美国青光眼专家的开角型青光眼治疗偏好。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jocelyn Liu, Iris M Kim, Evan M Chen, Travis C Porco, Stephen D McLeod, Gus Gazzard, Kieran S O'Brien, Catherine Q Sun
{"title":"美国青光眼专家的开角型青光眼治疗偏好。","authors":"Jocelyn Liu, Iris M Kim, Evan M Chen, Travis C Porco, Stephen D McLeod, Gus Gazzard, Kieran S O'Brien, Catherine Q Sun","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>This cross-sectional survey study evaluated the current treatment preferences of US glaucoma specialists for open-angle glaucoma, finding that most preferred selective laser trabeculoplasty over topical medications for treatment-naïve patients with ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe US glaucoma specialists' preferences regarding the use of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) versus topical glaucoma medications for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Actively practicing glaucoma specialists from the American Glaucoma Society were invited to participate in a survey assessing treatment preferences and influencing factors. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to determine predictors of preference for SLT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 136 eligible respondents, 65-71% preferred SLT for treatment-naïve patients with ocular hypertension, mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, or pigmentary glaucoma. For mild-to-moderate POAG on one medication, 75% of respondents favored SLT. For advanced POAG on maximum medical therapy, 57% of respondents favored surgery and 38% preferred SLT. Respondents indicated that reducing medication non-adherence (93%), suitable glaucoma type or stage (88%), and experience performing SLT (83%) were key facilitators in recommending SLT to their patients. In contrast, patients' inability to position for the procedure (78%), unsuitable glaucoma type or stage (67%), and comorbidities or contraindications to SLT (55%) were primary reasons to not recommend SLT. Physicians in private practice, those who completed fellowship training more recently, and those who see more treatment-naïve glaucoma patients were significantly more likely to prefer SLT over medication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of US glaucoma specialists report a preference for SLT over medication for open-angle glaucoma treatment, demonstrating that acceptance of SLT has increased over the past several years, especially for treatment-naïve patients. Statistically significant predictors of SLT preference were practice setting, practice duration, and patient volume.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open-Angle Glaucoma Treatment Preferences of US Glaucoma Specialists.\",\"authors\":\"Jocelyn Liu, Iris M Kim, Evan M Chen, Travis C Porco, Stephen D McLeod, Gus Gazzard, Kieran S O'Brien, Catherine Q Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>This cross-sectional survey study evaluated the current treatment preferences of US glaucoma specialists for open-angle glaucoma, finding that most preferred selective laser trabeculoplasty over topical medications for treatment-naïve patients with ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe US glaucoma specialists' preferences regarding the use of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) versus topical glaucoma medications for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Actively practicing glaucoma specialists from the American Glaucoma Society were invited to participate in a survey assessing treatment preferences and influencing factors. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to determine predictors of preference for SLT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 136 eligible respondents, 65-71% preferred SLT for treatment-naïve patients with ocular hypertension, mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, or pigmentary glaucoma. For mild-to-moderate POAG on one medication, 75% of respondents favored SLT. For advanced POAG on maximum medical therapy, 57% of respondents favored surgery and 38% preferred SLT. Respondents indicated that reducing medication non-adherence (93%), suitable glaucoma type or stage (88%), and experience performing SLT (83%) were key facilitators in recommending SLT to their patients. In contrast, patients' inability to position for the procedure (78%), unsuitable glaucoma type or stage (67%), and comorbidities or contraindications to SLT (55%) were primary reasons to not recommend SLT. Physicians in private practice, those who completed fellowship training more recently, and those who see more treatment-naïve glaucoma patients were significantly more likely to prefer SLT over medication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of US glaucoma specialists report a preference for SLT over medication for open-angle glaucoma treatment, demonstrating that acceptance of SLT has increased over the past several years, especially for treatment-naïve patients. Statistically significant predictors of SLT preference were practice setting, practice duration, and patient volume.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Glaucoma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Glaucoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002623\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002623","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实践:这项横断面调查研究评估了美国青光眼专家目前对开角型青光眼的治疗偏好,发现对于treatment-naïve高眼压和开角型青光眼患者,大多数人更喜欢选择性激光小梁成形术,而不是局部药物治疗。目的:描述美国青光眼专家对使用选择性激光小梁成形术(SLT)与局部青光眼药物治疗开角型青光眼的偏好。方法:邀请来自美国青光眼协会的青光眼专家参与一项评估治疗偏好和影响因素的调查。采用多变量逻辑回归来确定SLT偏好的预测因子。结果:在136名符合条件的受访者中,65-71%的人更倾向于SLT治疗treatment-naïve高眼压、轻度至中度原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)、假脱落性青光眼或色素性青光眼患者。对于一种药物的轻度至中度POAG, 75%的受访者赞成SLT。对于晚期POAG, 57%的受访者倾向于手术治疗,38%的受访者倾向于SLT治疗。受访者表示,减少药物依从性(93%),合适的青光眼类型或阶段(88%),以及执行SLT的经验(83%)是向患者推荐SLT的关键因素。相比之下,患者无法在手术中定位(78%),不适合青光眼类型或阶段(67%),SLT的合并症或禁忌症(55%)是不推荐SLT的主要原因。私人诊所的医生,那些最近完成奖学金培训的医生,以及那些见过更多treatment-naïve青光眼患者的医生更倾向于SLT而不是药物治疗。结论:大多数美国青光眼专家报告说,在开角青光眼治疗中,SLT优于药物治疗,这表明在过去几年中,SLT的接受度有所增加,尤其是treatment-naïve患者。有统计学意义的SLT偏好预测因子是练习环境、练习持续时间和患者数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Open-Angle Glaucoma Treatment Preferences of US Glaucoma Specialists.

Prcis: This cross-sectional survey study evaluated the current treatment preferences of US glaucoma specialists for open-angle glaucoma, finding that most preferred selective laser trabeculoplasty over topical medications for treatment-naïve patients with ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma.

Purpose: To describe US glaucoma specialists' preferences regarding the use of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) versus topical glaucoma medications for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma.

Methods: Actively practicing glaucoma specialists from the American Glaucoma Society were invited to participate in a survey assessing treatment preferences and influencing factors. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to determine predictors of preference for SLT.

Results: Of 136 eligible respondents, 65-71% preferred SLT for treatment-naïve patients with ocular hypertension, mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, or pigmentary glaucoma. For mild-to-moderate POAG on one medication, 75% of respondents favored SLT. For advanced POAG on maximum medical therapy, 57% of respondents favored surgery and 38% preferred SLT. Respondents indicated that reducing medication non-adherence (93%), suitable glaucoma type or stage (88%), and experience performing SLT (83%) were key facilitators in recommending SLT to their patients. In contrast, patients' inability to position for the procedure (78%), unsuitable glaucoma type or stage (67%), and comorbidities or contraindications to SLT (55%) were primary reasons to not recommend SLT. Physicians in private practice, those who completed fellowship training more recently, and those who see more treatment-naïve glaucoma patients were significantly more likely to prefer SLT over medication.

Conclusion: The majority of US glaucoma specialists report a preference for SLT over medication for open-angle glaucoma treatment, demonstrating that acceptance of SLT has increased over the past several years, especially for treatment-naïve patients. Statistically significant predictors of SLT preference were practice setting, practice duration, and patient volume.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信