Victor J M Zeijen, Martijn J Tilly, Kari A Saville, Bruno H C Stricker, Isabella Kardys, M Kamran Ikram, Maryam Kavousi, Joost Daemen
{"title":"与以人群为基础的队列比较,肾交感神经去支配的长期安全性和有效性:倾向匹配方法。","authors":"Victor J M Zeijen, Martijn J Tilly, Kari A Saville, Bruno H C Stricker, Isabella Kardys, M Kamran Ikram, Maryam Kavousi, Joost Daemen","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000004117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the long-term changes in risk of cardiovascular outcomes and blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients treated with renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) as compared to hypertensive controls from a population-based cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included patients with office systolic blood pressure (SBP) at least 140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP at least 90 mmHg. Patients treated with RDN were matched to hypertensive controls from the population-based Rotterdam Study using one-to-many variable-ratio propensity score matching. The primary safety outcome was a composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke, renal failure and mortality. The primary efficacy outcome was the 5-year change in office SBP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 RDN patients were matched to 238 population-based controls. Median age [25th-75th percentile] was 60.5 [56.5-68.4] years (46% female). Baseline BP ±SD was 166.1/95.5 ± 20.6/10.9 mmHg. Patients were prescribed 2.8 [1.5-4.5] defined daily dosages of antihypertensive drugs. The incidence of the primary safety outcome was similar among the RDN group and the control group at 5 years [13 vs. 18%; hazard ratio 0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-2.38; P = 0.87]. The 5-year change in SBP was -12.0 [-18.0, -6.0] mmHg in the RDN group ( P < 0.001) and -14.9 [-22.5 to -7.3] mmHg in the control group ( P < 0.001), with no significant between-group difference [2.9 (-6.6 to 12.4) mmHg; P = 0.55].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with uncontrolled hypertension undergoing RDN did not have a significantly lower risk for future adverse cardiovascular events as compared to hypertensive controls from a population-based study. No difference in office BP was observed at 5 years. While real-world observational data could provide valuable insights, randomized trials are needed to confirm the role of RDN in improving long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"1832-1840"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term safety and efficacy of renal sympathetic denervation in comparison to a population-based cohort: a propensity-matching approach.\",\"authors\":\"Victor J M Zeijen, Martijn J Tilly, Kari A Saville, Bruno H C Stricker, Isabella Kardys, M Kamran Ikram, Maryam Kavousi, Joost Daemen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HJH.0000000000004117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the long-term changes in risk of cardiovascular outcomes and blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients treated with renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) as compared to hypertensive controls from a population-based cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included patients with office systolic blood pressure (SBP) at least 140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP at least 90 mmHg. Patients treated with RDN were matched to hypertensive controls from the population-based Rotterdam Study using one-to-many variable-ratio propensity score matching. The primary safety outcome was a composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke, renal failure and mortality. The primary efficacy outcome was the 5-year change in office SBP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 RDN patients were matched to 238 population-based controls. Median age [25th-75th percentile] was 60.5 [56.5-68.4] years (46% female). Baseline BP ±SD was 166.1/95.5 ± 20.6/10.9 mmHg. Patients were prescribed 2.8 [1.5-4.5] defined daily dosages of antihypertensive drugs. The incidence of the primary safety outcome was similar among the RDN group and the control group at 5 years [13 vs. 18%; hazard ratio 0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-2.38; P = 0.87]. The 5-year change in SBP was -12.0 [-18.0, -6.0] mmHg in the RDN group ( P < 0.001) and -14.9 [-22.5 to -7.3] mmHg in the control group ( P < 0.001), with no significant between-group difference [2.9 (-6.6 to 12.4) mmHg; P = 0.55].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with uncontrolled hypertension undergoing RDN did not have a significantly lower risk for future adverse cardiovascular events as compared to hypertensive controls from a population-based study. No difference in office BP was observed at 5 years. While real-world observational data could provide valuable insights, randomized trials are needed to confirm the role of RDN in improving long-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1832-1840\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000004117\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000004117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-term safety and efficacy of renal sympathetic denervation in comparison to a population-based cohort: a propensity-matching approach.
Objective: To evaluate the long-term changes in risk of cardiovascular outcomes and blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients treated with renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) as compared to hypertensive controls from a population-based cohort.
Methods: This prospective cohort study included patients with office systolic blood pressure (SBP) at least 140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP at least 90 mmHg. Patients treated with RDN were matched to hypertensive controls from the population-based Rotterdam Study using one-to-many variable-ratio propensity score matching. The primary safety outcome was a composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke, renal failure and mortality. The primary efficacy outcome was the 5-year change in office SBP.
Results: A total of 53 RDN patients were matched to 238 population-based controls. Median age [25th-75th percentile] was 60.5 [56.5-68.4] years (46% female). Baseline BP ±SD was 166.1/95.5 ± 20.6/10.9 mmHg. Patients were prescribed 2.8 [1.5-4.5] defined daily dosages of antihypertensive drugs. The incidence of the primary safety outcome was similar among the RDN group and the control group at 5 years [13 vs. 18%; hazard ratio 0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-2.38; P = 0.87]. The 5-year change in SBP was -12.0 [-18.0, -6.0] mmHg in the RDN group ( P < 0.001) and -14.9 [-22.5 to -7.3] mmHg in the control group ( P < 0.001), with no significant between-group difference [2.9 (-6.6 to 12.4) mmHg; P = 0.55].
Conclusion: Patients with uncontrolled hypertension undergoing RDN did not have a significantly lower risk for future adverse cardiovascular events as compared to hypertensive controls from a population-based study. No difference in office BP was observed at 5 years. While real-world observational data could provide valuable insights, randomized trials are needed to confirm the role of RDN in improving long-term outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hypertension publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension. The Journal publishes full papers, reviews or editorials (normally by invitation), and correspondence.