罗德岛移动认知评估工具在检测老年人认知障碍中的自我管理的可用性。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sydney C Sullivan, Melissa G Zammitti, Taylor Maynard, Kunal Mankodiya, Nicholas Constant, Laura E Korthauer, Brian R Ott, Charles Denby, Alyssa N De Vito, Geoffrey Tremont
{"title":"罗德岛移动认知评估工具在检测老年人认知障碍中的自我管理的可用性。","authors":"Sydney C Sullivan, Melissa G Zammitti, Taylor Maynard, Kunal Mankodiya, Nicholas Constant, Laura E Korthauer, Brian R Ott, Charles Denby, Alyssa N De Vito, Geoffrey Tremont","doi":"10.1177/08919887251375475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study evaluated the usability of the Rhode Island Mobile Cognitive Assessment Tool (RIMCAT), a proctored digital cognitive screening measure to assess its potential for self-administration.Methods100 participants (Healthy Controls [HC] <i>n</i> = 50; Cognitively Impaired [CI] <i>n</i> = 50) were recruited, and 90 completed the RIMCAT twice, with verbal prompts when necessary. Participants then completed an exit survey regarding their experience.ResultsAll HC completed the RIMCAT, but four CI individuals could not. Most finished in under 30 min. HC (M = 2.18, SD = 1.93) required significantly fewer prompts during the first RIMCAT administration compared to the CI group (M = 3.82, SD = 2.87). Both groups needed fewer prompts on the second visit, with prompts often related to input methods, button use, and instruction comprehension.ConclusionsThe RIMCAT shows promise for self-administration, particularly with minor modifications that could improve clarity, interface design, and user experience for optimal usability and self-administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"8919887251375475"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usability of the Rhode Island Mobile Cognitive Assessment Tool for Self-Administration in Detecting Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Sydney C Sullivan, Melissa G Zammitti, Taylor Maynard, Kunal Mankodiya, Nicholas Constant, Laura E Korthauer, Brian R Ott, Charles Denby, Alyssa N De Vito, Geoffrey Tremont\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08919887251375475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study evaluated the usability of the Rhode Island Mobile Cognitive Assessment Tool (RIMCAT), a proctored digital cognitive screening measure to assess its potential for self-administration.Methods100 participants (Healthy Controls [HC] <i>n</i> = 50; Cognitively Impaired [CI] <i>n</i> = 50) were recruited, and 90 completed the RIMCAT twice, with verbal prompts when necessary. Participants then completed an exit survey regarding their experience.ResultsAll HC completed the RIMCAT, but four CI individuals could not. Most finished in under 30 min. HC (M = 2.18, SD = 1.93) required significantly fewer prompts during the first RIMCAT administration compared to the CI group (M = 3.82, SD = 2.87). Both groups needed fewer prompts on the second visit, with prompts often related to input methods, button use, and instruction comprehension.ConclusionsThe RIMCAT shows promise for self-administration, particularly with minor modifications that could improve clarity, interface design, and user experience for optimal usability and self-administration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8919887251375475\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251375475\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251375475","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究评估罗德岛移动认知评估工具(RIMCAT)的可用性,这是一种监控的数字认知筛查措施,以评估其自我管理的潜力。方法招募100名受试者(健康对照组[HC] n = 50;认知障碍[CI] n = 50),其中90名受试者完成两次RIMCAT,必要时给予口头提示。然后,参与者完成了一份关于他们经历的离职调查。结果HC组均能完成RIMCAT, CI组有4例不能完成。大多数在30分钟内完成。与CI组(M = 3.82, SD = 2.87)相比,HC组(M = 2.18, SD = 1.93)在第一次给药时需要的提示显著减少。两组在第二次访问时都需要更少的提示,提示通常与输入法、按钮使用和指令理解有关。结论:RIMCAT显示了自我管理的希望,特别是通过微小的修改可以提高清晰度,界面设计和用户体验,以实现最佳的可用性和自我管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Usability of the Rhode Island Mobile Cognitive Assessment Tool for Self-Administration in Detecting Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults.

ObjectiveThis study evaluated the usability of the Rhode Island Mobile Cognitive Assessment Tool (RIMCAT), a proctored digital cognitive screening measure to assess its potential for self-administration.Methods100 participants (Healthy Controls [HC] n = 50; Cognitively Impaired [CI] n = 50) were recruited, and 90 completed the RIMCAT twice, with verbal prompts when necessary. Participants then completed an exit survey regarding their experience.ResultsAll HC completed the RIMCAT, but four CI individuals could not. Most finished in under 30 min. HC (M = 2.18, SD = 1.93) required significantly fewer prompts during the first RIMCAT administration compared to the CI group (M = 3.82, SD = 2.87). Both groups needed fewer prompts on the second visit, with prompts often related to input methods, button use, and instruction comprehension.ConclusionsThe RIMCAT shows promise for self-administration, particularly with minor modifications that could improve clarity, interface design, and user experience for optimal usability and self-administration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (JGP) brings together original research, clinical reviews, and timely case reports on neuropsychiatric care of aging patients, including age-related biologic, neurologic, and psychiatric illnesses; psychosocial problems; forensic issues; and family care. The journal offers the latest peer-reviewed information on cognitive, mood, anxiety, addictive, and sleep disorders in older patients, as well as tested diagnostic tools and therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信