{"title":"切萨皮克湾流域居民对城市化景观中农业系统不同情景的支持。","authors":"Edem Avemegah, Jessica D Ulrich-Schad","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To help envision the desired futures for agricultural systems in urbanized landscapes over the next 25 years, we assess the support of agricultural and nonagricultural residents for scenarios that propose alternative approaches to achieve long-term economic and environmental sustainability for agriculture in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed (CBW). The scenarios include (1) business as usual-or maintaining current trends, (2) providing incentives (e.g., public funds) that help agricultural producers engage in best management practices, (3) preserving farmland, (4) increasing farm profitability through enhanced local food efforts and strengthening rural and urban relationships, and (5) encouraging a societal shift from consumption of meat to vegetable-based proteins. We draw upon data from an online panel of 955 residents and a mail/online survey of 365 producers across the southern part of the CBW (Maryland, Delaware, and Virginia) in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Our results indicate that nonagricultural residents mostly supported Scenarios 3 and 4, while agricultural residents mostly supported Scenarios 2 and 3. The least supported scenarios from both groups were Scenarios 1 and 5. Residents' level of education, income, other sources of income, political identity, family farm ownership, age, and gender are related to support of the top scenarios. This information can help stakeholders and policymakers understand the broader landscape of perceptions and help with state or regional planning efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chesapeake Bay Watershed residents' support for varied scenarios for agricultural systems in urbanized landscapes.\",\"authors\":\"Edem Avemegah, Jessica D Ulrich-Schad\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeq2.70072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To help envision the desired futures for agricultural systems in urbanized landscapes over the next 25 years, we assess the support of agricultural and nonagricultural residents for scenarios that propose alternative approaches to achieve long-term economic and environmental sustainability for agriculture in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed (CBW). The scenarios include (1) business as usual-or maintaining current trends, (2) providing incentives (e.g., public funds) that help agricultural producers engage in best management practices, (3) preserving farmland, (4) increasing farm profitability through enhanced local food efforts and strengthening rural and urban relationships, and (5) encouraging a societal shift from consumption of meat to vegetable-based proteins. We draw upon data from an online panel of 955 residents and a mail/online survey of 365 producers across the southern part of the CBW (Maryland, Delaware, and Virginia) in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Our results indicate that nonagricultural residents mostly supported Scenarios 3 and 4, while agricultural residents mostly supported Scenarios 2 and 3. The least supported scenarios from both groups were Scenarios 1 and 5. Residents' level of education, income, other sources of income, political identity, family farm ownership, age, and gender are related to support of the top scenarios. This information can help stakeholders and policymakers understand the broader landscape of perceptions and help with state or regional planning efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of environmental quality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of environmental quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70072\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Chesapeake Bay Watershed residents' support for varied scenarios for agricultural systems in urbanized landscapes.
To help envision the desired futures for agricultural systems in urbanized landscapes over the next 25 years, we assess the support of agricultural and nonagricultural residents for scenarios that propose alternative approaches to achieve long-term economic and environmental sustainability for agriculture in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed (CBW). The scenarios include (1) business as usual-or maintaining current trends, (2) providing incentives (e.g., public funds) that help agricultural producers engage in best management practices, (3) preserving farmland, (4) increasing farm profitability through enhanced local food efforts and strengthening rural and urban relationships, and (5) encouraging a societal shift from consumption of meat to vegetable-based proteins. We draw upon data from an online panel of 955 residents and a mail/online survey of 365 producers across the southern part of the CBW (Maryland, Delaware, and Virginia) in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Our results indicate that nonagricultural residents mostly supported Scenarios 3 and 4, while agricultural residents mostly supported Scenarios 2 and 3. The least supported scenarios from both groups were Scenarios 1 and 5. Residents' level of education, income, other sources of income, political identity, family farm ownership, age, and gender are related to support of the top scenarios. This information can help stakeholders and policymakers understand the broader landscape of perceptions and help with state or regional planning efforts.
期刊介绍:
Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring.
Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.