胶原膜固定针对即刻种植体颊骨再生的影响:犬临床前研究。

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Yuma Hazama, Takahisa Iida, Niklaus P Lang, Fernando M Muñoz Guzon, Giovanna Iezzi, Daniele Botticelli, Shunsuke Baba
{"title":"胶原膜固定针对即刻种植体颊骨再生的影响:犬临床前研究。","authors":"Yuma Hazama, Takahisa Iida, Niklaus P Lang, Fernando M Muñoz Guzon, Giovanna Iezzi, Daniele Botticelli, Shunsuke Baba","doi":"10.3390/jfb16080281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of collagen membrane fixation during guided bone regeneration (GBR) remains debatable, particularly in post-extraction sockets with buccal defects and concomitant immediate implant placement. This study evaluated whether or not fixation with titanium pins improved regenerative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six adult Beagle dogs received bilateral extractions of the fourth mandibular premolars. An implant was immediately placed in both the distal alveoli, and standardized buccal bone defects (5 mm height, 3-2 mm width) were prepared. All defects were filled with a slowly resorbing equine xenograft and covered by a resorbable pericardium membrane. At the test sites, the membrane was apically fixed with pins, while no fixation was applied to the control sites. After 3 months of healing, histomorphometric analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The vertical bone gain of the buccal crest was 3.2 mm in the test sites (pin group) and 2.9 mm in the control sites (no-pin) (<i>p</i> > 0.754). No significant difference was found in terms of bone-to-implant contact (BIC). However, residual graft particles were located significantly more coronally in the pin group compared to the no-pin group (<i>p</i> = 0.021). Morphometric analyses revealed similar new bone formation within the groups, but with higher amounts of residual xenograft and soft tissue in the pin group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Membrane fixation did not significantly enhance vertical bone gain, and although the slightly higher regeneration in the pin group (3.2 mm vs. 2.9 mm) may hold clinical relevance in esthetically sensitive areas and osseointegration, it appeared to limit apical migration of the grafting material.</p>","PeriodicalId":15767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","volume":"16 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12387244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Collagen Membrane Fixation with Pins on Buccal Bone Regeneration in Immediate Dental Implant Sites: A Preclinical Study in Dogs.\",\"authors\":\"Yuma Hazama, Takahisa Iida, Niklaus P Lang, Fernando M Muñoz Guzon, Giovanna Iezzi, Daniele Botticelli, Shunsuke Baba\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jfb16080281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of collagen membrane fixation during guided bone regeneration (GBR) remains debatable, particularly in post-extraction sockets with buccal defects and concomitant immediate implant placement. This study evaluated whether or not fixation with titanium pins improved regenerative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six adult Beagle dogs received bilateral extractions of the fourth mandibular premolars. An implant was immediately placed in both the distal alveoli, and standardized buccal bone defects (5 mm height, 3-2 mm width) were prepared. All defects were filled with a slowly resorbing equine xenograft and covered by a resorbable pericardium membrane. At the test sites, the membrane was apically fixed with pins, while no fixation was applied to the control sites. After 3 months of healing, histomorphometric analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The vertical bone gain of the buccal crest was 3.2 mm in the test sites (pin group) and 2.9 mm in the control sites (no-pin) (<i>p</i> > 0.754). No significant difference was found in terms of bone-to-implant contact (BIC). However, residual graft particles were located significantly more coronally in the pin group compared to the no-pin group (<i>p</i> = 0.021). Morphometric analyses revealed similar new bone formation within the groups, but with higher amounts of residual xenograft and soft tissue in the pin group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Membrane fixation did not significantly enhance vertical bone gain, and although the slightly higher regeneration in the pin group (3.2 mm vs. 2.9 mm) may hold clinical relevance in esthetically sensitive areas and osseointegration, it appeared to limit apical migration of the grafting material.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Functional Biomaterials\",\"volume\":\"16 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12387244/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Functional Biomaterials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16080281\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16080281","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胶原膜固定在引导骨再生(GBR)中的作用仍然存在争议,特别是在拔牙后带颊缺损的牙槽和伴随的即刻种植体植入中。本研究评估钛针固定是否能改善再生结果。方法:对6只成年Beagle犬进行双侧第四下颌前磨牙拔除。立即在远端牙槽内放置种植体,并制备标准化的颊骨缺损(5 mm高,3-2 mm宽)。所有的缺损都用缓慢吸收的马异种移植物填充,并用可吸收的心包膜覆盖。在试验点,膜顶端用针固定,而在对照点不固定。愈合3个月后,进行组织形态学分析。结果:试验部位(针组)颊嵴垂直骨长高为3.2 mm,对照组(无针组)为2.9 mm (p > 0.754)。在骨与种植体接触(BIC)方面没有发现显著差异。然而,与无针组相比,针组的残留移植物颗粒明显位于冠状位置(p = 0.021)。形态计量学分析显示,各组内新骨形成相似,但针组有更多的残余异种移植物和软组织。结论:膜固定并没有显著提高垂直骨长高,尽管针组稍高的再生(3.2 mm vs 2.9 mm)可能在美学敏感区域和骨整合方面具有临床意义,但它似乎限制了移植材料的根尖迁移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Effect of Collagen Membrane Fixation with Pins on Buccal Bone Regeneration in Immediate Dental Implant Sites: A Preclinical Study in Dogs.

The Effect of Collagen Membrane Fixation with Pins on Buccal Bone Regeneration in Immediate Dental Implant Sites: A Preclinical Study in Dogs.

The Effect of Collagen Membrane Fixation with Pins on Buccal Bone Regeneration in Immediate Dental Implant Sites: A Preclinical Study in Dogs.

The Effect of Collagen Membrane Fixation with Pins on Buccal Bone Regeneration in Immediate Dental Implant Sites: A Preclinical Study in Dogs.

Background: The role of collagen membrane fixation during guided bone regeneration (GBR) remains debatable, particularly in post-extraction sockets with buccal defects and concomitant immediate implant placement. This study evaluated whether or not fixation with titanium pins improved regenerative outcomes.

Methods: Six adult Beagle dogs received bilateral extractions of the fourth mandibular premolars. An implant was immediately placed in both the distal alveoli, and standardized buccal bone defects (5 mm height, 3-2 mm width) were prepared. All defects were filled with a slowly resorbing equine xenograft and covered by a resorbable pericardium membrane. At the test sites, the membrane was apically fixed with pins, while no fixation was applied to the control sites. After 3 months of healing, histomorphometric analyses were performed.

Results: The vertical bone gain of the buccal crest was 3.2 mm in the test sites (pin group) and 2.9 mm in the control sites (no-pin) (p > 0.754). No significant difference was found in terms of bone-to-implant contact (BIC). However, residual graft particles were located significantly more coronally in the pin group compared to the no-pin group (p = 0.021). Morphometric analyses revealed similar new bone formation within the groups, but with higher amounts of residual xenograft and soft tissue in the pin group.

Conclusions: Membrane fixation did not significantly enhance vertical bone gain, and although the slightly higher regeneration in the pin group (3.2 mm vs. 2.9 mm) may hold clinical relevance in esthetically sensitive areas and osseointegration, it appeared to limit apical migration of the grafting material.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Journal of Functional Biomaterials Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
226
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Functional Biomaterials (JFB, ISSN 2079-4983) is an international and interdisciplinary scientific journal that publishes regular research papers (articles), reviews and short communications about applications of materials for biomedical use. JFB covers subjects from chemistry, pharmacy, biology, physics over to engineering. The journal focuses on the preparation, performance and use of functional biomaterials in biomedical devices and their behaviour in physiological environments. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Several topical special issues will be published. Scope: adhesion, adsorption, biocompatibility, biohybrid materials, bio-inert materials, biomaterials, biomedical devices, biomimetic materials, bone repair, cardiovascular devices, ceramics, composite materials, dental implants, dental materials, drug delivery systems, functional biopolymers, glasses, hyper branched polymers, molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), nanomedicine, nanoparticles, nanotechnology, natural materials, self-assembly smart materials, stimuli responsive materials, surface modification, tissue devices, tissue engineering, tissue-derived materials, urological devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信