急性脑卒中院前阶段临床实践指南:1 .急诊医疗服务评估工具的使用

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jae Sang Oh, Dongwook Seo, Jinwoo Jeong, Kyoung-Chul Cha, Yong Soo Cho, Su Jin Kim, Jongkyu Park, Won-Sang Cho, Se Won Oh, Jang Hun Kim, Hyeong Jin Lee, Hong Suk Ahn, Yuna Jo, Jung-Jae Kim, Kyoung Min Jang, Gi-Yong Yun, Jong Min Lee, Hoon Kim, Young Woo Kim, Tae Gon Kim, Sung-Kon Ha, Sukh Que Park, Soon Chan Kwon
{"title":"急性脑卒中院前阶段临床实践指南:1 .急诊医疗服务评估工具的使用","authors":"Jae Sang Oh, Dongwook Seo, Jinwoo Jeong, Kyoung-Chul Cha, Yong Soo Cho, Su Jin Kim, Jongkyu Park, Won-Sang Cho, Se Won Oh, Jang Hun Kim, Hyeong Jin Lee, Hong Suk Ahn, Yuna Jo, Jung-Jae Kim, Kyoung Min Jang, Gi-Yong Yun, Jong Min Lee, Hoon Kim, Young Woo Kim, Tae Gon Kim, Sung-Kon Ha, Sukh Que Park, Soon Chan Kwon","doi":"10.3340/jkns.2025.0106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate and early identification of stroke and large vessel occlusion (LVO) in emergency settings is essential for improving patient outcomes and ensuring the efficient allocation of medical resources. This clinical practice guideline systematically reviews domestic and international literature and conducts meta-analyses to evaluate the utility and diagnostic accuracy of stroke assessment tools used in prehospital emergency medical services (EMS). We developed a guideline based on evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses via a de novo process. A systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of diagnostic EMS assessment tools for diagnosing stroke and LVO. Overall, 70 non-randomized control studies were selected for this study. A meta-analysis was conducted with a subgroup analysis to distinguish between patients with stroke and those with LVO. EMS tools demonstrated high sensitivity but low specificity for diagnosing stroke. In the prehospital setting, using validated EMS stroke assessment tools is recommended for the early identification of stroke and LVO. Upon hospital arrival, stroke specialists should conduct further evaluation and triage to confirm the diagnosis and guide appropriate management. Delays in diagnosing LVO are frequently unacceptable. While experts advocate for the use of EMS assessment tools to facilitate early identification of LVO, these tools alone lack adequate sensitivity. Therefore, further diagnostic evaluations and consultation with stroke specialists upon hospital arrival are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":16283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Practice Guideline for the Prehospital Stage in Acute Stroke : I. Use of Emergency Medical Services Assessment Tools.\",\"authors\":\"Jae Sang Oh, Dongwook Seo, Jinwoo Jeong, Kyoung-Chul Cha, Yong Soo Cho, Su Jin Kim, Jongkyu Park, Won-Sang Cho, Se Won Oh, Jang Hun Kim, Hyeong Jin Lee, Hong Suk Ahn, Yuna Jo, Jung-Jae Kim, Kyoung Min Jang, Gi-Yong Yun, Jong Min Lee, Hoon Kim, Young Woo Kim, Tae Gon Kim, Sung-Kon Ha, Sukh Que Park, Soon Chan Kwon\",\"doi\":\"10.3340/jkns.2025.0106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accurate and early identification of stroke and large vessel occlusion (LVO) in emergency settings is essential for improving patient outcomes and ensuring the efficient allocation of medical resources. This clinical practice guideline systematically reviews domestic and international literature and conducts meta-analyses to evaluate the utility and diagnostic accuracy of stroke assessment tools used in prehospital emergency medical services (EMS). We developed a guideline based on evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses via a de novo process. A systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of diagnostic EMS assessment tools for diagnosing stroke and LVO. Overall, 70 non-randomized control studies were selected for this study. A meta-analysis was conducted with a subgroup analysis to distinguish between patients with stroke and those with LVO. EMS tools demonstrated high sensitivity but low specificity for diagnosing stroke. In the prehospital setting, using validated EMS stroke assessment tools is recommended for the early identification of stroke and LVO. Upon hospital arrival, stroke specialists should conduct further evaluation and triage to confirm the diagnosis and guide appropriate management. Delays in diagnosing LVO are frequently unacceptable. While experts advocate for the use of EMS assessment tools to facilitate early identification of LVO, these tools alone lack adequate sensitivity. Therefore, further diagnostic evaluations and consultation with stroke specialists upon hospital arrival are recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2025.0106\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2025.0106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在紧急情况下,准确和早期识别卒中和大血管闭塞(LVO)对于改善患者预后和确保医疗资源的有效分配至关重要。本临床实践指南系统地回顾了国内外文献,并进行了荟萃分析,以评估院前紧急医疗服务(EMS)中使用的卒中评估工具的实用性和诊断准确性。我们通过从头开始的过程,基于系统评价和荟萃分析的证据制定了一个指南。我们进行了一项系统的文献综述,以评估诊断性EMS评估工具对诊断卒中和LVO的有用性。总的来说,本研究选择了70个非随机对照研究。采用亚组分析进行meta分析,以区分卒中患者和LVO患者。EMS工具对脑卒中的诊断灵敏度高,特异性低。在院前环境中,建议使用经过验证的EMS卒中评估工具来早期识别卒中和LVO。到达医院后,中风专家应进行进一步的评估和分诊,以确认诊断并指导适当的管理。诊断LVO的延迟通常是不可接受的。虽然专家们提倡使用EMS评估工具来促进早期识别LVO,但这些工具本身缺乏足够的灵敏度。因此,建议在到达医院时进行进一步的诊断评估并咨询中风专家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Practice Guideline for the Prehospital Stage in Acute Stroke : I. Use of Emergency Medical Services Assessment Tools.

Accurate and early identification of stroke and large vessel occlusion (LVO) in emergency settings is essential for improving patient outcomes and ensuring the efficient allocation of medical resources. This clinical practice guideline systematically reviews domestic and international literature and conducts meta-analyses to evaluate the utility and diagnostic accuracy of stroke assessment tools used in prehospital emergency medical services (EMS). We developed a guideline based on evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses via a de novo process. A systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of diagnostic EMS assessment tools for diagnosing stroke and LVO. Overall, 70 non-randomized control studies were selected for this study. A meta-analysis was conducted with a subgroup analysis to distinguish between patients with stroke and those with LVO. EMS tools demonstrated high sensitivity but low specificity for diagnosing stroke. In the prehospital setting, using validated EMS stroke assessment tools is recommended for the early identification of stroke and LVO. Upon hospital arrival, stroke specialists should conduct further evaluation and triage to confirm the diagnosis and guide appropriate management. Delays in diagnosing LVO are frequently unacceptable. While experts advocate for the use of EMS assessment tools to facilitate early identification of LVO, these tools alone lack adequate sensitivity. Therefore, further diagnostic evaluations and consultation with stroke specialists upon hospital arrival are recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society (J Korean Neurosurg Soc) is the official journal of the Korean Neurosurgical Society, and published bimonthly (1st day of January, March, May, July, September, and November). It launched in October 31, 1972 with Volume 1 and Number 1. J Korean Neurosurg Soc aims to allow neurosurgeons from around the world to enrich their knowledge of patient management, education, and clinical or experimental research, and hence their professionalism. This journal publishes Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Case Reports, Technical Notes, and Letters to the Editor. Our field of interest involves clinical neurosurgery (cerebrovascular disease, neuro-oncology, skull base neurosurgery, spine, pediatric neurosurgery, functional neurosurgery, epilepsy, neuro-trauma, and peripheral nerve disease) and laboratory work in neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信