比较热量和自我体验头晕症状:功能性头晕的诊断价值和意义。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jörn K Pomper, Saskia Rabe, Uwe Ilg, Stephan Wolpert
{"title":"比较热量和自我体验头晕症状:功能性头晕的诊断价值和意义。","authors":"Jörn K Pomper, Saskia Rabe, Uwe Ilg, Stephan Wolpert","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13334-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The diagnostic value of dizziness symptom quality is limited by variability in patient self-reports. Comparing it to the experience during standardized caloric stimulation could help control for individual differences in dizziness experience and reporting. As a nonphysiological stimulus, caloric testing may serve as a proxy for acute peripheral vestibular disorder. We hypothesized that dizziness of peripheral origin would be perceived as more similar to caloric stimulation than nonperipheral dizziness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with peripheral (n = 49) and nonperipheral dizziness (n = 34) were compared. Using newly developed questionnaires, participants rated the intensity of 30 symptoms during both dizziness and caloric stimulation, compared symptom intensity between the two, and rated overall similarity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Peripheral patients did not perceive caloric stimulation as more similar to their symptoms than nonperipheral patients. This also held for the functional dizziness subgroup (n = 14). However, exploratory analyses suggest symptom-specific group differences based on the directional intensity difference. For example, peripheral patients reported stronger spinning during their dizziness, whereas nonperipheral patients reported stronger spinning during caloric stimulation. These group differences outperformed those based on the dizziness ratings alone, which likely reflects pronounced caloric symptoms in the nonperipheral group, especially in functional dizziness, rather than stable individual differences. Peripheral patients also reported stronger caloric symptoms than controls without dizziness (n = 20). Symptom-specific group differences were not accounted for by slow-phase velocity of caloric nystagmus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the potential diagnostic value of comparing symptoms with caloric stimulation and provides further support for motion perception overestimation in functional dizziness.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 9","pages":"600"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398442/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing caloric and self-experienced dizziness symptoms: diagnostic value and implications in functional dizziness.\",\"authors\":\"Jörn K Pomper, Saskia Rabe, Uwe Ilg, Stephan Wolpert\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00415-025-13334-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The diagnostic value of dizziness symptom quality is limited by variability in patient self-reports. Comparing it to the experience during standardized caloric stimulation could help control for individual differences in dizziness experience and reporting. As a nonphysiological stimulus, caloric testing may serve as a proxy for acute peripheral vestibular disorder. We hypothesized that dizziness of peripheral origin would be perceived as more similar to caloric stimulation than nonperipheral dizziness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with peripheral (n = 49) and nonperipheral dizziness (n = 34) were compared. Using newly developed questionnaires, participants rated the intensity of 30 symptoms during both dizziness and caloric stimulation, compared symptom intensity between the two, and rated overall similarity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Peripheral patients did not perceive caloric stimulation as more similar to their symptoms than nonperipheral patients. This also held for the functional dizziness subgroup (n = 14). However, exploratory analyses suggest symptom-specific group differences based on the directional intensity difference. For example, peripheral patients reported stronger spinning during their dizziness, whereas nonperipheral patients reported stronger spinning during caloric stimulation. These group differences outperformed those based on the dizziness ratings alone, which likely reflects pronounced caloric symptoms in the nonperipheral group, especially in functional dizziness, rather than stable individual differences. Peripheral patients also reported stronger caloric symptoms than controls without dizziness (n = 20). Symptom-specific group differences were not accounted for by slow-phase velocity of caloric nystagmus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the potential diagnostic value of comparing symptoms with caloric stimulation and provides further support for motion perception overestimation in functional dizziness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"272 9\",\"pages\":\"600\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398442/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13334-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13334-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:眩晕症状质量的诊断价值受限于患者自我报告的可变性。将其与标准化热量刺激的体验进行比较,可以帮助控制头晕体验和报告的个体差异。作为一种非生理性刺激,热量测试可以作为急性外周前庭障碍的代理。我们假设外周性眩晕比非外周性头晕更类似于热量刺激。方法:将周围性头晕患者49例与非周围性头晕患者34例进行比较。使用新开发的问卷,参与者对眩晕和热量刺激期间的30种症状的强度进行评分,比较两者之间的症状强度,并对总体相似性进行评分。结果:与非外周患者相比,外周患者并没有感觉到热量刺激与他们的症状更相似。这也适用于功能性头晕亚组(n = 14)。然而,探索性分析提示基于定向强度差异的症状特异性组差异。例如,外周患者在眩晕期间报告了更强的旋转,而非外周患者在热量刺激时报告了更强的旋转。这些组间差异优于仅基于头晕评分的组间差异,后者可能反映了非外周组明显的热量症状,尤其是功能性头晕,而不是稳定的个体差异。外周患者也报告了比对照组更强的热量症状,没有头晕(n = 20)。症状特异性组间差异未被热性眼球震颤的慢相速度所解释。结论:本研究强调了将症状与热刺激进行比较的潜在诊断价值,并为功能性头晕的运动感觉高估提供了进一步的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparing caloric and self-experienced dizziness symptoms: diagnostic value and implications in functional dizziness.

Comparing caloric and self-experienced dizziness symptoms: diagnostic value and implications in functional dizziness.

Comparing caloric and self-experienced dizziness symptoms: diagnostic value and implications in functional dizziness.

Comparing caloric and self-experienced dizziness symptoms: diagnostic value and implications in functional dizziness.

Background: The diagnostic value of dizziness symptom quality is limited by variability in patient self-reports. Comparing it to the experience during standardized caloric stimulation could help control for individual differences in dizziness experience and reporting. As a nonphysiological stimulus, caloric testing may serve as a proxy for acute peripheral vestibular disorder. We hypothesized that dizziness of peripheral origin would be perceived as more similar to caloric stimulation than nonperipheral dizziness.

Methods: Patients with peripheral (n = 49) and nonperipheral dizziness (n = 34) were compared. Using newly developed questionnaires, participants rated the intensity of 30 symptoms during both dizziness and caloric stimulation, compared symptom intensity between the two, and rated overall similarity.

Results: Peripheral patients did not perceive caloric stimulation as more similar to their symptoms than nonperipheral patients. This also held for the functional dizziness subgroup (n = 14). However, exploratory analyses suggest symptom-specific group differences based on the directional intensity difference. For example, peripheral patients reported stronger spinning during their dizziness, whereas nonperipheral patients reported stronger spinning during caloric stimulation. These group differences outperformed those based on the dizziness ratings alone, which likely reflects pronounced caloric symptoms in the nonperipheral group, especially in functional dizziness, rather than stable individual differences. Peripheral patients also reported stronger caloric symptoms than controls without dizziness (n = 20). Symptom-specific group differences were not accounted for by slow-phase velocity of caloric nystagmus.

Conclusions: This study highlights the potential diagnostic value of comparing symptoms with caloric stimulation and provides further support for motion perception overestimation in functional dizziness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信