超声引导下连续囊包神经阻滞对老年全髋关节置换术患者围手术期镇痛的影响:回顾性研究。

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Journal of Investigative Surgery Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-28 DOI:10.1080/08941939.2025.2540814
Manyu Wu, Wensheng He
{"title":"超声引导下连续囊包神经阻滞对老年全髋关节置换术患者围手术期镇痛的影响:回顾性研究。","authors":"Manyu Wu, Wensheng He","doi":"10.1080/08941939.2025.2540814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in elderly patients is often associated with significant perioperative pain. This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) and pericapsular nerve group block (PENGB) in elderly patients undergoing THA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included two patient groups: the PENGB group (<i>n</i> = 62) and the FICB group (<i>n</i> = 64). The primary outcome was the analgesic efficacy, assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores at multiple postoperative time points. Secondary outcomes included motor blockade, the time to first rescue analgesia, postoperative analgesia quality and systemic inflammatory responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PENGB provided significantly superior analgesia at 6 and 12 h postoperatively, as evidenced by lower VAS pain scores compared to the FICB group. Motor blockade was also less pronounced in the PENGB group at 3 and 6 h post-surgery. The time to first rescue analgesia was significantly longer in the PENGB group, indicating more sustained pain control. Additionally, PENGB was associated with reduced use of patient-controlled analgesia pumps and lower total sufentanil consumption. At 24 h postoperatively, interleukin-6 levels were significantly lower in the PENGB group, suggesting an attenuated inflammatory response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to FICB, PENGB provided superior analgesia in elderly patients undergoing THA.</p>","PeriodicalId":16200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","volume":"38 1","pages":"2540814"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Pericapsular Nerve Group Block on Perioperative Analgesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Manyu Wu, Wensheng He\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08941939.2025.2540814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in elderly patients is often associated with significant perioperative pain. This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) and pericapsular nerve group block (PENGB) in elderly patients undergoing THA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included two patient groups: the PENGB group (<i>n</i> = 62) and the FICB group (<i>n</i> = 64). The primary outcome was the analgesic efficacy, assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores at multiple postoperative time points. Secondary outcomes included motor blockade, the time to first rescue analgesia, postoperative analgesia quality and systemic inflammatory responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PENGB provided significantly superior analgesia at 6 and 12 h postoperatively, as evidenced by lower VAS pain scores compared to the FICB group. Motor blockade was also less pronounced in the PENGB group at 3 and 6 h post-surgery. The time to first rescue analgesia was significantly longer in the PENGB group, indicating more sustained pain control. Additionally, PENGB was associated with reduced use of patient-controlled analgesia pumps and lower total sufentanil consumption. At 24 h postoperatively, interleukin-6 levels were significantly lower in the PENGB group, suggesting an attenuated inflammatory response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to FICB, PENGB provided superior analgesia in elderly patients undergoing THA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Investigative Surgery\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"2540814\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Investigative Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2025.2540814\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2025.2540814","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年患者全髋关节置换术(THA)常伴有明显的围手术期疼痛。本研究旨在评价髂筋膜间室阻滞(FICB)和囊周神经群阻滞(PENGB)对老年THA患者的镇痛效果。方法:回顾性研究包括两组患者:PENGB组(n = 62)和FICB组(n = 64)。主要终点是镇痛效果,在术后多个时间点使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分进行评估。次要结局包括运动阻断、首次镇痛时间、术后镇痛质量和全身炎症反应。结果:与FICB组相比,PENGB组在术后6和12小时的镇痛效果明显优于FICB组,VAS疼痛评分较低。术后3和6小时,PENGB组的运动阻滞也不太明显。PENGB组首次抢救镇痛的时间明显更长,表明疼痛控制更持久。此外,PENGB与患者自控镇痛泵的使用减少和舒芬太尼总消耗量降低有关。术后24小时,PENGB组的白细胞介素-6水平明显降低,表明炎症反应减弱。结论:与FICB相比,PENGB在老年THA患者中具有更好的镇痛效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Pericapsular Nerve Group Block on Perioperative Analgesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study.

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in elderly patients is often associated with significant perioperative pain. This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) and pericapsular nerve group block (PENGB) in elderly patients undergoing THA.

Methods: This retrospective study included two patient groups: the PENGB group (n = 62) and the FICB group (n = 64). The primary outcome was the analgesic efficacy, assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores at multiple postoperative time points. Secondary outcomes included motor blockade, the time to first rescue analgesia, postoperative analgesia quality and systemic inflammatory responses.

Results: PENGB provided significantly superior analgesia at 6 and 12 h postoperatively, as evidenced by lower VAS pain scores compared to the FICB group. Motor blockade was also less pronounced in the PENGB group at 3 and 6 h post-surgery. The time to first rescue analgesia was significantly longer in the PENGB group, indicating more sustained pain control. Additionally, PENGB was associated with reduced use of patient-controlled analgesia pumps and lower total sufentanil consumption. At 24 h postoperatively, interleukin-6 levels were significantly lower in the PENGB group, suggesting an attenuated inflammatory response.

Conclusions: Compared to FICB, PENGB provided superior analgesia in elderly patients undergoing THA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Surgery publishes peer-reviewed scientific articles for the advancement of surgery, to the ultimate benefit of patient care and rehabilitation. It is the only journal that encompasses the individual and collaborative efforts of scientists in human and veterinary medicine, dentistry, basic and applied sciences, engineering, and law and ethics. The journal is dedicated to the publication of outstanding articles of interest to the surgical research community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信