Paolo Evangelista, Lorenzo Rum, Pietro Picerno, Andrea Biscarini
{"title":"解读肩膀和肘部力学对杠铃运动学和卧推和顶压练习中粘着区域的贡献:单关节和双关节肌肉的链式模型。","authors":"Paolo Evangelista, Lorenzo Rum, Pietro Picerno, Andrea Biscarini","doi":"10.3390/jfmk10030322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study investigates the biomechanics of the bench press and overhead press exercises by modeling the trunk and upper limbs as a kinematic chain of rigid links connected by revolute joints and actuated by single- and two-joint muscles, with motion constrained by the barbell. The aims were to (i) assess the different contributions of shoulder and elbow torques during lifting, (ii) identify the parameters influencing joint loads, (iii) explain the origin of the sticking region, and (iv) validate the model against experimental barbell kinematics. <b>Methods:</b> Equations of motion and joint reaction forces were derived analytically in closed form. Dynamic simulations produced vertical barbell velocity profiles under various conditions. A waveform similarity analysis was used to compare simulated profiles with experimental data from maximal bench press trials. <b>Results:</b> The sticking region occurred when shoulder torque dropped below a critical threshold, resulting in a local velocity minimum. Adding elbow torque reduced this dip and shifted the velocity minimum from 38 cm to 23 cm above the chest, although it prolonged the time needed to overcome it. Static analysis revealed that grip width and barbell constraint had a greater effect on shaping the sticking region than muscle architecture parameters. Elbow extensors contributed minimally during early lift phases but became dominant near full extension. Model predictions showed high similarity to experimental data in the pre-sticking (SI = 0.962, <i>p</i> = 0.028) and sticking (SI = 0.949, <i>p</i> = 0.014) phases, with reduced, non-significant similarity post-sticking (SI = 0.881, <i>p</i> > 0.05) due to the assumption of constant torques. <b>Conclusions:</b> The model offers biomechanical insight into how joint torques and barbell constraints shape movement. The findings support training strategies that target shoulder strength early in the lift and elbow strength near lockout to minimize sticking and improve performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decoding the Contribution of Shoulder and Elbow Mechanics to Barbell Kinematics and the Sticking Region in Bench and Overhead Press Exercises: A Link-Chain Model with Single- and Two-Joint Muscles.\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Evangelista, Lorenzo Rum, Pietro Picerno, Andrea Biscarini\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jfmk10030322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study investigates the biomechanics of the bench press and overhead press exercises by modeling the trunk and upper limbs as a kinematic chain of rigid links connected by revolute joints and actuated by single- and two-joint muscles, with motion constrained by the barbell. The aims were to (i) assess the different contributions of shoulder and elbow torques during lifting, (ii) identify the parameters influencing joint loads, (iii) explain the origin of the sticking region, and (iv) validate the model against experimental barbell kinematics. <b>Methods:</b> Equations of motion and joint reaction forces were derived analytically in closed form. Dynamic simulations produced vertical barbell velocity profiles under various conditions. A waveform similarity analysis was used to compare simulated profiles with experimental data from maximal bench press trials. <b>Results:</b> The sticking region occurred when shoulder torque dropped below a critical threshold, resulting in a local velocity minimum. Adding elbow torque reduced this dip and shifted the velocity minimum from 38 cm to 23 cm above the chest, although it prolonged the time needed to overcome it. Static analysis revealed that grip width and barbell constraint had a greater effect on shaping the sticking region than muscle architecture parameters. Elbow extensors contributed minimally during early lift phases but became dominant near full extension. Model predictions showed high similarity to experimental data in the pre-sticking (SI = 0.962, <i>p</i> = 0.028) and sticking (SI = 0.949, <i>p</i> = 0.014) phases, with reduced, non-significant similarity post-sticking (SI = 0.881, <i>p</i> > 0.05) due to the assumption of constant torques. <b>Conclusions:</b> The model offers biomechanical insight into how joint torques and barbell constraints shape movement. The findings support training strategies that target shoulder strength early in the lift and elbow strength near lockout to minimize sticking and improve performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372072/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10030322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10030322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究通过将躯干和上肢建模为由旋转关节连接并由单关节和双关节肌肉驱动的刚性链接的运动学链,并在杠铃的约束下运动,来研究卧推和顶推练习的生物力学。目的是(i)评估举重过程中肩部和肘部扭矩的不同贡献,(ii)确定影响关节载荷的参数,(iii)解释粘滞区域的起源,以及(iv)根据实验杠铃运动学验证模型。方法:以封闭形式解析导出运动方程和关节反作用力方程。动态模拟得到了不同条件下的垂直杠铃速度曲线。波形相似分析用于比较模拟轮廓与最大卧压试验的实验数据。结果:粘着区域发生在肩转矩低于临界阈值时,导致局部速度最小。增加肘部扭矩减少了这种倾斜,并将最小速度从38厘米提高到23厘米,尽管它延长了克服它所需的时间。静态分析表明,握力宽度和杠铃约束对粘着区域的影响大于肌肉结构参数。肘关节伸肌在早期的举举阶段贡献最小,但在完全伸展阶段成为主导。模型预测在粘接前(SI = 0.962, p = 0.028)和粘接(SI = 0.949, p = 0.014)阶段与实验数据高度相似,粘接后(SI = 0.881, p > 0.05)由于假设扭矩恒定,相似性降低,不显著。结论:该模型提供了关节扭矩和杠铃约束如何塑造运动的生物力学见解。研究结果支持训练策略,即在起举早期以肩部力量为目标,在闭锁时以肘部力量为目标,以减少卡伤并提高表现。
Decoding the Contribution of Shoulder and Elbow Mechanics to Barbell Kinematics and the Sticking Region in Bench and Overhead Press Exercises: A Link-Chain Model with Single- and Two-Joint Muscles.
Objectives: This study investigates the biomechanics of the bench press and overhead press exercises by modeling the trunk and upper limbs as a kinematic chain of rigid links connected by revolute joints and actuated by single- and two-joint muscles, with motion constrained by the barbell. The aims were to (i) assess the different contributions of shoulder and elbow torques during lifting, (ii) identify the parameters influencing joint loads, (iii) explain the origin of the sticking region, and (iv) validate the model against experimental barbell kinematics. Methods: Equations of motion and joint reaction forces were derived analytically in closed form. Dynamic simulations produced vertical barbell velocity profiles under various conditions. A waveform similarity analysis was used to compare simulated profiles with experimental data from maximal bench press trials. Results: The sticking region occurred when shoulder torque dropped below a critical threshold, resulting in a local velocity minimum. Adding elbow torque reduced this dip and shifted the velocity minimum from 38 cm to 23 cm above the chest, although it prolonged the time needed to overcome it. Static analysis revealed that grip width and barbell constraint had a greater effect on shaping the sticking region than muscle architecture parameters. Elbow extensors contributed minimally during early lift phases but became dominant near full extension. Model predictions showed high similarity to experimental data in the pre-sticking (SI = 0.962, p = 0.028) and sticking (SI = 0.949, p = 0.014) phases, with reduced, non-significant similarity post-sticking (SI = 0.881, p > 0.05) due to the assumption of constant torques. Conclusions: The model offers biomechanical insight into how joint torques and barbell constraints shape movement. The findings support training strategies that target shoulder strength early in the lift and elbow strength near lockout to minimize sticking and improve performance.