体外冲击波碎石术治疗≤1.0 cm2的儿童输尿管结石

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Sinharib Çitgez, Elif Altınay Kırlı, Muhammet Demirbilek, Feyyaz Irmak, Engin Dereköylü, Bülent Önal
{"title":"体外冲击波碎石术治疗≤1.0 cm2的儿童输尿管结石","authors":"Sinharib Çitgez, Elif Altınay Kırlı, Muhammet Demirbilek, Feyyaz Irmak, Engin Dereköylü, Bülent Önal","doi":"10.1177/08927790251372163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> This retrospective study compares extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) in pediatric ureteral stones ≤1.0 cm<sup>2</sup>, aiming to determine the optimal treatment based on clinical outcomes. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> The study included patients with ureteral stones ≤1.0 cm<sup>2</sup> eligible for SWL or URS. Treatment choices were made based on family decisions. SWL was performed under sedation, with 180° rotation for distal stones, whereas URS was conducted under general anesthesia using semirigid/flexible ureteroscopes with Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy. Complications were classified using Satava and Clavien criteria, respectively. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 230 children (median age:7 y/o, interquartile range 4-12) underwent SWL (<i>n</i> = 129, 56%) or URS (<i>n</i> = 101, 44%)for ureteral stones ≤1.0 cm<sup>2</sup>. The groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics. SWL and URS had comparable stone-free rates (85% <i>vs</i> 80, <i>p</i> = 0.276), and there was no difference according to the location. However, URS had a higher overall complication rate (16% <i>vs</i> 4%, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Complication rates were significantly higher for distal stones treated with URS (<i>p</i> = 0.009), whereas stone-free rates were similar between proximal (<i>p</i> = 0.821) and distal stones (<i>p</i> = 0.332). Logistic regression analysis revealed that female gender and stone burden were significant factors in achieving overall stone-free status. When stone-free outcomes were evaluated based on stone location, female gender and a history of previous minimally invasive stone intervention were also found to be influential predictors. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> These findings indicate that SWL and URS provide comparable efficacy in stone clearance, but URS is associated with a higher complication rate, particularly for distal ureteral stones. Additionally, our data suggest that SWL remains a preferable first-line option, particularly for stones ≤1.0 cm<sup>2</sup>, whereas URS might be reserved for cases with larger stone burdens or prior treatment failures.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Still Alive for Pediatric Ureteral Stones ≤1.0 cm<sup>2</sup>.\",\"authors\":\"Sinharib Çitgez, Elif Altınay Kırlı, Muhammet Demirbilek, Feyyaz Irmak, Engin Dereköylü, Bülent Önal\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08927790251372163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> This retrospective study compares extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) in pediatric ureteral stones ≤1.0 cm<sup>2</sup>, aiming to determine the optimal treatment based on clinical outcomes. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> The study included patients with ureteral stones ≤1.0 cm<sup>2</sup> eligible for SWL or URS. Treatment choices were made based on family decisions. SWL was performed under sedation, with 180° rotation for distal stones, whereas URS was conducted under general anesthesia using semirigid/flexible ureteroscopes with Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy. Complications were classified using Satava and Clavien criteria, respectively. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 230 children (median age:7 y/o, interquartile range 4-12) underwent SWL (<i>n</i> = 129, 56%) or URS (<i>n</i> = 101, 44%)for ureteral stones ≤1.0 cm<sup>2</sup>. The groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics. SWL and URS had comparable stone-free rates (85% <i>vs</i> 80, <i>p</i> = 0.276), and there was no difference according to the location. However, URS had a higher overall complication rate (16% <i>vs</i> 4%, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Complication rates were significantly higher for distal stones treated with URS (<i>p</i> = 0.009), whereas stone-free rates were similar between proximal (<i>p</i> = 0.821) and distal stones (<i>p</i> = 0.332). Logistic regression analysis revealed that female gender and stone burden were significant factors in achieving overall stone-free status. When stone-free outcomes were evaluated based on stone location, female gender and a history of previous minimally invasive stone intervention were also found to be influential predictors. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> These findings indicate that SWL and URS provide comparable efficacy in stone clearance, but URS is associated with a higher complication rate, particularly for distal ureteral stones. Additionally, our data suggest that SWL remains a preferable first-line option, particularly for stones ≤1.0 cm<sup>2</sup>, whereas URS might be reserved for cases with larger stone burdens or prior treatment failures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08927790251372163\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08927790251372163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本回顾性研究比较了体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)和输尿管镜术(URS)治疗≤1.0 cm2的儿童输尿管结石,旨在根据临床结果确定最佳治疗方法。患者和方法:本研究纳入输尿管结石≤1.0 cm2符合SWL或URS条件的患者。治疗选择是基于家庭的决定。SWL在镇静下进行,远端结石旋转180°,URS在全麻下使用半刚性/柔性输尿管镜联合Ho:YAG激光碎石。并发症分类分别采用Satava和Clavien标准。结果:共有230名儿童(中位年龄:7岁,四分位数范围4-12)因输尿管结石≤1.0 cm2而行SWL (n = 129, 56%)或URS (n = 101, 44%)。这两组在人口统计学特征方面具有可比性。SWL和URS的无结石率相当(85% vs 80, p = 0.276),并且根据位置没有差异。然而,URS的总并发症发生率较高(16% vs 4%, p = 0.005)。URS治疗远端结石的并发症发生率显著高于远端结石(p = 0.009),而近端结石(p = 0.821)和远端结石(p = 0.332)的结石清除率相似。Logistic回归分析显示,女性性别和结石负担是实现整体无结石状态的重要因素。当根据结石位置评估无结石结果时,女性性别和既往微创结石干预史也被发现是有影响的预测因素。结论:这些研究结果表明,SWL和URS在结石清除方面具有相当的疗效,但URS的并发症发生率较高,特别是输尿管远端结石。此外,我们的数据表明,SWL仍然是首选的一线选择,特别是对于≤1.0 cm2的结石,而URS可能保留给结石负担较大或先前治疗失败的病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Still Alive for Pediatric Ureteral Stones ≤1.0 cm2.

Introduction: This retrospective study compares extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) in pediatric ureteral stones ≤1.0 cm2, aiming to determine the optimal treatment based on clinical outcomes. Patients and Methods: The study included patients with ureteral stones ≤1.0 cm2 eligible for SWL or URS. Treatment choices were made based on family decisions. SWL was performed under sedation, with 180° rotation for distal stones, whereas URS was conducted under general anesthesia using semirigid/flexible ureteroscopes with Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy. Complications were classified using Satava and Clavien criteria, respectively. Results: A total of 230 children (median age:7 y/o, interquartile range 4-12) underwent SWL (n = 129, 56%) or URS (n = 101, 44%)for ureteral stones ≤1.0 cm2. The groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics. SWL and URS had comparable stone-free rates (85% vs 80, p = 0.276), and there was no difference according to the location. However, URS had a higher overall complication rate (16% vs 4%, p = 0.005). Complication rates were significantly higher for distal stones treated with URS (p = 0.009), whereas stone-free rates were similar between proximal (p = 0.821) and distal stones (p = 0.332). Logistic regression analysis revealed that female gender and stone burden were significant factors in achieving overall stone-free status. When stone-free outcomes were evaluated based on stone location, female gender and a history of previous minimally invasive stone intervention were also found to be influential predictors. Conclusion: These findings indicate that SWL and URS provide comparable efficacy in stone clearance, but URS is associated with a higher complication rate, particularly for distal ureteral stones. Additionally, our data suggest that SWL remains a preferable first-line option, particularly for stones ≤1.0 cm2, whereas URS might be reserved for cases with larger stone burdens or prior treatment failures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信