{"title":"基于深度学习的因果推理方法优化ICU患者耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染的个性化抗生素治疗。","authors":"Min Woo Kang, Shin Young Ahn","doi":"10.1016/j.jgar.2025.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Methicillin‑resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs) in intensive care units (ICUs) carry high mortality, and although vancomycin remains standard treatment, daptomycin and linezolid may benefit specific subgroups. This study evaluates the mortality reduction associated with vancomycin, daptomycin, and linezolid using a deep learning–based causal inference model.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III and MIMIC-IV databases, including 270 ICU patients with MRSA BSI. A deep learning-based causal inference model was used to assess the treatment effect of linezolid, daptomycin, and vancomycin on in-hospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to identify patient characteristics associated with the effectiveness of each antibiotic.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The deep learning-based model predicted that vancomycin, daptomycin, and linezolid reduced mortality by 15.86% (17.90% to 13.82%), 9.68% (11.83% to 7.53%), and 10.74% (12.64% to 8.84%), respectively, with vancomycin showing the greatest reduction. The average treatment effect for in-hospital mortality reduction with vancomycin was significantly greater than that with linezolid and daptomycin (both <em>P</em> < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression for treatment effects revealed that vancomycin was particularly effective in patients of advanced age, those with chronic liver disease, and those with end-stage kidney disease, while it was less effective in patients with congestive heart failure or cancer. Daptomycin exhibited superior efficacy over vancomycin in patients with cancer, and linezolid was more effective in patients with cancer, hypertension, and congestive heart failure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights linezolid and daptomycin treatment in select subgroups, while a deep learning–based model enables personalised antibiotic recommendations for ICU treatment strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15936,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance","volume":"45 ","pages":"Pages 70-76"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimising personalised antibiotic treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections in ICU patients using a deep learning–based causal inference approach\",\"authors\":\"Min Woo Kang, Shin Young Ahn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jgar.2025.08.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Methicillin‑resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs) in intensive care units (ICUs) carry high mortality, and although vancomycin remains standard treatment, daptomycin and linezolid may benefit specific subgroups. This study evaluates the mortality reduction associated with vancomycin, daptomycin, and linezolid using a deep learning–based causal inference model.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III and MIMIC-IV databases, including 270 ICU patients with MRSA BSI. A deep learning-based causal inference model was used to assess the treatment effect of linezolid, daptomycin, and vancomycin on in-hospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to identify patient characteristics associated with the effectiveness of each antibiotic.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The deep learning-based model predicted that vancomycin, daptomycin, and linezolid reduced mortality by 15.86% (17.90% to 13.82%), 9.68% (11.83% to 7.53%), and 10.74% (12.64% to 8.84%), respectively, with vancomycin showing the greatest reduction. The average treatment effect for in-hospital mortality reduction with vancomycin was significantly greater than that with linezolid and daptomycin (both <em>P</em> < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression for treatment effects revealed that vancomycin was particularly effective in patients of advanced age, those with chronic liver disease, and those with end-stage kidney disease, while it was less effective in patients with congestive heart failure or cancer. Daptomycin exhibited superior efficacy over vancomycin in patients with cancer, and linezolid was more effective in patients with cancer, hypertension, and congestive heart failure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights linezolid and daptomycin treatment in select subgroups, while a deep learning–based model enables personalised antibiotic recommendations for ICU treatment strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 70-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213716525001936\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213716525001936","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimising personalised antibiotic treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections in ICU patients using a deep learning–based causal inference approach
Objective
Methicillin‑resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs) in intensive care units (ICUs) carry high mortality, and although vancomycin remains standard treatment, daptomycin and linezolid may benefit specific subgroups. This study evaluates the mortality reduction associated with vancomycin, daptomycin, and linezolid using a deep learning–based causal inference model.
Methods
Data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III and MIMIC-IV databases, including 270 ICU patients with MRSA BSI. A deep learning-based causal inference model was used to assess the treatment effect of linezolid, daptomycin, and vancomycin on in-hospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to identify patient characteristics associated with the effectiveness of each antibiotic.
Results
The deep learning-based model predicted that vancomycin, daptomycin, and linezolid reduced mortality by 15.86% (17.90% to 13.82%), 9.68% (11.83% to 7.53%), and 10.74% (12.64% to 8.84%), respectively, with vancomycin showing the greatest reduction. The average treatment effect for in-hospital mortality reduction with vancomycin was significantly greater than that with linezolid and daptomycin (both P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression for treatment effects revealed that vancomycin was particularly effective in patients of advanced age, those with chronic liver disease, and those with end-stage kidney disease, while it was less effective in patients with congestive heart failure or cancer. Daptomycin exhibited superior efficacy over vancomycin in patients with cancer, and linezolid was more effective in patients with cancer, hypertension, and congestive heart failure.
Conclusion
This study highlights linezolid and daptomycin treatment in select subgroups, while a deep learning–based model enables personalised antibiotic recommendations for ICU treatment strategies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance (JGAR) is a quarterly online journal run by an international Editorial Board that focuses on the global spread of antibiotic-resistant microbes.
JGAR is a dedicated journal for all professionals working in research, health care, the environment and animal infection control, aiming to track the resistance threat worldwide and provides a single voice devoted to antimicrobial resistance (AMR).
Featuring peer-reviewed and up to date research articles, reviews, short notes and hot topics JGAR covers the key topics related to antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal and antiparasitic resistance.