优化尿白蛋白-肌酐比测试和转诊途径慢性肾脏疾病:意大利专家的名义组技术共识研究。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Irene Capelli, Michele De Benedictis, Andrea Di Lenarda, Vittorio Di Maso, Paolo Fabbrini, Paola Galli, Carlo Garofalo, Antonio Maria Leone, Maria Ida Maiorino, Marita Marengo, Sara Pasqualetti, Francesco Pesce, Alberto Polimeni, Michele Provenzano, Danilo Ribichini
{"title":"优化尿白蛋白-肌酐比测试和转诊途径慢性肾脏疾病:意大利专家的名义组技术共识研究。","authors":"Irene Capelli, Michele De Benedictis, Andrea Di Lenarda, Vittorio Di Maso, Paolo Fabbrini, Paola Galli, Carlo Garofalo, Antonio Maria Leone, Maria Ida Maiorino, Marita Marengo, Sara Pasqualetti, Francesco Pesce, Alberto Polimeni, Michele Provenzano, Danilo Ribichini","doi":"10.1007/s40620-025-02371-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic kidney disease (CKD) represents a major global health burden, often diagnosed at advanced stages when treatment is less effective. Albuminuria, assessed by the urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR), is a key biomarker for CKD detection and risk stratification. Despite guideline recommendations, adherence to uACR testing remains low, limiting early diagnosis and timely referral. The ALLIANCE project aimed to develop a multidisciplinary consensus on optimizing uACR testing and referral pathways for improved CKD management in at-risk populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified nominal group technique was used to achieve expert consensus. Seven nephrologists and eight specialists in other disciplines  (cardiologists, endocrinologists, diabetologists, and a clinical biochemist) participated in structured discussions and ranked statements across three domains: (1) at-risk population definition, (2) barriers to uACR testing, and (3) CKD management and referral. Relevance rankings were analyzed using hierarchical clustering.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven consensus statements were developed, eight of which were deemed highly relevant. Key recommendations included expanding CKD risk awareness to encompass obesity and family history, enhancing clinician education, and improving coordination between nephrologists and other specialists. Early nephrology referral was emphasized for patients with marked albuminuria, rapid renal decline, or specific risk factors. Integration of digital health tools, including shared electronic health records, was advised to support coordinated care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ALLIANCE project identified critical gaps in CKD detection and management. Addressing these through clinician education, standardized uACR testing protocols, and multidisciplinary collaboration may improve outcomes and reduce cardiorenal risk. Implementation of these consensus recommendations could facilitate earlier diagnosis and better management of high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio testing and referral pathways for chronic kidney disease: a nominal group technique consensus study among Italian experts.\",\"authors\":\"Irene Capelli, Michele De Benedictis, Andrea Di Lenarda, Vittorio Di Maso, Paolo Fabbrini, Paola Galli, Carlo Garofalo, Antonio Maria Leone, Maria Ida Maiorino, Marita Marengo, Sara Pasqualetti, Francesco Pesce, Alberto Polimeni, Michele Provenzano, Danilo Ribichini\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40620-025-02371-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic kidney disease (CKD) represents a major global health burden, often diagnosed at advanced stages when treatment is less effective. Albuminuria, assessed by the urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR), is a key biomarker for CKD detection and risk stratification. Despite guideline recommendations, adherence to uACR testing remains low, limiting early diagnosis and timely referral. The ALLIANCE project aimed to develop a multidisciplinary consensus on optimizing uACR testing and referral pathways for improved CKD management in at-risk populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified nominal group technique was used to achieve expert consensus. Seven nephrologists and eight specialists in other disciplines  (cardiologists, endocrinologists, diabetologists, and a clinical biochemist) participated in structured discussions and ranked statements across three domains: (1) at-risk population definition, (2) barriers to uACR testing, and (3) CKD management and referral. Relevance rankings were analyzed using hierarchical clustering.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven consensus statements were developed, eight of which were deemed highly relevant. Key recommendations included expanding CKD risk awareness to encompass obesity and family history, enhancing clinician education, and improving coordination between nephrologists and other specialists. Early nephrology referral was emphasized for patients with marked albuminuria, rapid renal decline, or specific risk factors. Integration of digital health tools, including shared electronic health records, was advised to support coordinated care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ALLIANCE project identified critical gaps in CKD detection and management. Addressing these through clinician education, standardized uACR testing protocols, and multidisciplinary collaboration may improve outcomes and reduce cardiorenal risk. Implementation of these consensus recommendations could facilitate earlier diagnosis and better management of high-risk patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-025-02371-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-025-02371-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)是一种主要的全球健康负担,通常在治疗效果较差的晚期才被诊断出来。蛋白尿,通过尿白蛋白与肌酐比值(uACR)来评估,是CKD检测和风险分层的关键生物标志物。尽管有指南建议,但对uACR检测的依从性仍然很低,限制了早期诊断和及时转诊。ALLIANCE项目旨在在优化uACR检测和转诊途径方面达成多学科共识,以改善高危人群的CKD管理。方法:采用改良的名义群法,征求专家意见。七位肾病学家和八位其他学科的专家(心脏病学家、内分泌学家、糖尿病学家和一位临床生物化学家)参与了结构化的讨论,并对三个领域的陈述进行了排名:(1)高危人群的定义,(2)uACR检测的障碍,(3)CKD的管理和转诊。使用层次聚类分析相关排名。结果:制定了27个共识声明,其中8个被认为高度相关。主要建议包括扩大CKD风险意识,将肥胖和家族史纳入其中,加强临床医生教育,改善肾病学家和其他专家之间的协调。对于有明显蛋白尿、肾功能迅速下降或有特定危险因素的患者,强调早期肾内科转诊。建议整合数字卫生工具,包括共享电子卫生记录,以支持协调护理。结论:ALLIANCE项目确定了CKD检测和管理方面的关键差距。通过临床医生教育、标准化的uACR测试方案和多学科合作来解决这些问题,可能会改善结果并降低心肾风险。实施这些共识建议可促进对高危患者的早期诊断和更好的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio testing and referral pathways for chronic kidney disease: a nominal group technique consensus study among Italian experts.

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) represents a major global health burden, often diagnosed at advanced stages when treatment is less effective. Albuminuria, assessed by the urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR), is a key biomarker for CKD detection and risk stratification. Despite guideline recommendations, adherence to uACR testing remains low, limiting early diagnosis and timely referral. The ALLIANCE project aimed to develop a multidisciplinary consensus on optimizing uACR testing and referral pathways for improved CKD management in at-risk populations.

Methods: A modified nominal group technique was used to achieve expert consensus. Seven nephrologists and eight specialists in other disciplines  (cardiologists, endocrinologists, diabetologists, and a clinical biochemist) participated in structured discussions and ranked statements across three domains: (1) at-risk population definition, (2) barriers to uACR testing, and (3) CKD management and referral. Relevance rankings were analyzed using hierarchical clustering.

Results: Twenty-seven consensus statements were developed, eight of which were deemed highly relevant. Key recommendations included expanding CKD risk awareness to encompass obesity and family history, enhancing clinician education, and improving coordination between nephrologists and other specialists. Early nephrology referral was emphasized for patients with marked albuminuria, rapid renal decline, or specific risk factors. Integration of digital health tools, including shared electronic health records, was advised to support coordinated care.

Conclusions: The ALLIANCE project identified critical gaps in CKD detection and management. Addressing these through clinician education, standardized uACR testing protocols, and multidisciplinary collaboration may improve outcomes and reduce cardiorenal risk. Implementation of these consensus recommendations could facilitate earlier diagnosis and better management of high-risk patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nephrology
Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nephrology is a bimonthly journal that considers publication of peer reviewed original manuscripts dealing with both clinical and laboratory investigations of relevance to the broad fields of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation. It is the Official Journal of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信