澳大利亚单一中心老年患者胶质母细胞瘤的管理。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Kimberley Budgen, Danica Cossio, Danny R. Youlden, Nathan Dunn, Suzanne Poulgrain, Katharine Cuff, Margaret McGrath, Andrew Pullar, Matthew C. Foote, Rumal Jayalath, Julie Moore, Mark B. Pinkham
{"title":"澳大利亚单一中心老年患者胶质母细胞瘤的管理。","authors":"Kimberley Budgen,&nbsp;Danica Cossio,&nbsp;Danny R. Youlden,&nbsp;Nathan Dunn,&nbsp;Suzanne Poulgrain,&nbsp;Katharine Cuff,&nbsp;Margaret McGrath,&nbsp;Andrew Pullar,&nbsp;Matthew C. Foote,&nbsp;Rumal Jayalath,&nbsp;Julie Moore,&nbsp;Mark B. Pinkham","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Glioblastoma management in elderly patients is challenging. The aim of this study was to review oncological treatment strategies at a single institution from 2011 to 2020.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients aged ≥ 70 years who received radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy for radiological or histological glioblastoma were identified from a centralised database. Patients receiving supportive care only were excluded, whether or not they had surgery at diagnosis. Clinicopathologic data and treatment modalities were collected. Median survival from diagnosis was calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seventy-eight people were identified during the study period, median age 74.5 years (range 70–88). Seventy-five people had surgery (24 biopsy only, and 51 resection) and three people had radiological diagnosis only. The most common first-line treatment was concurrent chemoradiation (33/78, 42%). Only 18/33 (55%) went on to receive adjuvant temozolomide, median of five cycles (interquartile range [IQR] 2–6). The most common radiotherapy dose was 40 Gy in 15 fractions (52/73, 71%) and 60 Gy in 30 fractions was less frequently prescribed over time. Second-line therapy for recurrent or progressive disease was received in 23% overall, and varied in modality. Median survival was 7.0 months (IQR 4.4–12.5), and 6.4% (CI 4.3%–9.1%) at 2 years.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Survival is poor for elderly patients with glioblastoma despite treatment. Concurrent chemoradiation was the most common treatment strategy, and 40 Gy in 15 fractions was the most common radiotherapy schedule. A small proportion of people received treatment for recurrent disease, and modality varied greatly.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"69 7","pages":"757-762"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of Glioblastoma in Elderly Patients in a Single Australian Centre\",\"authors\":\"Kimberley Budgen,&nbsp;Danica Cossio,&nbsp;Danny R. Youlden,&nbsp;Nathan Dunn,&nbsp;Suzanne Poulgrain,&nbsp;Katharine Cuff,&nbsp;Margaret McGrath,&nbsp;Andrew Pullar,&nbsp;Matthew C. Foote,&nbsp;Rumal Jayalath,&nbsp;Julie Moore,&nbsp;Mark B. Pinkham\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1754-9485.70010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Glioblastoma management in elderly patients is challenging. The aim of this study was to review oncological treatment strategies at a single institution from 2011 to 2020.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients aged ≥ 70 years who received radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy for radiological or histological glioblastoma were identified from a centralised database. Patients receiving supportive care only were excluded, whether or not they had surgery at diagnosis. Clinicopathologic data and treatment modalities were collected. Median survival from diagnosis was calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Seventy-eight people were identified during the study period, median age 74.5 years (range 70–88). Seventy-five people had surgery (24 biopsy only, and 51 resection) and three people had radiological diagnosis only. The most common first-line treatment was concurrent chemoradiation (33/78, 42%). Only 18/33 (55%) went on to receive adjuvant temozolomide, median of five cycles (interquartile range [IQR] 2–6). The most common radiotherapy dose was 40 Gy in 15 fractions (52/73, 71%) and 60 Gy in 30 fractions was less frequently prescribed over time. Second-line therapy for recurrent or progressive disease was received in 23% overall, and varied in modality. Median survival was 7.0 months (IQR 4.4–12.5), and 6.4% (CI 4.3%–9.1%) at 2 years.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Survival is poor for elderly patients with glioblastoma despite treatment. Concurrent chemoradiation was the most common treatment strategy, and 40 Gy in 15 fractions was the most common radiotherapy schedule. A small proportion of people received treatment for recurrent disease, and modality varied greatly.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"69 7\",\"pages\":\"757-762\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.70010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.70010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

老年胶质母细胞瘤患者的治疗具有挑战性。本研究的目的是回顾2011年至2020年在单一机构的肿瘤治疗策略。方法:年龄≥70岁接受放射学或组织学胶质母细胞瘤放疗和/或化疗的患者从集中数据库中确定。仅接受支持性治疗的患者被排除在外,无论他们在诊断时是否进行了手术。收集临床病理资料及治疗方法。诊断后的中位生存期采用Kaplan-Meier法计算。结果:78人在研究期间被确定,中位年龄74.5岁(范围70-88)。75人接受了手术(24人只做了活检,51人只做了切除),3人只做了放射诊断。最常见的一线治疗是同步放化疗(33/ 78,42 %)。只有18/33(55%)继续接受替莫唑胺辅助治疗,5个周期的中位数(四分位数范围[IQR] 2-6)。最常见的放疗剂量为15次40 Gy(52/ 73,71%), 30次60 Gy的剂量随着时间的推移越来越少。总有23%的患者接受了复发或进展性疾病的二线治疗,并且治疗方式各不相同。中位生存期为7.0个月(IQR 4.4-12.5), 2年为6.4% (CI 4.3%-9.1%)。结论:老年胶质母细胞瘤患者虽经治疗,但生存率较差。同步放化疗是最常见的治疗策略,最常见的放疗方案是15次40 Gy。一小部分人接受复发性疾病的治疗,治疗方式差异很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Management of Glioblastoma in Elderly Patients in a Single Australian Centre

Management of Glioblastoma in Elderly Patients in a Single Australian Centre

Introduction

Glioblastoma management in elderly patients is challenging. The aim of this study was to review oncological treatment strategies at a single institution from 2011 to 2020.

Methods

Patients aged ≥ 70 years who received radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy for radiological or histological glioblastoma were identified from a centralised database. Patients receiving supportive care only were excluded, whether or not they had surgery at diagnosis. Clinicopathologic data and treatment modalities were collected. Median survival from diagnosis was calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

Seventy-eight people were identified during the study period, median age 74.5 years (range 70–88). Seventy-five people had surgery (24 biopsy only, and 51 resection) and three people had radiological diagnosis only. The most common first-line treatment was concurrent chemoradiation (33/78, 42%). Only 18/33 (55%) went on to receive adjuvant temozolomide, median of five cycles (interquartile range [IQR] 2–6). The most common radiotherapy dose was 40 Gy in 15 fractions (52/73, 71%) and 60 Gy in 30 fractions was less frequently prescribed over time. Second-line therapy for recurrent or progressive disease was received in 23% overall, and varied in modality. Median survival was 7.0 months (IQR 4.4–12.5), and 6.4% (CI 4.3%–9.1%) at 2 years.

Conclusion

Survival is poor for elderly patients with glioblastoma despite treatment. Concurrent chemoradiation was the most common treatment strategy, and 40 Gy in 15 fractions was the most common radiotherapy schedule. A small proportion of people received treatment for recurrent disease, and modality varied greatly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信