Jessica Joanna Zachar, Peter Reher, Sobia Zafar, Laurence James Walsh
{"title":"评价牙科光生物调节镇痛作用的挑战:述评。","authors":"Jessica Joanna Zachar, Peter Reher, Sobia Zafar, Laurence James Walsh","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The purpose of this narrative review is to explore the challenges and limitations in the methodologies for evaluating the analgesic effects of photobiomodulation in dentistry.</div></div><div><h3>Study selection, data & sources</h3><div>The literature published up to April 2025 in the English language was sourced from online databases and reference lists; search engines included Medline, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar; the relevance of papers was discussed by two reviewers; and a total of 42 publications were included in this narrative review. If there was disagreement between the two reviewers, a third one moderated the selection process.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Photobiomodulation has emerged as an alternative to traditional pharmacological analgesia in dentistry. Both lasers and light-emitting diodes can be used to modulate cellular responses, showing promising results for pain reduction in the oral cavity, particularly in the dental pulp and mucosal soft tissues. However, evaluating analgesic effects remains challenging due to variations in light sources, parameters, delivery modes, and target sites. Additionally, inconsistencies in study methodologies such as pain assessments, placebo effects, pain conditioning, and the presence of non-responders further complicate interpretation. Other variables, such as differences between hard and soft tissues, also contribute to variability.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Significance</h3><div>Photobiomodulation (PBM) shows promising potential as a non-invasive analgesic approach in dentistry. However, its integration into clinical practice remains uncertain due to variability in study methodologies, inconsistent reporting of treatment parameters, and a lack of standardized outcome measures. Consequently, the clinical significance of PBM results can vary widely, ranging from meaningful analgesic effects in some studies to minimal or non-significant effects in others. The absence of standardized PBM guidelines in dentistry continues to be a major barrier to its consistent implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 106077"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges in evaluating the analgesic effects of photobiomodulation in dentistry: A narrative review\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Joanna Zachar, Peter Reher, Sobia Zafar, Laurence James Walsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The purpose of this narrative review is to explore the challenges and limitations in the methodologies for evaluating the analgesic effects of photobiomodulation in dentistry.</div></div><div><h3>Study selection, data & sources</h3><div>The literature published up to April 2025 in the English language was sourced from online databases and reference lists; search engines included Medline, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar; the relevance of papers was discussed by two reviewers; and a total of 42 publications were included in this narrative review. If there was disagreement between the two reviewers, a third one moderated the selection process.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Photobiomodulation has emerged as an alternative to traditional pharmacological analgesia in dentistry. Both lasers and light-emitting diodes can be used to modulate cellular responses, showing promising results for pain reduction in the oral cavity, particularly in the dental pulp and mucosal soft tissues. However, evaluating analgesic effects remains challenging due to variations in light sources, parameters, delivery modes, and target sites. Additionally, inconsistencies in study methodologies such as pain assessments, placebo effects, pain conditioning, and the presence of non-responders further complicate interpretation. Other variables, such as differences between hard and soft tissues, also contribute to variability.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Significance</h3><div>Photobiomodulation (PBM) shows promising potential as a non-invasive analgesic approach in dentistry. However, its integration into clinical practice remains uncertain due to variability in study methodologies, inconsistent reporting of treatment parameters, and a lack of standardized outcome measures. Consequently, the clinical significance of PBM results can vary widely, ranging from meaningful analgesic effects in some studies to minimal or non-significant effects in others. The absence of standardized PBM guidelines in dentistry continues to be a major barrier to its consistent implementation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106077\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571225005238\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571225005238","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Challenges in evaluating the analgesic effects of photobiomodulation in dentistry: A narrative review
Objectives
The purpose of this narrative review is to explore the challenges and limitations in the methodologies for evaluating the analgesic effects of photobiomodulation in dentistry.
Study selection, data & sources
The literature published up to April 2025 in the English language was sourced from online databases and reference lists; search engines included Medline, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar; the relevance of papers was discussed by two reviewers; and a total of 42 publications were included in this narrative review. If there was disagreement between the two reviewers, a third one moderated the selection process.
Conclusions
Photobiomodulation has emerged as an alternative to traditional pharmacological analgesia in dentistry. Both lasers and light-emitting diodes can be used to modulate cellular responses, showing promising results for pain reduction in the oral cavity, particularly in the dental pulp and mucosal soft tissues. However, evaluating analgesic effects remains challenging due to variations in light sources, parameters, delivery modes, and target sites. Additionally, inconsistencies in study methodologies such as pain assessments, placebo effects, pain conditioning, and the presence of non-responders further complicate interpretation. Other variables, such as differences between hard and soft tissues, also contribute to variability.
Clinical Significance
Photobiomodulation (PBM) shows promising potential as a non-invasive analgesic approach in dentistry. However, its integration into clinical practice remains uncertain due to variability in study methodologies, inconsistent reporting of treatment parameters, and a lack of standardized outcome measures. Consequently, the clinical significance of PBM results can vary widely, ranging from meaningful analgesic effects in some studies to minimal or non-significant effects in others. The absence of standardized PBM guidelines in dentistry continues to be a major barrier to its consistent implementation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis.
Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research.
The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.