慢性疼痛的跨学科团队评估患者的经验:一项定性访谈研究。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-08-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S526302
Martin Bystad, Ida Solhaug, Ida Pauline Høilo Granheim, Rolf Wynn
{"title":"慢性疼痛的跨学科团队评估患者的经验:一项定性访谈研究。","authors":"Martin Bystad, Ida Solhaug, Ida Pauline Høilo Granheim, Rolf Wynn","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S526302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pain is a widespread issue, and it is important to find interventions that are effective and valued by patients. At the study hospital, an interdisciplinary approach is often used, involving an assessment by a psychologist, physiotherapist, and doctor. We wanted to examine patients' experiences with this interdisciplinary approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with nine patients at the Pain Department at the University Hospital of North Norway. The interviews were conducted in January and February 2023. The interviews were analyzed using a phenomenological approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, our results suggest that an interdisciplinary approach is perceived as beneficial by patients with chronic pain. Four themes were highlighted. The first theme was that patients felt their pain was understood in a holistic manner. The second theme was that the participants felt seen and understood. The third theme emphasized the value of having further actions recommended and initiated. The fourth theme was a feeling of being overwhelmed by an interdisciplinary approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A majority of the participants found an interdisciplinary approach to be helpful. However, some patients may find it challenging to meet the entire interdisciplinary team at once.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"5103-5111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12375322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' Experiences with an Interdisciplinary Team Assessment of Chronic Pain: A Qualitative Interview Study.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Bystad, Ida Solhaug, Ida Pauline Høilo Granheim, Rolf Wynn\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JMDH.S526302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pain is a widespread issue, and it is important to find interventions that are effective and valued by patients. At the study hospital, an interdisciplinary approach is often used, involving an assessment by a psychologist, physiotherapist, and doctor. We wanted to examine patients' experiences with this interdisciplinary approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with nine patients at the Pain Department at the University Hospital of North Norway. The interviews were conducted in January and February 2023. The interviews were analyzed using a phenomenological approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, our results suggest that an interdisciplinary approach is perceived as beneficial by patients with chronic pain. Four themes were highlighted. The first theme was that patients felt their pain was understood in a holistic manner. The second theme was that the participants felt seen and understood. The third theme emphasized the value of having further actions recommended and initiated. The fourth theme was a feeling of being overwhelmed by an interdisciplinary approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A majority of the participants found an interdisciplinary approach to be helpful. However, some patients may find it challenging to meet the entire interdisciplinary team at once.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"5103-5111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12375322/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S526302\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S526302","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性疼痛是一个普遍存在的问题,寻找有效的、受患者重视的干预措施非常重要。在研究医院,通常采用跨学科的方法,包括由心理学家、物理治疗师和医生进行评估。我们想用这种跨学科的方法来研究患者的经历。方法:我们对北挪威大学医院疼痛科的9名患者进行了半结构化访谈。采访是在2023年1月和2月进行的。访谈采用现象学方法进行分析。结果:总的来说,我们的结果表明跨学科的治疗方法对慢性疼痛患者是有益的。会议突出了四个主题。第一个主题是病人觉得他们的疼痛得到了全面的理解。第二个主题是参与者感到被看到和理解。第三个主题强调建议和发起进一步行动的价值。第四个主题是一种被跨学科方法淹没的感觉。结论:大多数参与者发现跨学科的方法是有帮助的。然而,一些患者可能会发现一次见到整个跨学科团队是具有挑战性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patients' Experiences with an Interdisciplinary Team Assessment of Chronic Pain: A Qualitative Interview Study.

Background: Chronic pain is a widespread issue, and it is important to find interventions that are effective and valued by patients. At the study hospital, an interdisciplinary approach is often used, involving an assessment by a psychologist, physiotherapist, and doctor. We wanted to examine patients' experiences with this interdisciplinary approach.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with nine patients at the Pain Department at the University Hospital of North Norway. The interviews were conducted in January and February 2023. The interviews were analyzed using a phenomenological approach.

Results: Overall, our results suggest that an interdisciplinary approach is perceived as beneficial by patients with chronic pain. Four themes were highlighted. The first theme was that patients felt their pain was understood in a holistic manner. The second theme was that the participants felt seen and understood. The third theme emphasized the value of having further actions recommended and initiated. The fourth theme was a feeling of being overwhelmed by an interdisciplinary approach.

Conclusion: A majority of the participants found an interdisciplinary approach to be helpful. However, some patients may find it challenging to meet the entire interdisciplinary team at once.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信