双侧前庭病变和健康年龄性别匹配参与者的动态视力。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Meichan Zhu, Lisa van Stiphout, Benjamin Volpe, Miranda Janssen, Mustafa Karabulut, Angélica Pérez Fornos, Nils Guinand, Kenneth Meijer, Raymond van de Berg, Christopher McCrum
{"title":"双侧前庭病变和健康年龄性别匹配参与者的动态视力。","authors":"Meichan Zhu, Lisa van Stiphout, Benjamin Volpe, Miranda Janssen, Mustafa Karabulut, Angélica Pérez Fornos, Nils Guinand, Kenneth Meijer, Raymond van de Berg, Christopher McCrum","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13269-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Dynamic visual acuity (DVA) can be assessed on a treadmill while walking at different speeds and is used to assess people with bilateral vestibulopathy (BVP). However, the effects and interactions of age, BVP, and walking speed on DVA loss and assessment dropout are unclear. Our objective was to investigate the effects of BVP, age, and walking speed on DVA loss and assessment dropout in participants with BVP and healthy age-sex-matched participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>41 participants with BVP and 41 age-sex-matched healthy participants completed a treadmill-based DVA assessment, including a static condition at 0 km/h and walking conditions at 2, 4, and 6 km/h. DVA loss was measured as the visual acuity difference between static and walking conditions. The drop-out rate, handrail use, and DVA loss were examined in relation to BVP, age, and walking speed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age significantly increased the odds of dropping out (odds ratio = 1.160, p < 0.001), while BVP did not increase the odds of dropping out (odds ratio = 0.792, p = 0.733). A significant Group*Speed (p = 0.004) interaction effect was found for DVA loss, with DVA loss being significantly worse in people with BVP across all walking speeds, getting progressively worse as speed increased, which was not seen in the healthy participants. Age did not have a significant effect on DVA loss (p = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BVP does not appear to restrict the ability to walk at the higher speeds of a DVA assessment and cause an increase in dropout rate, whereas age does. BVP significantly impacts DVA, with increasing impact at increasing walking speeds.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 9","pages":"603"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12401756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic visual acuity in bilateral vestibulopathy and healthy age-sex-matched participants.\",\"authors\":\"Meichan Zhu, Lisa van Stiphout, Benjamin Volpe, Miranda Janssen, Mustafa Karabulut, Angélica Pérez Fornos, Nils Guinand, Kenneth Meijer, Raymond van de Berg, Christopher McCrum\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00415-025-13269-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Dynamic visual acuity (DVA) can be assessed on a treadmill while walking at different speeds and is used to assess people with bilateral vestibulopathy (BVP). However, the effects and interactions of age, BVP, and walking speed on DVA loss and assessment dropout are unclear. Our objective was to investigate the effects of BVP, age, and walking speed on DVA loss and assessment dropout in participants with BVP and healthy age-sex-matched participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>41 participants with BVP and 41 age-sex-matched healthy participants completed a treadmill-based DVA assessment, including a static condition at 0 km/h and walking conditions at 2, 4, and 6 km/h. DVA loss was measured as the visual acuity difference between static and walking conditions. The drop-out rate, handrail use, and DVA loss were examined in relation to BVP, age, and walking speed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age significantly increased the odds of dropping out (odds ratio = 1.160, p < 0.001), while BVP did not increase the odds of dropping out (odds ratio = 0.792, p = 0.733). A significant Group*Speed (p = 0.004) interaction effect was found for DVA loss, with DVA loss being significantly worse in people with BVP across all walking speeds, getting progressively worse as speed increased, which was not seen in the healthy participants. Age did not have a significant effect on DVA loss (p = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BVP does not appear to restrict the ability to walk at the higher speeds of a DVA assessment and cause an increase in dropout rate, whereas age does. BVP significantly impacts DVA, with increasing impact at increasing walking speeds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"272 9\",\"pages\":\"603\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12401756/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13269-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13269-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:动态视力(DVA)可以在跑步机上以不同的速度行走时进行评估,并用于评估双侧前庭病变(BVP)患者。然而,年龄、BVP和步行速度对DVA损失和评估放弃的影响和相互作用尚不清楚。我们的目的是研究BVP、年龄和步行速度对BVP患者和年龄性别匹配的健康参与者的DVA损失和评估退出的影响。方法:41名BVP参与者和41名年龄性别匹配的健康参与者完成了基于跑步机的DVA评估,包括0 km/h的静态条件和2、4和6 km/h的步行条件。DVA损失测量为静态和步行条件下的视力差异。退出率、扶手使用和DVA损失与BVP、年龄和步行速度的关系进行了检查。结果:年龄显著增加了辍学的几率(优势比= 1.160,p)。结论:在DVA评估中,BVP似乎不会限制以较高速度行走的能力,也不会导致辍学率增加,而年龄则会。BVP对DVA有显著影响,步行速度越快,影响越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dynamic visual acuity in bilateral vestibulopathy and healthy age-sex-matched participants.

Dynamic visual acuity in bilateral vestibulopathy and healthy age-sex-matched participants.

Objectives: Dynamic visual acuity (DVA) can be assessed on a treadmill while walking at different speeds and is used to assess people with bilateral vestibulopathy (BVP). However, the effects and interactions of age, BVP, and walking speed on DVA loss and assessment dropout are unclear. Our objective was to investigate the effects of BVP, age, and walking speed on DVA loss and assessment dropout in participants with BVP and healthy age-sex-matched participants.

Methods: 41 participants with BVP and 41 age-sex-matched healthy participants completed a treadmill-based DVA assessment, including a static condition at 0 km/h and walking conditions at 2, 4, and 6 km/h. DVA loss was measured as the visual acuity difference between static and walking conditions. The drop-out rate, handrail use, and DVA loss were examined in relation to BVP, age, and walking speed.

Results: Age significantly increased the odds of dropping out (odds ratio = 1.160, p < 0.001), while BVP did not increase the odds of dropping out (odds ratio = 0.792, p = 0.733). A significant Group*Speed (p = 0.004) interaction effect was found for DVA loss, with DVA loss being significantly worse in people with BVP across all walking speeds, getting progressively worse as speed increased, which was not seen in the healthy participants. Age did not have a significant effect on DVA loss (p = 0.06).

Conclusion: BVP does not appear to restrict the ability to walk at the higher speeds of a DVA assessment and cause an increase in dropout rate, whereas age does. BVP significantly impacts DVA, with increasing impact at increasing walking speeds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信