-Ophthalmology Referral Patterns: Learnings From Colombia.

Background: There is a global shortage of neuro-ophthalmologists, driven by an aging workforce and declining interest among residents. Emerging data indicate that this supply-demand mismatch results in prolonged patient wait times, leading to evaluation by additional physicians, delayed/incorrect diagnosis, and postponed therapy. However, data on referral patterns are primarily from resource-rich countries. This study examines referral patterns for a neuro-ophthalmology clinic in Bogota, Colombia.

Methods: A retrospective chart review analyzed patients referred to the clinic between July 2020 and July 2021. Data included demographics, time from symptom onset to neuro-ophthalmology appointment (NOA), referral-to-NOA time, initial specialty consulted, number of providers seen before NOA, diagnostic tests performed, and diagnoses at referral vs after NOA.

Results: Among 535 patients (62.1% female), the median wait from symptom onset to NOA was 365 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 60-500) and 30 days ([IQR: 10-45]) from referral to NOA. Most patients (80.2%) first saw an ophthalmologist, with a mean of 1.1 providers seen before NOA. Common diagnostic tests before NOA included brain MRIs (28.6%), posterior segment optical coherence tomography (24.3%), and visual fields (22.8%). Three hundred twenty-six (63.9%) of patients were either partially or completely misdiagnosed before NOA. Time from symptom onset to NOA was a predictor for fully correct diagnosis by referring provider (P < 0.01), with a shorter time corresponding to a greater likelihood of partially correct diagnosis.

Conclusions: Referral delays are frequent, and misdiagnoses before neuro-ophthalmology consultations are common. Enhancing timely access to NOA could significantly improve patient outcomes and reduce unnecessary utilization of health care resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology
Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.80%
发文量
593
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology (JNO) is the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society (NANOS). It is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original and commissioned articles related to neuro-ophthalmology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信