橡木木屑和废蘑菇基质饲养白斑花原蝇幼虫的微生物品质和细菌多样性。

IF 2.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
K.M. Park , S.Y. Kim , Y.S. Lee
{"title":"橡木木屑和废蘑菇基质饲养白斑花原蝇幼虫的微生物品质和细菌多样性。","authors":"K.M. Park ,&nbsp;S.Y. Kim ,&nbsp;Y.S. Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, we investigated the microbial quality and bacterial diversity in <em>P. brevitarsis</em> larvae reared on different substrates (spent mushrooms and oak sawdust). The microbiological quality of the rearing substrates differed significantly. Total viable counts (TVC) did not differ between oak sawdust and mushroom-based substrates, whereas coliforms (4.3 vs. 3.0 log CFU/g) and <em>Bacillus cereus</em> group (3.9 vs. 3.0 log CFU/g) were lower in the mushroom-based substrate. The drying process markedly improved microbial quality, reducing total viable counts from 9.4 to 9.1 to 7.3–4.0 log CFU/g and lowering <em>B. cereus</em> group, coliform, and fungi to near or below detection levels (&lt;1 log CFU/g). Major pathogens were not detected in dried larvae. Comparative analyses at the phylum, genus, and species levels revealed distinct microbial profiles between substrates and larval guts. Substrate microbiota were dominated by environmental taxa, whereas larval guts were enriched in host-associated genera such as <em>Citrobacter, Dysgonomonas</em>, <em>Bacteroides</em>, and <em>Lactococcus</em>, and species including <em>Proteiniphilum acetatigenes</em> and <em>Massilibacteroides vaginae</em>. These patterns indicate a host-driven selection of gut microbiota during larval development, consistent across both oak sawdust and mushroom-based substrates. Both mushroom-based and oak sawdust substrates proved microbiologically safe for rearing <em>P. brevitarsis</em> larvae, with slightly lower microbial loads observed in the mushroom-based group. In addition, mushroom-based substrates promoted beneficial gut bacteria and offered sustainable reuse of agricultural byproducts. These findings highlight the potential of substrate selection to improve edible insect safety and support circular economy practices, reinforcing the role of <em>P. brevitarsis</em> as a sustainable protein source.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 10","pages":"Article 100608"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbiological Quality and Bacterial Diversity of Protaetia brevitarsis (White-Spotted Flower Chafer) Larvae Reared on Oak Sawdust and Spent Mushroom Substrate\",\"authors\":\"K.M. Park ,&nbsp;S.Y. Kim ,&nbsp;Y.S. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this study, we investigated the microbial quality and bacterial diversity in <em>P. brevitarsis</em> larvae reared on different substrates (spent mushrooms and oak sawdust). The microbiological quality of the rearing substrates differed significantly. Total viable counts (TVC) did not differ between oak sawdust and mushroom-based substrates, whereas coliforms (4.3 vs. 3.0 log CFU/g) and <em>Bacillus cereus</em> group (3.9 vs. 3.0 log CFU/g) were lower in the mushroom-based substrate. The drying process markedly improved microbial quality, reducing total viable counts from 9.4 to 9.1 to 7.3–4.0 log CFU/g and lowering <em>B. cereus</em> group, coliform, and fungi to near or below detection levels (&lt;1 log CFU/g). Major pathogens were not detected in dried larvae. Comparative analyses at the phylum, genus, and species levels revealed distinct microbial profiles between substrates and larval guts. Substrate microbiota were dominated by environmental taxa, whereas larval guts were enriched in host-associated genera such as <em>Citrobacter, Dysgonomonas</em>, <em>Bacteroides</em>, and <em>Lactococcus</em>, and species including <em>Proteiniphilum acetatigenes</em> and <em>Massilibacteroides vaginae</em>. These patterns indicate a host-driven selection of gut microbiota during larval development, consistent across both oak sawdust and mushroom-based substrates. Both mushroom-based and oak sawdust substrates proved microbiologically safe for rearing <em>P. brevitarsis</em> larvae, with slightly lower microbial loads observed in the mushroom-based group. In addition, mushroom-based substrates promoted beneficial gut bacteria and offered sustainable reuse of agricultural byproducts. These findings highlight the potential of substrate selection to improve edible insect safety and support circular economy practices, reinforcing the role of <em>P. brevitarsis</em> as a sustainable protein source.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\"88 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 100608\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25001607\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25001607","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究研究了不同基质(废蘑菇和橡木木屑)饲养的短白原蝇(Protaetia brevitarsis)幼虫的微生物品质和细菌多样性。不同饲养基质的微生物品质差异显著。总活菌数(TVC)在橡木木屑和蘑菇基质之间没有差异,而大肠菌群(4.3 vs 3.0 log CFU/g)和蜡样芽孢杆菌组(3.9 vs 3.0 log CFU/g)在蘑菇基质中较低。干燥过程显著提高了微生物品质,将总活菌数从9.4-9.1降低到7.3-4.0 log CFU/g,并将蜡样芽孢杆菌群、大肠菌群和真菌降至接近或低于检测水平(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Microbiological Quality and Bacterial Diversity of Protaetia brevitarsis (White-Spotted Flower Chafer) Larvae Reared on Oak Sawdust and Spent Mushroom Substrate
In this study, we investigated the microbial quality and bacterial diversity in P. brevitarsis larvae reared on different substrates (spent mushrooms and oak sawdust). The microbiological quality of the rearing substrates differed significantly. Total viable counts (TVC) did not differ between oak sawdust and mushroom-based substrates, whereas coliforms (4.3 vs. 3.0 log CFU/g) and Bacillus cereus group (3.9 vs. 3.0 log CFU/g) were lower in the mushroom-based substrate. The drying process markedly improved microbial quality, reducing total viable counts from 9.4 to 9.1 to 7.3–4.0 log CFU/g and lowering B. cereus group, coliform, and fungi to near or below detection levels (<1 log CFU/g). Major pathogens were not detected in dried larvae. Comparative analyses at the phylum, genus, and species levels revealed distinct microbial profiles between substrates and larval guts. Substrate microbiota were dominated by environmental taxa, whereas larval guts were enriched in host-associated genera such as Citrobacter, Dysgonomonas, Bacteroides, and Lactococcus, and species including Proteiniphilum acetatigenes and Massilibacteroides vaginae. These patterns indicate a host-driven selection of gut microbiota during larval development, consistent across both oak sawdust and mushroom-based substrates. Both mushroom-based and oak sawdust substrates proved microbiologically safe for rearing P. brevitarsis larvae, with slightly lower microbial loads observed in the mushroom-based group. In addition, mushroom-based substrates promoted beneficial gut bacteria and offered sustainable reuse of agricultural byproducts. These findings highlight the potential of substrate selection to improve edible insect safety and support circular economy practices, reinforcing the role of P. brevitarsis as a sustainable protein source.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信