比较和优化不同裂解缓冲液提取蛋白质的方法,用宏蛋白质组学法分析人粪便微生物组。

IF 1.9 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Shuaixin Gao , Li Chen , Huan Zhang , Amrik Singh Khalsa , Michael T. Bailey , Brett R. Loman , Colleen K. Spees , Jiangjiang Zhu
{"title":"比较和优化不同裂解缓冲液提取蛋白质的方法,用宏蛋白质组学法分析人粪便微生物组。","authors":"Shuaixin Gao ,&nbsp;Li Chen ,&nbsp;Huan Zhang ,&nbsp;Amrik Singh Khalsa ,&nbsp;Michael T. Bailey ,&nbsp;Brett R. Loman ,&nbsp;Colleen K. Spees ,&nbsp;Jiangjiang Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Metaproteomic analysis offers critical insights into gut microbiome function; however, efficient microbial protein extraction from fecal samples remains challenging due to the complexity of different types of bacterial cell walls in the microbiome. In this study, we systematically compared three representative detergent-based lysis buffers (sodium dodecyl sulfate_urea, dodecyl β-D-maltoside_urea, sodium dodecyl sulfate_ dodecyl β-D-maltoside_urea) for metaproteomics sample preparation. After multiple levels of analyses, we identified SDS_DDM_urea as the most efficient option for extracting diverse microbial proteins, peptides, and identifying microbial species. Applying this optimized method to samples from a community based dietary intervention study (Summer Harvest Adventure), we found minimal group-level microbial diversity shifts during this type of intervention, but substantial individual-specific variations reflected by metaproteomics results. Functional analyses also revealed microbial protein changes, especially proteins related to metabolic adaptations, including enhanced carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid biosynthesis, vitamin transport, and increased expression of membrane-associated proteins. Our results highlighted the personalized microbiome response to dietary interventions and underscored the importance of selecting appropriate protein extraction methods to accurately capture microbiome functional dynamics in microbiome analyses via metaproteomics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microbiological methods","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 107244"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing and optimizing protein extraction methods with different lysis buffers for the analyses of human fecal microbiome via metaproteomics approach\",\"authors\":\"Shuaixin Gao ,&nbsp;Li Chen ,&nbsp;Huan Zhang ,&nbsp;Amrik Singh Khalsa ,&nbsp;Michael T. Bailey ,&nbsp;Brett R. Loman ,&nbsp;Colleen K. Spees ,&nbsp;Jiangjiang Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Metaproteomic analysis offers critical insights into gut microbiome function; however, efficient microbial protein extraction from fecal samples remains challenging due to the complexity of different types of bacterial cell walls in the microbiome. In this study, we systematically compared three representative detergent-based lysis buffers (sodium dodecyl sulfate_urea, dodecyl β-D-maltoside_urea, sodium dodecyl sulfate_ dodecyl β-D-maltoside_urea) for metaproteomics sample preparation. After multiple levels of analyses, we identified SDS_DDM_urea as the most efficient option for extracting diverse microbial proteins, peptides, and identifying microbial species. Applying this optimized method to samples from a community based dietary intervention study (Summer Harvest Adventure), we found minimal group-level microbial diversity shifts during this type of intervention, but substantial individual-specific variations reflected by metaproteomics results. Functional analyses also revealed microbial protein changes, especially proteins related to metabolic adaptations, including enhanced carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid biosynthesis, vitamin transport, and increased expression of membrane-associated proteins. Our results highlighted the personalized microbiome response to dietary interventions and underscored the importance of selecting appropriate protein extraction methods to accurately capture microbiome functional dynamics in microbiome analyses via metaproteomics.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of microbiological methods\",\"volume\":\"237 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of microbiological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167701225001605\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microbiological methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167701225001605","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

元蛋白质组学分析提供了对肠道微生物功能的重要见解;然而,由于微生物组中不同类型的细菌细胞壁的复杂性,从粪便样品中有效地提取微生物蛋白仍然具有挑战性。在这项研究中,我们系统地比较了三种具有代表性的基于洗涤剂的裂解缓冲液(十二烷基硫酸脲钠,十二烷基β- d -麦芽糖苷脲,十二烷基硫酸钠十二烷基β- d -麦芽糖苷脲)用于宏蛋白质组学样品的制备。经过多次分析,我们确定SDS_DDM_urea是提取多种微生物蛋白、肽和鉴定微生物物种的最有效选择。将这种优化方法应用于基于社区的饮食干预研究(Summer Harvest Adventure)的样本,我们发现在这种类型的干预中,群体水平的微生物多样性变化很小,但宏蛋白质组学结果反映了大量的个体特异性变化。功能分析还揭示了微生物蛋白的变化,特别是与代谢适应相关的蛋白质,包括碳水化合物代谢增强、氨基酸生物合成、维生素运输和膜相关蛋白表达增加。我们的研究结果强调了个性化的微生物组对饮食干预的反应,并强调了在通过宏蛋白质组学进行微生物组分析时选择合适的蛋白质提取方法来准确捕获微生物组功能动态的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing and optimizing protein extraction methods with different lysis buffers for the analyses of human fecal microbiome via metaproteomics approach
Metaproteomic analysis offers critical insights into gut microbiome function; however, efficient microbial protein extraction from fecal samples remains challenging due to the complexity of different types of bacterial cell walls in the microbiome. In this study, we systematically compared three representative detergent-based lysis buffers (sodium dodecyl sulfate_urea, dodecyl β-D-maltoside_urea, sodium dodecyl sulfate_ dodecyl β-D-maltoside_urea) for metaproteomics sample preparation. After multiple levels of analyses, we identified SDS_DDM_urea as the most efficient option for extracting diverse microbial proteins, peptides, and identifying microbial species. Applying this optimized method to samples from a community based dietary intervention study (Summer Harvest Adventure), we found minimal group-level microbial diversity shifts during this type of intervention, but substantial individual-specific variations reflected by metaproteomics results. Functional analyses also revealed microbial protein changes, especially proteins related to metabolic adaptations, including enhanced carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid biosynthesis, vitamin transport, and increased expression of membrane-associated proteins. Our results highlighted the personalized microbiome response to dietary interventions and underscored the importance of selecting appropriate protein extraction methods to accurately capture microbiome functional dynamics in microbiome analyses via metaproteomics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of microbiological methods
Journal of microbiological methods 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
151
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Microbiological Methods publishes scholarly and original articles, notes and review articles. These articles must include novel and/or state-of-the-art methods, or significant improvements to existing methods. Novel and innovative applications of current methods that are validated and useful will also be published. JMM strives for scholarship, innovation and excellence. This demands scientific rigour, the best available methods and technologies, correctly replicated experiments/tests, the inclusion of proper controls, calibrations, and the correct statistical analysis. The presentation of the data must support the interpretation of the method/approach. All aspects of microbiology are covered, except virology. These include agricultural microbiology, applied and environmental microbiology, bioassays, bioinformatics, biotechnology, biochemical microbiology, clinical microbiology, diagnostics, food monitoring and quality control microbiology, microbial genetics and genomics, geomicrobiology, microbiome methods regardless of habitat, high through-put sequencing methods and analysis, microbial pathogenesis and host responses, metabolomics, metagenomics, metaproteomics, microbial ecology and diversity, microbial physiology, microbial ultra-structure, microscopic and imaging methods, molecular microbiology, mycology, novel mathematical microbiology and modelling, parasitology, plant-microbe interactions, protein markers/profiles, proteomics, pyrosequencing, public health microbiology, radioisotopes applied to microbiology, robotics applied to microbiological methods,rumen microbiology, microbiological methods for space missions and extreme environments, sampling methods and samplers, soil and sediment microbiology, transcriptomics, veterinary microbiology, sero-diagnostics and typing/identification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信