药师主导的数字健康干预改善高血压患者的治疗结果-系统综述。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-08-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S530575
Geraldo Surya, Angelica, Widya Norma Insani
{"title":"药师主导的数字健康干预改善高血压患者的治疗结果-系统综述。","authors":"Geraldo Surya, Angelica, Widya Norma Insani","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S530575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the advancement of digital technologies, pharmacist-led digital health interventions (DHI) have emerged as a promising strategy to improve hypertension management. This systematic review evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from December 1996 to May 2024, identified via PubMed by incorporating key concepts including DHIs, pharmaceutical care, and hypertension. The review included RCTs assessed telephone-, web-, or mobile-based pharmacist-led DHI compared to usual care (UC). Primary outcomes included blood pressure (BP) reduction, medication adherence, and identification of drug-related problems (DRPs). Following the modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, fourteen RCTs met inclusion criteria, with interventions categorized as telephone monitoring (n = 6), web-based interventions (n = 5), and mobile-based interventions (n = 3). Eight studies (57.14%) showed significant BP reduction in the intervention group (IG), one (7.14%) reported diastolic blood pressure (DBP) reduction only, and one found no significant BP difference between IG and control group (CG). One study reported a higher BP control rate in the IG (OR = 3.64). All studies evaluating adherence (n = 5) showed improvements, and one reported enhanced DRP identification. We identified that interventions' effectiveness is influenced by frequency of the intervention, personalization, and patient engagement. Designing an intervention compatible with each patient and providing sufficient guidance may improve effectiveness. As most studies were conducted in high-income countries, further research is needed to ensure the applicability of DHIs in diverse settings. In conclusion, pharmacist-led DHIs demonstrate potential in improving hypertension outcomes, with further validation required to support their implementation across varied healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"5275-5287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12399858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacist-Led Digital Health Interventions to Improve Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Hypertension - A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Geraldo Surya, Angelica, Widya Norma Insani\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JMDH.S530575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With the advancement of digital technologies, pharmacist-led digital health interventions (DHI) have emerged as a promising strategy to improve hypertension management. This systematic review evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from December 1996 to May 2024, identified via PubMed by incorporating key concepts including DHIs, pharmaceutical care, and hypertension. The review included RCTs assessed telephone-, web-, or mobile-based pharmacist-led DHI compared to usual care (UC). Primary outcomes included blood pressure (BP) reduction, medication adherence, and identification of drug-related problems (DRPs). Following the modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, fourteen RCTs met inclusion criteria, with interventions categorized as telephone monitoring (n = 6), web-based interventions (n = 5), and mobile-based interventions (n = 3). Eight studies (57.14%) showed significant BP reduction in the intervention group (IG), one (7.14%) reported diastolic blood pressure (DBP) reduction only, and one found no significant BP difference between IG and control group (CG). One study reported a higher BP control rate in the IG (OR = 3.64). All studies evaluating adherence (n = 5) showed improvements, and one reported enhanced DRP identification. We identified that interventions' effectiveness is influenced by frequency of the intervention, personalization, and patient engagement. Designing an intervention compatible with each patient and providing sufficient guidance may improve effectiveness. As most studies were conducted in high-income countries, further research is needed to ensure the applicability of DHIs in diverse settings. In conclusion, pharmacist-led DHIs demonstrate potential in improving hypertension outcomes, with further validation required to support their implementation across varied healthcare systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"5275-5287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12399858/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S530575\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S530575","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着数字技术的进步,药剂师主导的数字健康干预(DHI)已成为改善高血压管理的一种有前途的策略。本系统综述评估了1996年12月至2024年5月期间发表的随机对照试验(rct),这些试验通过PubMed确定,纳入了DHIs、药物护理和高血压等关键概念。该综述包括评估电话、网络或移动为基础的药师主导的DHI与常规护理(UC)的随机对照试验。主要结局包括血压(BP)降低、药物依从性和药物相关问题(DRPs)的识别。根据修改后的系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,14项随机对照试验符合纳入标准,干预措施分为电话监测(n = 6)、基于网络的干预(n = 5)和基于移动的干预(n = 3)。8项研究(57.14%)显示干预组(IG)血压显著降低,1项研究(7.14%)仅报告舒张压(DBP)降低,1项研究发现IG组与对照组(CG)血压无显著差异。一项研究报告IG组血压控制率较高(OR = 3.64)。所有评估依从性的研究(n = 5)都显示出改善,其中一项研究报告了DRP识别的增强。我们发现干预的有效性受到干预频率、个性化和患者参与的影响。设计适合每位患者的干预措施,并提供充分的指导,可以提高疗效。由于大多数研究都是在高收入国家进行的,因此需要进一步研究以确保在不同环境中适用DHIs。总之,药剂师主导的DHIs显示出改善高血压预后的潜力,需要进一步验证以支持其在不同医疗保健系统中的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Pharmacist-Led Digital Health Interventions to Improve Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Hypertension - A Systematic Review.

Pharmacist-Led Digital Health Interventions to Improve Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Hypertension - A Systematic Review.

With the advancement of digital technologies, pharmacist-led digital health interventions (DHI) have emerged as a promising strategy to improve hypertension management. This systematic review evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from December 1996 to May 2024, identified via PubMed by incorporating key concepts including DHIs, pharmaceutical care, and hypertension. The review included RCTs assessed telephone-, web-, or mobile-based pharmacist-led DHI compared to usual care (UC). Primary outcomes included blood pressure (BP) reduction, medication adherence, and identification of drug-related problems (DRPs). Following the modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, fourteen RCTs met inclusion criteria, with interventions categorized as telephone monitoring (n = 6), web-based interventions (n = 5), and mobile-based interventions (n = 3). Eight studies (57.14%) showed significant BP reduction in the intervention group (IG), one (7.14%) reported diastolic blood pressure (DBP) reduction only, and one found no significant BP difference between IG and control group (CG). One study reported a higher BP control rate in the IG (OR = 3.64). All studies evaluating adherence (n = 5) showed improvements, and one reported enhanced DRP identification. We identified that interventions' effectiveness is influenced by frequency of the intervention, personalization, and patient engagement. Designing an intervention compatible with each patient and providing sufficient guidance may improve effectiveness. As most studies were conducted in high-income countries, further research is needed to ensure the applicability of DHIs in diverse settings. In conclusion, pharmacist-led DHIs demonstrate potential in improving hypertension outcomes, with further validation required to support their implementation across varied healthcare systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信