自动CT图像分析在水合作用下预防尿路结石试验中的验证。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-26 DOI:10.1089/end.2024.0582
Gregory E Tasian, Naim M Maalouf, Jonathan D Harper, Sri Sivalingam, Joey Logan, Hussein R Al-Khalidi, John C Lieske, Antoine Selman-Fermin, Alana C Desai, Henry Lai, Ziya Kirkali, Charles D Scales, Yong Fan
{"title":"自动CT图像分析在水合作用下预防尿路结石试验中的验证。","authors":"Gregory E Tasian, Naim M Maalouf, Jonathan D Harper, Sri Sivalingam, Joey Logan, Hussein R Al-Khalidi, John C Lieske, Antoine Selman-Fermin, Alana C Desai, Henry Lai, Ziya Kirkali, Charles D Scales, Yong Fan","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction and Objective:</i></b> Kidney stone growth and new stone formation are common clinical trial endpoints and are associated with future symptomatic events. To date, a manual review of CT scans has been required to assess stone growth and new stone formation, which is laborious. We validated the performance of a software algorithm that automatically identified, registered, and measured stones over longitudinal CT studies. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We validated the performance of a pretrained machine learning algorithm to classify stone outcomes on longitudinal CT scan images at baseline and at the end of the 2-year follow-up period for 62 participants aged >18 years in the Prevention of Urinary Stones with Hydration (PUSH) randomized controlled trial. Stones were defined as an area of voxels with a minimum linear dimension of 2 mm that was higher in density than the mean plus 4 standard deviations of all nonnegative HU values within the kidney. The four outcomes assessed were: (1) growth of at least one existing stone by ≥2 mm, (2) formation of at least one new ≥2 mm stone, (3) no stone growth or new stone formation, and (4) loss of at least one stone. The accuracy of the algorithm was determined by comparing its outcomes to the gold standard of independent review of the CT images by at least two expert clinicians. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The algorithm correctly classified outcomes for 61 paired scans (98.4%). One pair that the algorithm incorrectly classified as stone growth was a new renal artery calcification on end-of-study CT. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> An automated image analysis method validated for the prospective PUSH trial was highly accurate for determining clinical outcomes of new stone formation, stone growth, stable stone size, and stone loss on longitudinal CT images. This method has the potential to improve the accuracy and efficiency of clinical care and endpoint determination for future clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"953-959"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of an Automated CT Image Analysis in the Prevention of Urinary Stones with Hydration Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Gregory E Tasian, Naim M Maalouf, Jonathan D Harper, Sri Sivalingam, Joey Logan, Hussein R Al-Khalidi, John C Lieske, Antoine Selman-Fermin, Alana C Desai, Henry Lai, Ziya Kirkali, Charles D Scales, Yong Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/end.2024.0582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction and Objective:</i></b> Kidney stone growth and new stone formation are common clinical trial endpoints and are associated with future symptomatic events. To date, a manual review of CT scans has been required to assess stone growth and new stone formation, which is laborious. We validated the performance of a software algorithm that automatically identified, registered, and measured stones over longitudinal CT studies. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We validated the performance of a pretrained machine learning algorithm to classify stone outcomes on longitudinal CT scan images at baseline and at the end of the 2-year follow-up period for 62 participants aged >18 years in the Prevention of Urinary Stones with Hydration (PUSH) randomized controlled trial. Stones were defined as an area of voxels with a minimum linear dimension of 2 mm that was higher in density than the mean plus 4 standard deviations of all nonnegative HU values within the kidney. The four outcomes assessed were: (1) growth of at least one existing stone by ≥2 mm, (2) formation of at least one new ≥2 mm stone, (3) no stone growth or new stone formation, and (4) loss of at least one stone. The accuracy of the algorithm was determined by comparing its outcomes to the gold standard of independent review of the CT images by at least two expert clinicians. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The algorithm correctly classified outcomes for 61 paired scans (98.4%). One pair that the algorithm incorrectly classified as stone growth was a new renal artery calcification on end-of-study CT. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> An automated image analysis method validated for the prospective PUSH trial was highly accurate for determining clinical outcomes of new stone formation, stone growth, stable stone size, and stone loss on longitudinal CT images. This method has the potential to improve the accuracy and efficiency of clinical care and endpoint determination for future clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"953-959\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0582\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0582","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍和目的:肾结石生长和新结石形成是常见的临床试验终点,并与未来的症状事件相关。迄今为止,需要人工检查CT扫描来评估结石的生长和新结石的形成,这是很费力的。我们验证了一种软件算法的性能,该算法可以在纵向CT研究中自动识别、记录和测量结石。方法:在预防水合性尿路结石(PUSH)随机对照试验中,我们验证了一种预训练的机器学习算法的性能,该算法用于在基线和2年随访期结束时对62名年龄在10至18岁之间的参与者的纵向CT扫描图像进行结石结果分类。结石被定义为最小线性尺寸为2mm的体素面积,其密度高于肾脏内所有非阴性HU值的平均值加上4个标准差。评估的四个结果是:(1)至少一颗现有结石生长≥2mm,(2)至少一颗新的≥2mm结石形成,(3)没有结石生长或新的结石形成,(4)至少一颗结石丢失。该算法的准确性是通过将其结果与至少两位专家临床医生对CT图像进行独立审查的金标准进行比较来确定的。结果:该算法对61个配对扫描结果进行了正确分类(98.4%)。其中一对被算法错误地归类为结石生长的是研究结束时CT上新的肾动脉钙化。结论:在前瞻性PUSH试验中验证的自动图像分析方法在确定纵向CT图像上新结石形成、结石生长、稳定结石大小和结石丢失的临床结果方面具有很高的准确性。该方法有可能提高临床护理的准确性和效率,并为未来的临床试验确定终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of an Automated CT Image Analysis in the Prevention of Urinary Stones with Hydration Trial.

Introduction and Objective: Kidney stone growth and new stone formation are common clinical trial endpoints and are associated with future symptomatic events. To date, a manual review of CT scans has been required to assess stone growth and new stone formation, which is laborious. We validated the performance of a software algorithm that automatically identified, registered, and measured stones over longitudinal CT studies. Methods: We validated the performance of a pretrained machine learning algorithm to classify stone outcomes on longitudinal CT scan images at baseline and at the end of the 2-year follow-up period for 62 participants aged >18 years in the Prevention of Urinary Stones with Hydration (PUSH) randomized controlled trial. Stones were defined as an area of voxels with a minimum linear dimension of 2 mm that was higher in density than the mean plus 4 standard deviations of all nonnegative HU values within the kidney. The four outcomes assessed were: (1) growth of at least one existing stone by ≥2 mm, (2) formation of at least one new ≥2 mm stone, (3) no stone growth or new stone formation, and (4) loss of at least one stone. The accuracy of the algorithm was determined by comparing its outcomes to the gold standard of independent review of the CT images by at least two expert clinicians. Results: The algorithm correctly classified outcomes for 61 paired scans (98.4%). One pair that the algorithm incorrectly classified as stone growth was a new renal artery calcification on end-of-study CT. Conclusions: An automated image analysis method validated for the prospective PUSH trial was highly accurate for determining clinical outcomes of new stone formation, stone growth, stable stone size, and stone loss on longitudinal CT images. This method has the potential to improve the accuracy and efficiency of clinical care and endpoint determination for future clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信