创新眶骨膜缝合技术用于内窥镜眶内壁重建。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base Pub Date : 2024-10-05 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2413-3051
Teppei Takeda, Scott Hardison, Kazuhiro Omura, Yudo Ishii, Ryosuke Mori, Adam J Kimple, Brent A Senior, Nobuyoshi Otori, Christine Klatt-Cromwell, Brian D Thorp
{"title":"创新眶骨膜缝合技术用于内窥镜眶内壁重建。","authors":"Teppei Takeda, Scott Hardison, Kazuhiro Omura, Yudo Ishii, Ryosuke Mori, Adam J Kimple, Brent A Senior, Nobuyoshi Otori, Christine Klatt-Cromwell, Brian D Thorp","doi":"10.1055/a-2413-3051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in endoscopic orbital surgery have sparked discussion regarding reconstructive procedures for medial orbital wall defects following tumor removal. This study describes an innovative orbital periosteal suturing technique that addresses the functional and aesthetic concerns created by orbital surgery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Comprehensive clinical evaluation of a novel orbital periosteal suturing technique for endoscopic medial orbital wall reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review identified five patients who underwent endoscopic transnasal resection and subsequent orbital periosteal suturing for reconstruction. The surgical approach involved a binostril transseptal technique to create a broad surgical corridor. The postoperative follow-up was 13.4 ± 1.8 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the five patients, the mean age was 47.6 ± 13.0 years and the lesions were predominantly distributed on the left side (60%). Reconstruction time with the orbital periosteal suture procedure averaged 47.2 ± 6.6 minutes, employing four to five stitches. No patients experienced short-term complications such as visual acuity defect, new or exacerbated diplopia, or cranial nerve palsy within 2 weeks, and no long-term complications such as enophthalmos or prolonged diplopia were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Orbital periosteal suturing is an effective and resource-efficient technique for endoscopic reconstruction of the medial orbital wall. Surgeons may consider this method among the available options for orbital reconstruction, representing a novel advancement in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":16513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base","volume":"86 5","pages":"556-561"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovative Orbital Periosteum Suturing Technique for Endoscopic Medial Orbital Wall Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Teppei Takeda, Scott Hardison, Kazuhiro Omura, Yudo Ishii, Ryosuke Mori, Adam J Kimple, Brent A Senior, Nobuyoshi Otori, Christine Klatt-Cromwell, Brian D Thorp\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2413-3051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in endoscopic orbital surgery have sparked discussion regarding reconstructive procedures for medial orbital wall defects following tumor removal. This study describes an innovative orbital periosteal suturing technique that addresses the functional and aesthetic concerns created by orbital surgery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Comprehensive clinical evaluation of a novel orbital periosteal suturing technique for endoscopic medial orbital wall reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review identified five patients who underwent endoscopic transnasal resection and subsequent orbital periosteal suturing for reconstruction. The surgical approach involved a binostril transseptal technique to create a broad surgical corridor. The postoperative follow-up was 13.4 ± 1.8 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the five patients, the mean age was 47.6 ± 13.0 years and the lesions were predominantly distributed on the left side (60%). Reconstruction time with the orbital periosteal suture procedure averaged 47.2 ± 6.6 minutes, employing four to five stitches. No patients experienced short-term complications such as visual acuity defect, new or exacerbated diplopia, or cranial nerve palsy within 2 weeks, and no long-term complications such as enophthalmos or prolonged diplopia were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Orbital periosteal suturing is an effective and resource-efficient technique for endoscopic reconstruction of the medial orbital wall. Surgeons may consider this method among the available options for orbital reconstruction, representing a novel advancement in the field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base\",\"volume\":\"86 5\",\"pages\":\"556-561\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396872/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2413-3051\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2413-3051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内窥镜眶手术的进展引发了对肿瘤切除后内侧眶壁缺损重建方法的讨论。本研究描述了一种创新的眼眶骨膜缝合技术,解决了眼眶手术带来的功能和美学问题。目的:对一种新型眶内膜缝合技术进行内窥镜眶内壁重建的综合临床评价。方法:回顾性分析5例经鼻内镜切除和眶骨膜缝合重建的患者。手术入路包括双鼻孔经间隔技术,以创造一个广阔的手术通道。术后随访13.4±1.8个月。结果:5例患者平均年龄47.6±13.0岁,病变主要分布于左侧(60%)。眶骨膜缝合重建时间平均为47.2±6.6分钟,共缝4 ~ 5针。2周内无患者出现视力缺损、新发或加重复视、脑神经麻痹等短期并发症,无眼内陷、延长复视等长期并发症。结论:眶内膜缝合是一种有效的内窥镜眶内壁重建技术。外科医生可能会考虑使用这种方法进行眼眶重建,这是该领域的一项新进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Innovative Orbital Periosteum Suturing Technique for Endoscopic Medial Orbital Wall Reconstruction.

Background: Advances in endoscopic orbital surgery have sparked discussion regarding reconstructive procedures for medial orbital wall defects following tumor removal. This study describes an innovative orbital periosteal suturing technique that addresses the functional and aesthetic concerns created by orbital surgery.

Objective: Comprehensive clinical evaluation of a novel orbital periosteal suturing technique for endoscopic medial orbital wall reconstruction.

Methods: A retrospective chart review identified five patients who underwent endoscopic transnasal resection and subsequent orbital periosteal suturing for reconstruction. The surgical approach involved a binostril transseptal technique to create a broad surgical corridor. The postoperative follow-up was 13.4 ± 1.8 months.

Results: In the five patients, the mean age was 47.6 ± 13.0 years and the lesions were predominantly distributed on the left side (60%). Reconstruction time with the orbital periosteal suture procedure averaged 47.2 ± 6.6 minutes, employing four to five stitches. No patients experienced short-term complications such as visual acuity defect, new or exacerbated diplopia, or cranial nerve palsy within 2 weeks, and no long-term complications such as enophthalmos or prolonged diplopia were observed.

Conclusion: Orbital periosteal suturing is an effective and resource-efficient technique for endoscopic reconstruction of the medial orbital wall. Surgeons may consider this method among the available options for orbital reconstruction, representing a novel advancement in the field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
516
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base (JNLS B) is a major publication from the world''s leading publisher in neurosurgery. JNLS B currently serves as the official organ of several national and international neurosurgery and skull base societies. JNLS B is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles, and technical notes covering all aspects of neurological surgery. The focus of JNLS B includes microsurgery as well as the latest minimally invasive techniques, such as stereotactic-guided surgery, endoscopy, and endovascular procedures. JNLS B is devoted to the techniques and procedures of skull base surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信